 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
AMICUS BRIEF
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COURT FEDERATION PUNITIVE DAMAGES AWARD COMPENSATORY DAMAGES FEDERAL CIRCUIT BMW PETITIONER MANDATE RULE APPEALS PET HARM APP TXO JUSTIFY POTENTIAL HARM EVIDENCE UNITED STATES AMICUS AUTHORITIES REVIEW CHAMBER AMOUNT REMAND COOPER CONTINGENT GUIDEPOSTS DISTRICT COURT SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE |
No. 01-172
In the Supreme Court of the United States
BIOMET, INC.,
Petitioner,
v.
DR. RAYMOND G. TRONZO,
Respondent.
On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
BRIEF FOR THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS AMICUS
CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER
ROBIN S. CONRAD EVAN M. TAGER
National Chamber Litigation Counsel of Record
Center, Inc. Mayer, Brown & Platt
1615 H Street, N.W. 1909 K Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20062 Washington, D.C. 20006
(202) 463-5337 (202) 263-3240
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
TABLE OF AUTHORITIESii
INTEREST OF THE AMICUS CURIAE1
ARGUMENT1
CONCLUSION8
SNIPPETS:
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
