LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

IN THE MATTER OF BONNIE GREEN v THOMAS P. DINAPOLI, et al Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, Plaintiff: IN THE MATTER OF BONNIE GREEN, State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>I01_0103, Certificate, Elections, Dinapoli, Filing, Endorsement, Respondent, Appellants, Petition, Fatal Defect, Memorandum, Supreme Court, Acceptance, Election Law, Judge, County, Nassau, Publication, Appellate Division, Costs, Invalidate, Designating Petition, Failure, Pertinent, Time-stamp, Separate Book Entry, Book Entry Indicating, Green Contends, Indispensable Component, Dinapoli Argues, Board Employee , ContentID: 120248677

Case Documents
1 2001-08-30 OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 120587
2 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
ELECTIONS
DINAPOLI
FILING
ENDORSEMENT
RESPONDENT
APPELLANTS
PETITION
FATAL DEFECT
MEMORANDUM
SUPREME COURT
ACCEPTANCE
ELECTION LAW
JUDGE
COUNTY
NASSAU
PUBLICATION
APPELLATE DIVISION
COSTS
INVALIDATE
DESIGNATING PETITION
FAILURE
PERTINENT
TIME-STAMP
SEPARATE BOOK ENTRY
BOOK ENTRY INDICATING
GREEN CONTENDS
INDISPENSABLE COMPONENT
DINAPOLI ARGUES
BOARD EMPLOYEE


   2 No. 175
   In the Matter of Bonnie Green,
   Respondent,
   v.
   Thomas P. DiNapoli, et al.,
   Appellants, The Board of Elections of the County of Nassau, et al.,
   Respondents.
     _________________________________________________________________

   2001 NY Int. 103

   August 30, 2001

   This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before
   publication in the New York Reports.

   Steven R. Schlesinger, for appellants.
   Kenneth A. Auerbach, for individual respondent.
     _________________________________________________________________
     _________________________________________________________________

   MEMORANDUM:

   The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, without costs,
   and the order of Supreme Court reinstated.

   Respondent Green brought this proceeding to invalidate a designating
   petition and certificate of acceptance nominating DiNapoli as a
   candidate of the Independence Party for the office of Nassau County
   Executive. The central issue is whether DiNapoli satisfied the filing
   requirement of Election Law § 6-144 which specifies that such
   documents must be filed in the office of the Board of Elections, and
   further states, in relevant part: "All such petitions and certificates
   shall at the time of filing thereof be endorsed by such officer or
   board with the day, hour and minute of such filing. Such officer or
   board shall keep a book, which shall be open to public inspection in
   which shall be entered the times of filing all such petitions and
   certificates (and other pertinent data)." Failure to file within the
   time required is a fatal defect (Election Law § 1-106(2)).

   DiNapoli was required to file his certificate of acceptance with the
   Board of Elections on or before July 16, 2001. It is undisputed that
   he timely presented the certificate to an appropriate official at the
   Board of Elections shortly after 9:30 A.M. on July 16, but that the
   Board of Elections did not at that time endorse the certificate with
   the day, hour or minute of receipt. It is further undisputed that the
SNIPPETS:
  • This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York
  • Steven R. Schlesinger, for appellants.
  • Kenneth A. Auerbach, for individual respondent.
  • The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, without costs, and the order of
  • Respondent Green brought this proceeding to invalidate a designating petition and certificate
  • The central issue is whether DiNapoli satisfied the filing requirement of Election Law §
  • Such officer or board shall keep a book, which shall be open to public inspection in which
  • It is further undisputed that the official intended to time-stamp the certificate later that
  • Green contends that the endorsement is an indispensable component of filing and that this
  • DiNapoli argues that the endorsement by the Board is not a responsibility fairly placed on a
  • The Appellate Division reversed and invalidated DiNapoli's designating petition and
  • Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley, Rosenblatt and Graffeo concur.
  •    |