LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

WEINER v PALM INC Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: WVPI83928, Plaintiff: WEINER, State: NY New York, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>WVPI83928, Palm, Securities, Underwriter Defendants, Commissions, Exchange, Price, Offering, Stock, York, Banks, Morgan Stanley, Reports, Ipo, Credit Suisse First, Shares, Material Facts, Manipulated Securities, Suisse First Boston, Sub-class Period, Misleading, Common Stock, Prospectus, Investment Banks, Participation, Violations, Wall Street, Regulation, Materially False , ContentID: 120248399

Case Documents
1   COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 120308
45 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 45 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SECURITIES
PLAINTIFF
DEFENDANTS
UNDERWRITER DEFENDANTS
COMMISSIONS
EXCHANGE
PRICE
OFFERING
STOCK
YORK
BANKS
MORGAN STANLEY
REPORTS
IPO
CREDIT SUISSE FIRST
SHARES
MATERIAL FACTS
MANIPULATED SECURITIES
SUISSE FIRST BOSTON
SUB-CLASS PERIOD
MISLEADING
COMMON STOCK
PROSPECTUS
INVESTMENT BANKS
PARTICIPATION
VIOLATIONS
WALL STREET
REGULATION
MATERIALLY FALSE
 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

     MATTHEW WEINER, on behalf of himself and
     all others similarly situated,
                                                                   CIVIL ACTION NO.
                                Plaintiffs,
                                                                   CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
                                 v.                                FOR VIOLATIONS OF
     PALM, INC. CARL YANKOWSKI, JUDY                               FEDERAL SECURITIES
     BRUNER, THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP,                              AND ANTI-TRUST LAWS
     INC., BANCBOSTON ROBERTSON
     STEPHENS, INC., MERRILL LYNCH,                                JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
     PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH,
     INCORPORATED, MORGAN STANLEY
     DEAN WITTER & CO.; BANK OF
     AMERICA SECURITIES LLC; CHASE
     SECURITIES, INC.; DEUTSCHE BANK
     SECURITIES, INC.; SALOMON SMITH
     BARNEY, INC.; BEAR STEARNS, & CO.,
     INC.; B.T. ALEX. BROWN, INC.; CIBC
     WORLD MARKETS;  DAIN RAUCHER,
     INC.; CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON
     CORP.; J.P. MORGAN & CO.; J.P. MORGAN
     SECURITIES; LEHMAN BROTHERS, INC.;
     HAMBRECHT & QUIST LLC;  and ROBERT
     FLEMING, INC.

                                Defendants.

               Plaintiff, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, by

attorneys, for his Complaint, allege upon the investigation made by and through plaintiff's counsel,

which included, inter alia, a review of relevant filings made by Palm, Inc. ("Palm" or the

with the Securities and Exchange Commission, as well as, tele-conferences, press releases, news

articles, analyst reports, and media reports concerning the Company.  Furthermore, this complaint is

based upon plaintiff's personal knowledge as to himself and his own acts, and upon information and

belief as to all other matters, based upon the aforementioned investigation.

                                         NATURE OF THE ACTION



SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
  • PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INCORPORATED, MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER & CO.; BANK OF AMERICA
  • Plaintiff, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, by his
  • which included, inter alia, a review of relevant filings made by Palm, Inc.
  • articles, analyst reports, and media reports concerning the Company.
  • This is a class action on behalf of all persons, other than defendants and certain related
  • both dates inclusive (the "Sub-Class Period") to recover damages caused by defendants'
  • The Underwriter Defendants engaged and conspired to engage in conduct in connection
  • Manipulated Securities include Palm common stock.
  • malfeasance by major Wall Street securities firms.
  • enforcement officials at the Securities and Exchange Commission are examining at least two
  • Second, investigators are examining, and have evidence, that major investment banks
  • allocated shares of especially hot initial public offerings to favored,
  • Probes Inflated Commissions for Hot
  • investigation is defendant investment bank Credit Suisse First Boston Corp., a unit of Credit
  • the IPO boom include Morgan Stanley Dean Witter and Goldman Sachs Groups,
  • and maintain the price of the IPOs in the aftermarket once the initial distribution period
  • stock price, above the offering price, and create a false sense of demand that would attract
  • including the preparation and dissemination in this judicial district of the Prospectus dated
  • shareholders of defendants Palm, which documents were materially false and misleading, during
  • Period (including the trading of Palm stock based upon misleading information).
  • such control to cause the Company to engage in the violations and improper practices
  • Manipulated Securities omitted and/ or misrepresented material facts about the offering of
  • In direct contravention to Rules 101 and 102 of Regulation M of the Exchange Act,
  • participation and agreement of Palm and the Individual Defendants.
  •    |