LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

UNITED STATES v FRANKLIN W BISHOP Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: USVFWB171186, CourtCode: FED, CourtName: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff: UNITED STATES, State: CA California, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>USVFWB171186, Mail Order, Mail Order Rule, Consent Decree, United States, Act, Violation, Federal Trade Commission, Merchandise, Ftc Act, Federal Trade, Northern District, Civil Penalties, Buyer, Complaint, Telephone Order, Practices, Entry, Sale, Refund, San Francisco, Parties, Purposes, Employees, Statement Setting, Settlement, Commission, Injunction, Relief, Authorizes, Monetary Civil Penalties, Proper, Customers, Consumer, Hereby, Compliance, Western Region, Paid, Solicitation, Award, Basis , ContentID: 120248070

Case Documents
1   REASONS FOR SETTLEMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 119824
1 pages
HTML
2   COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 119822
5 pages
HTML
3 2000-05 CONSENT DECREE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 119823
5 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 3 documents , 11 pages
Price: $ 29.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . REASONS FOR SETTLEMENT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANT
COMMISSION
CONSENT DECREE
MAIL ORDER
REASONS
ACTS
PRACTICES
ENTRY
FRANKLIN
BISHOP
PENALTIES
ENGAGING
TRADE
MERCHANDISE
PAYMENT
REDRESS
RESOURCES
CIVIL PENALTIES
COMMISSION NOTES
LIMITED RESOURCES
REIMBURSE
BUYER
PAID
SHIPMENT
ASSURE COMPLIANCE
LAW
EXPENSE
LITIGATION
FOREGOING REASONS
                           REASONS FOR SETTLEMENT

   This statement accompanies the Consent Decree executed by defendant
   Franklin W. Bishop, an individual doing business as Minidiscnow.com,
   in settlement of an action brought to recover penalties and other
   equitable relief from the defendant for engaging in acts or practices
   in violation of the Commission's Trade Regulation Rule Concerning Mail
   or Telephone Order Merchandise, 16 C.F.R. Part 435 ("Mail Order
   Rule").

   Pursuant to Section 5(m)(3) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, as
   amended (15 U.S.C. § 45(m)(3)), the Commission hereby sets forth its
   reasons for settlement by entry of a Consent Decree and injunction:

   On the basis of the allegations contained in the attached Complaint,
   the Commission believes that the payment of full consumer redress by
   the defendant, rather than the payment of civil penalties, constitutes
   an appropriate means upon which to base a settlement. The Commission
   notes the defendant's limited resources, and believes that those
   resources are most appropriately used to reimburse each buyer who has
   ordered and paid for, but has not received, shipment of any item of
   merchandise. Full redress should assure compliance with the law by
   defendant and by others who engage in practices covered by the Mail
   Order Rule. Further, defendant is permanently enjoined from engaging
   in acts or practices that are prohibited by the Mail Order Rule. With
   the entry of such Consent Decree the time and expense of litigation
   will be avoided.

   For the foregoing reasons, the Commission believes that the settlement
   by entry of the attached Consent Decree with Franklin W. Bishop is
   justified and well within the public interest.
SNIPPETS:
  • REASONS FOR SETTLEMENT
  • This statement accompanies the Consent Decree executed by defendant Franklin W. Bishop, an
  • Pursuant to Section 5of the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended ), the Commission hereby
  • On the basis of the allegations contained in the attached Complaint, the Commission believes
  • The Commission notes the defendant's limited resources, and believes that those resources are
  • Full redress should assure compliance with the law by defendant and by others who engage in
  • defendant is permanently enjoined from engaging in acts or practices that are prohibited by
  • With the entry of such Consent Decree the time and expense of litigation will be avoided.
  • For the foregoing reasons, the Commission believes that the settlement by entry of the

  • 2 . COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    MAIL ORDER
    ACT
    DEFENDANT
    VIOLATION
    FTC ACT
    CIVIL PENALTIES
    UNITED STATES
    ATTORNEY
    PLAINTIFF
    COURT
    SALE
    REFUND
    NORTHERN DISTRICT
    COMPLAINT
    FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
    MERCHANDISE
    PRACTICES
    INJUNCTION
    RELIEF
    AUTHORIZES
    MONETARY CIVIL PENALTIES
    TELEPHONE ORDER
    PROPER
    CUSTOMERS
    CONSUMER
    SOLICITATION
    BUYER
    AWARD
    SHIP
    
       ROBERT S. MUELLER, III
       United States Attorney
       Northern District of California
    
       Assistant United States Attorney
       450 Golden Gate Ave., Box 36055
       San Francisco, CA. 94102
       (415) 436-7200
    
                        IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                          NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
    
                        UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
    
                                         v.
    
        FRANKLIN W. BISHOP, an individual doing business as Minidiscnow.com,
                                     Defendant.
    
                                      CASE NO.
             COMPLAINT FOR CIVIL PENALTIES, INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER RELIEF
    
       Plaintiff, the United States of America, acting upon notification and
       authorization to the Attorney General by the Federal Trade Commission
       ("Commission"), for its complaint alleges that:
    
       1. Plaintiff brings this action under Sections 5(a)(1), 5(m)(1)(A),
       13(b), 16(a) and 19 of the Federal Trade Commission Act ("FTC Act"),
       15 U.S.C. §§ 45(a)(1), 45(m)(1)(A), 53(b), 56(a) and 57b, to obtain
       monetary civil penalties and injunctive and other relief for
       defendant's violations of the Commission's Trade Regulation Rule
       Concerning the Sale of Mail or Telephone Order Merchandise (the "Mail
       Order Rule" or "Rule"), 16 C.F.R. Part 435.
    
                               JURISDICTION AND VENUE
    
       2. This Court has jurisdiction over this matter under 28 U.S.C.
       1331, 1337(a), 1345, and 1355 and under 15 U.S.C. §§ 45(m)(1)(A),
       53(b), 56(a) and 57b. This action arises under 15 U.S.C. § 45(a)(1).
    
       3. Venue in the Northern District of California is proper under 15
       U.S.C. § 53(b) and under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b-c) and 1395(a).
    
                                     DEFENDANT
    
       4. Defendant Franklin W. Bishop is sole proprietor and owner of
       Minidiscnow.com, located at 1000 W. Texas Street, Suite H, Fairfield,
       CA 94533. Individually or in concert with others, he has formulated,
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • United States Attorney Northern District of California
  • IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
  • UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
  • COMPLAINT FOR CIVIL PENALTIES, INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER RELIEF
  • Plaintiff, the United States of America, acting upon notification and authorization to the
  • Plaintiff brings this action under Sections 5, 5, 13, 16and 19 of the Federal Trade
  • Individually or in concert with others, he has formulated, directed, controlled, supervised,
  • Defendant sells minidisc audio equipment and accessories over the Internet, representing that
  • Defendant has little or no knowledge of when the supplier in Japan will actually ship the
  • Defendant has never instituted procedures to comply with the Mail Order Rule.
  • When customers contact defendant to inquire about the status of a late order, defendant
  • The Mail Order Rule was promulgated by the Commission on October 22, 1975, under the FTC Act,
  • At all times material herein, defendant has engaged in the mail order sale and telephone
  • Violated Section 435.1of the Rule by soliciting orders for the sale of telephone or mail
  • Violated Section 435.1of the Rule by providing to the buyer a revised shipping date when he
  • Pursuant to Section 18of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 57a, a violation of the Mail Order Rule
  • CIVIL PENALTIES, CONSUMER REDRESS AND INJUNCTION
  • Each sale or attempted sale, during the five years preceding the filing of this complaint, in
  • Section 19 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 57b, authorizes the Court to award such relief as is
  • Award plaintiff such additional relief as the Court may deem just and proper.

  • 3 . CONSENT DECREE

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    CONSENT DECREE
    FEDERAL TRADE
    MAIL ORDER
    MAIL ORDER RULE
    UNITED STATES
    ATTORNEY
    FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
    MERCHANDISE
    SAN FRANCISCO
    BUSINESS
    NORTHERN DISTRICT
    PARTIES
    PURPOSES
    BUYER
    EMPLOYEES
    STATEMENT SETTING
    COURT
    PLAINTIFF
    COMPLAINT
    HEREBY
    TELEPHONE ORDER
    COMPLIANCE
    ENTRY
    WESTERN REGION
    BASIS
    PROMPT REFUND
    SUCCESSORS
    PAID
    VIOLATING
    
       ROBERT S. MUELLER, III
       United States Attorney
       Northern District of California
    
       Assistant United States Attorney
       450 Golden Gate Ave., Box 36055
       San Francisco, CA. 94102
       (415) 436-7200
    
                        IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                          NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
    
                        UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
    
                                         v.
    
        FRANKLIN W. BISHOP, an individual doing business as Minidiscnow.com,
                                     Defendant.
    
                                      CASE NO.
              CONSENT DECREE AND ORDER FOR INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER RELIEF
    
       WHEREAS plaintiff, the United States of America, has commenced this
       action by filing the Complaint herein; defendant has waived service of
       the Summons and Complaint; the parties have been represented by the
       attorneys whose names appear hereafter; and the parties have agreed to
       settlement of this action upon the following terms and conditions,
       without adjudication of any issue of fact or law and without defendant
       admitting liability for any of the matters alleged in the Complaint;
    
       THEREFORE, on the joint motion of plaintiff and defendant, it is
       hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows:
    
       1. This Court has jurisdiction of the subject matter and of the
       parties.
    
       2. The Complaint states a claim upon which relief may be granted
       against the defendant under Sections 5(a)(1), 5(m)(1)(A), 13(b), 16(a)
       and 19 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 45(a)(1),
       45(m)(1)(A), 53(b), 56(a) and 57b.
    
                                     DEFINITION
    
       For the purposes of this Consent Decree, the term "Mail Order Rule"
       means the Federal Trade Commission's Trade Regulation Rule Concerning
       Mail or Telephone Order Merchandise, 16 C.F.R. Part 435, or as the
       Rule may hereafter be amended.
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • United States Attorney Northern District of California
  • UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
  • FRANKLIN W. BISHOP, an individual doing business as Minidiscnow.com,
  • CONSENT DECREE AND ORDER FOR INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER RELIEF
  • WHEREAS plaintiff, the United States of America, has commenced this action by filing the
  • THEREFORE, on the joint motion of plaintiff and defendant, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED,
  • This Court has jurisdiction of the subject matter and of the parties.
  • For the purposes of this Consent Decree, the term "Mail Order Rule" means the Federal Trade
  • Defendant Franklin W. Bishop, his successors and assigns, shall, within fifteen business days
  • Defendant shall, within thirty calendar days after service of this Order, reimburse each
  • 2, Defendant, his successors and assigns, and his agents, servants, employees and attorneys,
  • Providing to the buyer a revised shipping date unless they have a reasonable basis for making
  • Failing to deem an order canceled and make a prompt refund to buyers who are entitled to such
  • In the event the Mail Order Rule is hereafter amended or modified, defendant's compliance
  • Defendant shall, within thirty days of the entry of this Consent Decree, provide a copy of on, 901 Market Street, San Francisco, CA 94103, setting forth the fact and manner of his
  • a specimen copy of each delay option notice used for purposes of complying with any provision
  •    |