LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

IN THE MATTER OF TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>I00_0109, Tax, Gross Earnings, Texas Eastern, Commerce Clause, York, Tax Appeals, Tax Law, Gas, York Sources, Constitution, Interstate, Transportation, Sales, Appellate Division, Apportionment, Affirm, Principles, Nationwide, Franchise Tax, Violates, United States, Natural Gas, Merchant, Gross Receipts, Dormant Commerce Clause, Judge, Pipeline, Revenue , ContentID: 120248428

Case Documents
1   OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 120338
4 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 4 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
GROSS EARNINGS
TEXAS EASTERN
COMMERCE CLAUSE
YORK
TAX APPEALS
TAX LAW
GAS
YORK SOURCES
CONSTITUTION
INTERSTATE
BUSINESS
TRANSPORTATION
SALES
APPELLATE DIVISION
COURT
APPORTIONMENT
AFFIRM
PRINCIPLES
NATIONWIDE
FRANCHISE TAX
VIOLATES
UNITED STATES
NATURAL GAS
MERCHANT
GROSS RECEIPTS
DORMANT COMMERCE CLAUSE
JUDGE
PIPELINE
REVENUE


   3 No. 98
   In the Matter of Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation,
   Appellant,
   v.
   Tax Appeals Tribunal et al.,
   Respondents.
     _________________________________________________________________

   2000 NY Int. 109

   October 19, 2000

   This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication
   in the New York Reports.

   Paul H. Frankel, for appellant.
   Andrew D. Bing, for respondents.
     _________________________________________________________________

   ROSENBLATT, J.:

   Tax Law §  186 is a franchise tax applicable to gas companies and
   others. In the appeal before us, Texas Eastern Transmission
   Corporation has challenged the tax as violative of the Commerce Clause
   of the United States Constitution. In essence, it asserts that section
   186 is an unapportioned gross earnings tax that unduly burdens
   interstate commerce. In response, the Commissioner of Taxation and
   Finance argues that Tax Law § 186 applies only to gross earnings
   from sources within the State of New York and therefore satisfies the
   fair apportionment requirements of the Commerce Clause. Because Texas
   Eastern has failed to demonstrate how taxation under section 186
   violates the Commerce Clause, we affirm the judgment of the Appellate
   Division.

   Texas Eastern is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of
   business in Houston, Texas. During the years in question (1989, 1990
   and 1991), it owned and operated a natural gas pipeline system
   spanning some 1,900 miles, extending from Texas to the midwest and
   northeast United States. Approximately 2.5 miles of the pipeline ran
   into New York, terminating at a meter and regulating station located
   on Staten Island. In its New York corporate tax returns, Texas Eastern
   reported total gross earnings of approximately $1.976 billion in 1989,
   $1.607 billion in 1990 and $1.443 billion in 1991. Section 186 taxed
   only the company's gross earnings from New York sources: approximately
   $136 million in 1989, $125 million in 1990 and $117 million in 1991.

SNIPPETS:
  • In the Matter of Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, Appellant, v. Tax Appeals Tribunal
  • Tax Law § 186 is a franchise tax applicable to gas companies and others.
  • Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation has challenged the tax as violative of the Commerce
  • it asserts that section 186 is an unapportioned gross earnings tax that unduly burdens
  • the Commissioner of Taxation and Finance argues that Tax Law § 186 applies only to gross
  • Because Texas Eastern has failed to demonstrate how taxation under section 186 violates the
  • During the years in question, it owned and operated a natural gas pipeline system spanning
  • Section 186 taxed only the company's gross earnings from New York sources: approximately $136
  • In 1994, the company sought a refund for those three years, contending that because,
  • the Division of Taxation applied a "gross receipts test" to the company's nationwide revenue
  • Texas Eastern appealed to the Division of Tax Appeals, pressing its argument that it was,
  • Though phrased as a positive grant of regulatory power to Congress, the United States Supreme
  • Addressing the dormant Commerce Clause, our analysis begins with Complete Auto Transit v
  • As one commentator explained, "f every state could tax the entirety of a company's business,
  • In the proceedings below and in its briefs to this Court, Texas Eastern challenged the tax
  • Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith,
  •    |