LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

MICHELLE HUANG, AS NEXT OF FRIEND OF RAYMOND YU, A MINOR v JOHN A. JOHNSON, COMMISSIONER FOR THE O Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, Plaintiff: MICHELLE HUANG, AS NEXT OF FRIEND OF RAYMOND YU, A MINOR, State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>I01_0118, Charge, Ocfs, Credit, Placement, Conviction, Culminate, Adjudication, Custody, Statutory, York, Unrelated Charge, Adjustment, Absence, Executive Law, Appellant, Reporting, Rights, Facility, Island, Amendment, Certification, Proviso, District, Arrest, Evening Reporting, Returning, Correction, Criminal Charge , ContentID: 120248663

Case Documents
1 2001-11-15 OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 120573
4 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 4 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
OCFS
CREDIT
PLACEMENT
COURT
CONVICTION
CULMINATE
ADJUDICATION
CUSTODY
STATUTORY
YORK
PLAINTIFF
UNRELATED CHARGE
ADJUSTMENT
ABSENCE
EXECUTIVE LAW
APPELLANT
REPORTING
RIGHTS
FACILITY
ISLAND
AMENDMENT
CERTIFICATION
PROVISO
DISTRICT
ARREST
EVENING REPORTING
RETURNING
CORRECTION
CRIMINAL CHARGE


   USCOA,2 No. 133
   Michelle Huang, as next of friend of Raymond Yu, a minor,
   Appellant,
   v.
   John A. Johnson, Commissioner for the Office of Children and Family
   Services, &c., et al.,
   Respondents.
     _________________________________________________________________

   2001 NY Int. 118

   November 15, 2001

   This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication
   in the New York Reports.

   Lawrence Katz, for appellant.
   David Lawrence III, for respondents.
     _________________________________________________________________

   LEVINE, J.:

   Plaintiff Michelle Huang commenced this Federal civil rights action
   alleging that her minor son, Raymond Yu, was falsely imprisoned.

   In 1996, Yu was adjudicated a juvenile delinquent for attempted
   assault in the second degree and placed for 18 months with the State
   Division for Youth, predecessor to the Office of Children and Family
   Services (OCFS). Yu's scheduled release date was September 13, 1997.

   Yu was placed in the Ella McQueen Residential Center, a limited secure
   facility. In January 1997, he was transferred to OCFS's Brooklyn
   Evening Reporting Center placement program, a transitional program for
   youths returning to their communities from residential centers. The
   program is less restrictive than a residential center in that it
   provides evening and weekend supervision but permits participants to
   live at home.

   One of the conditions of Yu's participation in the less restrictive
   program was that he report daily, which he failed to do on March 22
   and 23, 1997. Consequently, his release date was set back two days to
   account for his absence. Yu was again absent without leave for 96 days
   from March 28 until July 2, 1997, when OCFS discovered that he was in
   the custody of the New York City Department of Correction at Riker's
   Island, a City- operated jail facility, on unrelated charges of murder
   in the second degree and gang assault in the first degree, committed
SNIPPETS:
  • Lawrence Katz, for appellant.
  • Plaintiff Michelle Huang commenced this Federal civil rights action alleging that her minor
  • In 1996, Yu was adjudicated a juvenile delinquent for attempted assault in the second degree
  • In January 1997, he was transferred to OCFS's Brooklyn Evening Reporting Center placement
  • his release date was set back two days to account for his absence.
  • Yu was again absent without leave for 96 days from March 28 until July 2, 1997, when OCFS
  • The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York granted summary
  • The court concluded that the claim for money damages was barred by the Eleventh Amendment,
  • The court also denied the false imprisonment claim and held that Yu's term of confinement was
  • The court concluded that Huang's section 1983 claim for false imprisonment was not barred by
  • The court determined that an open question exists regarding whether section 510-brequires
  • That such custody arose from an arrest or surrender on another charge which did not culminate
  • Plaintiff argues that the statutory provision requires credit for detention time on "another
  • OCFS, on the other hand, reads section 510-bto provide for a credit only after the unrelated
  • "statutory grant to which a proviso is annexed should be read as if no power was given other
  • Following certification of a question by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second e days served at Riker's on an unrelated charge that did not culminate in a conviction until after
  •    |