LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

BUNCH v WINN Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: BVW61848, Plaintiff: BUNCH, State: NY New York, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>BVW61848, America, Securities, Stock, Act, Fleetboston, Commissions, Common Stock, Exchange, Price, Underwriter, Reports, Offering, Ipo, Shares, Material Facts, Misleading, Prospectus, Class Period, Manipulation, Violations, Regulation, Investment Banks, After-market, Participation, Materially False, Wall Street, United States, Compensation , ContentID: 120248138

Case Documents
1 1999-04-08 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 119963
39 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 39 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
AMERICA
SECURITIES
STOCK
PLAINTIFF
ACT
FLEETBOSTON
COMMISSIONS
COMMON STOCK
EXCHANGE
PRICE
UNDERWRITER
REPORTS
OFFERING
IPO
SHARES
MATERIAL FACTS
MISLEADING
PROSPECTUS
CLASS PERIOD
MANIPULATION
VIOLATIONS
REGULATION
INVESTMENT BANKS
AFTER-MARKET
PARTICIPATION
MATERIALLY FALSE
WALL STREET
UNITED STATES
COMPENSATION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

     HOWARD BUNCH, on behalf of himself and all
     others similarly situated,
                                                                    CIVIL ACTION NO.
                               Plaintiff,
                                                                    CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
                                    v.                              FOR VIOLATIONS OF FEDERAL
                                                                    SECURITIES LAWS
     CRAIG WINN; REX SCATENA; THOMAS
     MORGAN; GLENDA DORCHAK; DEAN                                   JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
     JOHNSON and FLEETBOSTON ROBERTSON
     STEPHENS, INC.,

                               Defendants.

            Plaintiff, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, by

attorneys, for plaintiff's Complaint, allege upon the investigation made by and through plaintiff's

which included, inter alia, a review of relevant filings made by Value America, Inc. ("Value

"Company") with the Securities and Exchange Commission, as well as, tele-conferences, press

news articles, analyst reports, and media reports concerning the Company.  Furthermore, this

is based upon plaintiff's personal knowledge as to plaintiff  and plaintiff's own acts, and upon

and belief as to all other matters, based upon the aforementioned investigation.

                                              NATURE OF THE ACTION

            1.       This is a class action on behalf of all persons, other than defendants and

parties, who purchased, converted, exchanged or otherwise acquired Value America common stock, as

defined below, including, but not limited to, during the period from April 8, 1999 through December

2000 (the "Class Period")  to recover damages caused by defendants' violations of the federal

law.



           2.     In the wake of the raging bull market of the 1990's lies a series of

alleged malfeasance by major Wall Street securities firms.  As reported in national news sources

SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
  • JOHNSON and FLEETBOSTON ROBERTSON
  • Plaintiff, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, by plaintiff's
  • which included, inter alia, a review of relevant filings made by Value America, Inc. ("Value
  • "Company") with the Securities and Exchange Commission, as well as, tele-conferences, press
  • news articles, analyst reports, and media reports concerning the Company.
  • This is a class action on behalf of all persons, other than defendants and certain related
  • parties, who purchased, converted, exchanged or otherwise acquired Value America common
  • 2000 (the "Class Period") to recover damages caused by defendants' violations of the federal
  • alleged malfeasance by major Wall Street securities firms.
  • investment banks charged issuers of new securities excessive commissions and inflated
  • Second, investigators are examining, and have evidence, that major investment banks
  • exchange for promises by these customers that they would purchase additional shares of the
  • after-market, thereby inflating and maintaining the market price for the IPOs.
  • Credit Suisse emerged as a leading underwriter of technology
  • participation in the IPO market and after-market trading.
  • inflation in the IPO stock price, above the offering price, and create a false sense of
  • obtain allocations of stock on the offering - - but before the first after-market trade.
  • Securities Act of 1933 15 U.S.C. '' 77k, 77land 77o and Sections 10and
  • shareholders of Value America, which documents were materially false and misleading, during
  • Period (including the trading of Value America stock based upon misleading information).
  • Value America and exercised such control to cause the Company to engage in the violations and
  • Prospectus and Registration Statement dated April 8,
  • Manipulated Securities omitted and/or misrepresented material facts about the offering of
  • at the major underwriting firms garnered as much as $100 million a year in compensation.
  • In direct contravention to Rules 101 and 102 of Regulation M of the Exchange Act,
  • employed manipulation and/or deceptive devices or contrivances to
  •    |