LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

WEIZEL v USINTERNETWORKING INC Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: WVUI167248, Plaintiff: WEIZEL, State: NY New York, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>WVUI167248, Usinternetworking, Securities, Act, Commissions, Underwriter Defendants, Exchange, York, Stock, Price, Offering, Reports, Suisse First Boston, Ipo, Shares, Material Facts, Misleading, Common Stock, Class Period, Prospectus, Goldman Sachs Group, Violations, Wall Street, Investment Banks, Participation, Materially False, Regulation, Robertson Stephens, After-market , ContentID: 120248401

Case Documents
1 1999-04-08 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 120310
40 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 40 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
USINTERNETWORKING
SECURITIES
PLAINTIFF
ACT
COMMISSIONS
UNDERWRITER DEFENDANTS
EXCHANGE
YORK
STOCK
PRICE
OFFERING
REPORTS
SUISSE FIRST BOSTON
IPO
SHARES
MATERIAL FACTS
MISLEADING
COMMON STOCK
CLASS PERIOD
PROSPECTUS
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP
VIOLATIONS
WALL STREET
INVESTMENT BANKS
PARTICIPATION
MATERIALLY FALSE
REGULATION
ROBERTSON STEPHENS
AFTER-MARKET
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
 SETH WEIZEL, on behalf of himself and all others
 similarly situated,                                            CIVIL ACTION NO.
                           Plaintiff,                           CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
                            v.                                  FOR VIOLATIONS OF FEDERAL
                                                                SECURITIES LAWS
 USINTERNETWORKING, INC.;
 CHRISTOPHER R. MCCLEARY; STEPHEN E.                            JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
 MCMANUS; ANDREW A. STERN; CREDIT
 SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP.; THE BEAR
 STEARNS COMPANIES INC.; DEUTSCHE
 BANC ALEX. BROWN INCORPORATED;
 FLEETBOSTON ROBERTSON STEPHENS,
 INC; CIBC WORLD MARKETS; THE
 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC.; and J.P.
 MORGAN CHASE & CO.,

                           Defendants.

        Plaintiff, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, by

attorneys, for plaintiff's Complaint, allege upon the investigation made by and through plaintiff's

which  included,  inter  alia,  a  review  of  relevant  filings  made  by  USinternetworking,  Inc.

("USinternetworking" or the "Company") with the Securities and Exchange Commission, as well as,

conferences, press releases, news articles, analyst reports, and media reports concerning the

Furthermore, this complaint is based upon plaintiff's personal knowledge as to plaintiff  and

acts, and upon information and belief as to all other matters, based upon the aforementioned

                                         NATURE OF THE ACTION
        1.       This is a class action on behalf of all persons, other than defendants and certain

parties, who purchased, converted, exchanged or otherwise acquired USinternetworking common stock,

as defined below, including, but not limited to, during the period from April 8, 1999 through

2000 (the "Class Period")  to recover damages caused by defendants' violations of the federal

law.
        2.       In the wake of the raging bull market of the 1990's lies a series of

malfeasance by major Wall Street securities firms.  As reported in national news sources such as

York  Times,  The Wall Street Journal, and  Fortune  Magazine,  prosecutors  in  New  York  and
SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
  • BROWN INCORPORATED; FLEETBOSTON ROBERTSON STEPHENS,
  • which included, inter alia, a review of relevant filings made by USinternetworking, Inc.
  • with the Securities and Exchange Commission, as well as, teleconferences, press releases,
  • this complaint is based upon plaintiff's personal knowledge as to plaintiff and plaintiff's
  • This is a class action on behalf of all persons, other than defendants and certain related
  • 2000 to recover damages caused by defendants' violations of the federal securities
  • malfeasance by major Wall Street securities firms.
  • enforcement officials at the Securities and Exchange Commission are examining at least two
  • investment banks charged issuers of new securities excessive commissions and inflated
  • Second, investigators are examining, and have evidence, that major investment banks
  • allocated shares of especially hot initial public offerings to favored,
  • for promises by these customers that they would purchase additional shares of the IPOs in the
  • of the investigation is defendant investment bank Credit Suisse First Boston Corp.,
  • the IPO boom include Morgan Stanley Dean Witter and Goldman Sachs Groups,
  • and maintain the price of the IPOs in the aftermarket once the initial distribution period
  • stock price, above the offering price, and create a false sense of demand that would attract
  • obtain allocations of stock on the offering - - but before the first after-market trade.
  • Securities Act of 1933 15 U.S.C. §§ 77k, 77land 77o and Sections 10and
  • including the preparation and dissemination in this judicial district of the Prospectus
  • defendants USinternetworking, which documents were materially false and misleading, during
  • Period (including the trading of USinternetworking stock based upon misleading information).
  • the underwriter defendants conduct substantial business in this district.
  • managing underwriter of the USinternetworking initial public offering of 6,000,000 shares of
  • The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., as successor in interests to Goldman, Sachs &
  • USinternetworking's common stock has been actively traded during the Class Period on
  • In direct contravention to Rules 101 and 102 of Regulation M of the Exchange Act,
  • with direct participation and agreement of USinternetworking and the Individual Defendants.
  • disclose the following material facts,
  •    |