LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

IN THE MATTER OF LOLA YARBOUGH v RUBEN FRANCO, ET Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, Plaintiff: IN THE MATTER OF LOLA YARBOUGH, State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>I00_0114, Vacate, Ny2d, Determination, Petitioner, Matter, York, Authority, Review, Limitations, Reasons, Administrative Determination, Request, Ad2d, Statute, Tenant, York City, Proceeding, Reasonable Time, York State, Appellants, Housing, Terminate, Tenancy, Judicial Review, Motion, Hearing Officer, Received Notice, Paragraph, Seeking Review , ContentID: 120248418

Case Documents
1 2000-10-26 OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 120328
4 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 4 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
NY2D
DETERMINATION
PETITIONER
MATTER
YORK
AUTHORITY
REVIEW
LIMITATIONS
REASONS
ADMINISTRATIVE DETERMINATION
REQUEST
AD2D
STATUTE
TENANT
YORK CITY
PROCEEDING
COURT
REASONABLE TIME
YORK STATE
APPELLANTS
HOUSING
TERMINATE
TENANCY
JUDICIAL REVIEW
MOTION
HEARING OFFICER
RECEIVED NOTICE
PARAGRAPH
SEEKING REVIEW


   2 No. 101
   In the Matter of Lola Yarbough,
   Respondent,
   v.
   Ruben Franco, et al.,
   Appellants.
     _________________________________________________________________

   2000 NY Int. 114

   October 26, 2000

   This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication
   in the New York Reports.

   Henry Schoenfeld, for appellants.
   Mimi Rosenberg, for respondent.
   New York City Public Housing Resident Alliance, amicus curiæ.
     _________________________________________________________________

   CIPARICK, J.:

   At issue on this appeal is whether the four-month Statute of
   Limitations for challenging the denial of a tenant's request to vacate
   a New York City Housing Authority default determination accrues upon
   entry of the default or upon denial of the tenant's request to vacate
   it. We conclude that the limitations period begins to run from receipt
   of the denial of the request to vacate the default.

   Petitioner Lola Yarbough is a tenant in a low-income housing project
   owned by respondent New York City Housing Authority. In May 1996, the
   Authority sought to terminate petitioner's tenancy, charging her with
   violating its rules by allowing unauthorized family members to reside
   with her. After several adjournments, a hearing was scheduled for
   November 29, 1996. When petitioner failed to appear on that date, the
   Hearing Officer entered a default determination and sustained the
   charges. Although the default was entered on December 3, 1996, the
   Authority did not serve notice of it until on or about April 1, 1997.

   Petitioner received the notice on April 7, 1997 and the next day filed
   a request to vacate the default pursuant to paragraph 8 of the
   Authority's Termination of Tenancy Procedures,(1) maintaining that
   she never received notice of the November 29, 1996 adjournment. Months
   later, by decision dated June 24, 1997 and sent to petitioner by mail,
   the Authority denied her request as untimely.

SNIPPETS:
  • This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York
  • Henry Schoenfeld, for appellants.
  • At issue on this appeal is whether the four-month Statute of Limitations for challenging the
  • In May 1996, the Authority sought to terminate petitioner's tenancy, charging her with
  • When petitioner failed to appear on that date, the Hearing Officer entered a default
  • Petitioner received the notice on April 7, 1997 and the next day filed a request to vacate
  • On October 31, 1997, petitioner commenced this article 78 proceeding seeking review of both
  • In dismissing her petition as time-barred, Supreme Court concluded that petitioner was
  • It further concluded that petitioner's application to vacate the default was made within a
  • An article 78 proceeding must be commenced within four months after the administrative
  • An administrative determination becomes "final and binding" when the petitioner seeking
  • However, the fact that a determination is final for the purpose of its present execution does
  • Judicial review of administrative determinations is confined to the "facts and record adduced
  • We reject the Authority's argument that a motion to vacate a default is nothing more than a
  • Paragraph 8 of the Authority's procedures permits a tenant to apply "within a reasonable time
  • If the tenant fails to answer or appear at the hearing the Hearing Officer shall note the
  •    |