LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

ALEXANDRA BUCKLEY, et al. v SUN and SURF BEACH CLUB, INC Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, Plaintiff: ALEXANDRA BUCKLEY, et al., State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>I00_0126, Beach Club, Memorandum, Motion, Summary Judgment, Judge, Appellants, Nails, Accident, Lifeguard, Dissenting, Buckley, Sun, Surf Beach Club, Respondent, York, Levine, Costs, Finger, Jumping, Protruding, Injury, Existence, Constructive Notice, Risk, Harm, Rosenblatt, Manner, Liability , ContentID: 120248409

Case Documents
1 2000-11-21 OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 120319
2 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
MEMORANDUM
MOTION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JUDGE
APPELLANTS
NAILS
ACCIDENT
PLAINTIFF
LIFEGUARD
DEFENDANT
DISSENTING
BUCKLEY
SUN
SURF BEACH CLUB
RESPONDENT
YORK
LEVINE
COSTS
FINGER
JUMPING
PROTRUDING
INJURY
EXISTENCE
CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE
RISK
HARM
ROSENBLATT
MANNER
LIABILITY


   2 No. 135
   Alexandra Buckley, et al.,
   Appellants,
   v.
   Sun and Surf Beach Club, Inc.,
   Respondent.
     _________________________________________________________________

   2000 NY Int. 126

   November 21, 2000

   This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before
   publication in the New York Reports.

   Fred J. Hirsh, for appellants.
   Robert J. Levine, for respondent.
   Defense Association of New York, Inc., amicus curiæ.
     _________________________________________________________________
     _________________________________________________________________

   MEMORANDUM:

   The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs,
   and defendant's motion for summary judgment denied.

   A portion of the infant-plaintiff's finger was severed when, in
   jumping off an unattended, elevated lifeguard's stand at defendant's
   beach club, the ring on that finger caught on a nail protruding from
   the stand. The accident happened at about 10:45 p.m. on September 1,
   1995, while plaintiff was attending an end- of-summer party at the
   club. In opposing defendant's motion for summary judgment, plaintiffs
   submitted evidentiary proof in admissible form setting forth the
   following facts: although the beach was closed for swimming daily at
   not later than 7 p.m., when the lifeguards went off duty, children of
   club members frequently played on the beach after hours, and climbed
   on and jumped off the lifeguard stand. The club's management was
   actually aware that this practice "had been going on for years." A
   child who had accompanied plaintiff when the accident occurred
   described having seen nails "sticking up out of the wood" of the
   stand, including the one that caused the injury, on the many times
   when he had climbed onto the stand during that summer.

   The foregoing proof created triable issues of fact concerning (1)
   whether the existence of the protruding nails created a dangerous
   condition in the lifeguard stand which defendant knew children
SNIPPETS:
  • Alexandra Buckley, et al., Appellants, v. Sun and Surf Beach Club, Inc., Respondent.
  • This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York
  • Fred J. Hirsh, for appellants.
  • Robert J. Levine, for respondent.
  • The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and defendant's motion
  • A portion of the infant-plaintiff's finger was severed when, in jumping off an unattended,
  • A child who had accompanied plaintiff when the accident occurred described having seen nails
  • The foregoing proof created triable issues of fact concerning whether the existence of the
  • If the risk of harm was foreseeable, the particular manner in which the injury occurred here
  • Buckley v Sun and Surf Beach Club No. 135
  • Rosenblatt, J. (dissenting):
  • Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Levine, Ciparick and Wesley concur.
  • Judge Rosenblatt dissents and votes to affirm in a memorandum.
  •    |