LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

TOWN OF LYSANDER v PAUL HAFNER, JR. et al Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, Plaintiff: TOWN OF LYSANDER, State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>I01_0112, Farm, Agriculture, Mobile Homes, Buildings, Farm Operations, Statute, Unreasonably Restrict, Protections, Legislature, Zoning, Land, Ordinance, Building Permits, York, Commissioner, Agricultural Districts, Local Governments, Housing, Public Health, Production, Summary Judgment, Farm Residential Buildings, Purposes, Safety, On-farm, Livestock, Directing , ContentID: 120248672

Case Documents
1 2001-10-18 OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 120582
5 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 5 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
AGRICULTURE
DEFENDANTS
MOBILE HOMES
BUILDINGS
LAW
FARM OPERATIONS
STATUTE
UNREASONABLY RESTRICT
PROTECTIONS
LEGISLATURE
ZONING
LAND
COURT
ORDINANCE
BUILDING PERMITS
YORK
COMMISSIONER
AGRICULTURAL DISTRICTS
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
HOUSING
PUBLIC HEALTH
PRODUCTION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
FARM RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS
PURPOSES
SAFETY
ON-FARM
LIVESTOCK
DIRECTING


   4 No. 126
   Town of Lysander,
   Respondent,
   v.
   Paul Hafner, Jr. et al.,
   Appellants.
     _________________________________________________________________

   2001 NY Int. 112

   October 18, 2001

   This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication
   in the New York Reports.

   Scott F. Chatfield, for appellants.
   P. David Twichell, for respondent.
   New York Farm Bureau; New York State Commissioner of Agriculture and
   Markets, amici curić.
     _________________________________________________________________

   LEVINE, J.:

   Defendants own and operate a commercial farm in the Town of Lysander,
   in an "agricultural district" created pursuant to Agriculture and
   Markets Law § 303. This case arises from defendants' attempt in 1999
   to install several single-wide mobile homes for housing migrant
   workers on the farm. The mobile homes do not comply with a Town zoning
   ordinance that "all one-story single family dwellings" have a minimum
   living area of 1,100 square feet (Town Zoning Code § 139-56(A)).

   The central issue before us is whether the zoning ordinance, as
   applied to defendants' installation of mobile homes to house migrant
   farm workers, is superseded by Agriculture and Markets Law
   305-a(1)(a). That statute provides:

     "1. Policy of local governments. a. Local governments, when
     exercising their powers to enact and administer comprehensive plans
     and local laws, ordinances, rules or regulations, shall exercise
     these powers in such manner as may realize the policy and goals set
     forth in this article, and shall not unreasonably restrict or
     regulate farm operations within agricultural districts in
     contravention of the purposes of this article unless it can be
     shown that the public health or safety is threatened" (emphasis
     supplied).

SNIPPETS:
  • This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York
  • New York State Commissioner of Agriculture and Markets,
  • Defendants own and operate a commercial farm in the Town of Lysander, in an "agricultural
  • This case arises from defendants' attempt in 1999 to install several single-wide mobile homes
  • The mobile homes do not comply with a Town zoning ordinance that "all one-story single family
  • Local governments, when exercising their powers to enact and administer comprehensive plans
  • The statute defines "arm operation" as "the land and on-farm buildings, equipment and
  • The Town then commenced this action for an injunction precluding defendants from using the
  • In support of their motion, they submitted a letter addressed to the Town from the Department
  • Supreme Court denied defendants' motion for summary judgment and granted summary judgment to
  • The court reasoned that Agriculture and Markets Law § 305-adid not "create an exemption from
  • The Legislature enacted Article 25-AA of the Agriculture and Markets Law in 1971 for the
  • At that time and again in 1987, the Legislature specifically found that "many of the
  • The courts below reasoned that, by deleting the phrase "farm residential buildings," the
  •    |