LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

WEEKS v TICKETS.COM INC Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: WVTCI115955, CourtName: ESTION VIOLATED THIS COURT S DECISIO, Plaintiff: WEEKS, State: NY New York, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>WVTCI115955, Tixx, Securities, Act, Commissions, Underwriter Defendants, Exchange, Price, Stock, Offering, York, Reports, Suisse First Boston, Shares, Ipo, Morgan Stanley, Material Facts, Credit Suisse, Misleading, Common Stock, Class Period, Prospectus, Investment Banks, Manipulation, Violations, Participation, Regulation, After-market, Materially False , ContentID: 120248398

Case Documents
1 1999-11-03 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 120307
38 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 38 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
TIXX
SECURITIES
PLAINTIFF
ACT
COMMISSIONS
UNDERWRITER DEFENDANTS
EXCHANGE
PRICE
STOCK
OFFERING
YORK
REPORTS
SUISSE FIRST BOSTON
SHARES
IPO
MORGAN STANLEY
MATERIAL FACTS
CREDIT SUISSE
MISLEADING
COMMON STOCK
CLASS PERIOD
PROSPECTUS
INVESTMENT BANKS
MANIPULATION
VIOLATIONS
PARTICIPATION
REGULATION
AFTER-MARKET
MATERIALLY FALSE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

     JAMES WEEKS, on behalf of himself and all others
     similarly situated,
                                                                    CIVIL ACTION NO.
                              Plaintiff,
                                                                    CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
                                v.                                  FOR VIOLATIONS OF FEDERAL
                                                                    SECURITIES LAWS
     TICKETS.COM, INC., W. THOMAS GIMPLE,
     JOHN MARKOVICH, THOMAS PASCOE;                                 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
     CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP.;
     MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER & CO.;
     and SG COWEN SECURITIES
     CORPORATION,

                              Defendants.

            Plaintiff, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, by

attorneys, for plaintiff's Complaint, allege upon the investigation made by and through plaintiff's

which included,  inter  alia, a review of relevant filings made by Tickets.com, Inc. ("TIXX" or the

"Company") with the Securities and Exchange Commission, as well as, tele-conferences, press

news articles, analyst reports, and media reports concerning the Company.  Furthermore, this

is based upon plaintiff's personal knowledge as to plaintiff  and plaintiff's own acts, and upon

and belief as to all other matters, based upon the aforementioned investigation.

                                             NATURE OF THE ACTION

            1.       This is a class action on behalf of all persons, other than defendants and

parties, who purchased, converted, exchanged or otherwise acquired TIXX common stock, as defined

below, including, but not limited to, during the period from November 3, 1999 through December 6,

(the "Class Period")  to recover damages caused by defendants' violations of the federal securities



           2.     In the wake of the raging bull market of the 1990's lies a series of

alleged malfeasance by major Wall Street securities firms.  As reported in national news sources

SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
  • CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP.; MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER & CO.;
  • Plaintiff, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, by plaintiff's
  • which included, inter alia, a review of relevant filings made by Tickets.com, Inc. ("TIXX" or
  • "Company") with the Securities and Exchange Commission, as well as, tele-conferences, press
  • news articles, analyst reports, and media reports concerning the Company.
  • This is a class action on behalf of all persons, other than defendants and certain related
  • to recover damages caused by defendants' violations of the federal securities law.
  • investment banks charged issuers of new securities excessive commissions and inflated
  • Second, investigators are examining, and have evidence, that major investment banks
  • exchange for promises by these customers that they would purchase additional shares of the
  • after-market, thereby inflating and maintaining the market price for the IPOs.
  • of the investigation is defendant investment bank Credit Suisse First Boston Corp.,
  • participation in the IPO market and after-market trading.
  • inflation in the IPO stock price, above the offering price, and create a false sense of
  • obtain allocations of stock on the offering - - but before the first after-market trade.
  • Securities Act of 1933 15 U.S.C. '' 77k, 77land 77o and Sections 10and
  • including the preparation and dissemination in this judicial district of the Prospectus
  • reports to shareholders of defendants TIXX, which documents were materially false and
  • during the Class Period (including the trading of TIXX stock based upon misleading
  • the underwriter defendants conduct substantial business in this district.
  • managing underwriter of the TIXX initial public offering of 6,700,000 shares of common stock
  • Manipulated Securities omitted and/or misrepresented material facts about the offering of
  • In direct contravention to Rules 101 and 102 of Regulation M of the Exchange Act,
  • participation and agreement of TIXX and the Individual Defendants.
  • violation of Regulation M, which governs market manipulation.
  •    |