LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

IN RE LONDON INTERNATIONAL GROUP INC Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: IRLIGI185575, CourtCode: FED, CourtName: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, State: NJ New Jersey, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>IRLIGI185575, Respondent, Commission, Condoms, Complaint, Federal Trade Commission, Representation, Ramses, Brand, London International Group, Agreement, Violation, Advertisements, Strength, Practices, Acts, Paragraph, Successors, Substantiation, Affecting, Report, Alleges, Exhibit, Terminate, Consent Order, Trade Commission Act, Representations, Draft Complaint, Acceptance, Officers, Provisions, Facts, Possesses, Act, Advertisement Depicts, Sensitivity, Thereafter, Jurisdiction, Evidence, Condom , ContentID: 120247846

Case Documents
1   DECISION & ORDER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 119010
5 pages
HTML
2   COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 119008
3 pages
HTML
3 2000-05 CONSENT AGREEMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 119009
10 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 3 documents , 18 pages
Price: $ 29.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . DECISION & ORDER

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COMMISSION
COMPLAINT
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
REPRESENTATION
LONDON INTERNATIONAL GROUP
VIOLATION
ACT
SUCCESSORS
THEREAFTER
AGREEMENT
JURISDICTION
EVIDENCE
CONDOM
TERMINATE
AFFECTING
REPORT
APPEALING
MANNER
SALE
CONSUMER PROTECTION
RULING
PRACTICES
CONSENT
JURISDICTIONAL FACTS
MATTER
PURSUANT
RELIABLE SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE
PROCEEDING
COMPETENT
                                                                  9623004
                                                                  B236679

                          UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                      BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

   COMMISSIONERS:
          Robert Pitofsky, Chairman
          Mary L. Azcuenaga
          Sheila F. Anthony
          Mozelle W. Thompson
          Orson Swindle

                             In the Matter of

              LONDON INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC., a corporation.

                             DOCKET NO. C-3800

                             DECISION AND ORDER

   The Federal Trade Commission having initiated an investigation of
   certain acts and practices of the respondent named in the caption
   hereof, and the respondent having been furnished thereafter with a
   copy of a draft of complaint which the San Francisco Regional Office
   proposed to present to the Commission for its consideration and which,
   if issued by the Commission, would charge respondent with violation of
   the Federal Trade Commission Act; and

   The respondent and counsel for the Commission having thereafter
   executed an agreement containing a consent order, an admission by the
   respondent of all the jurisdictional facts set forth in the aforesaid
   draft of complaint, a statement that the signing of said agreement is
   for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by
   respondent that the law has been violated as alleged in such
   complaint, or that the facts as alleged in such complaint, other than
   jurisdictional facts, are true and waivers and other provisions as
   required by the Commission's Rules; and

   The Commission having thereafter considered the matter and having
   determined that it had reason to believe that the respondent has
   violated the said Act, and that a complaint should issue stating its
   charges in that respect, and having thereupon accepted the executed
   consent agreement and placed such agreement on the public record for a
   period of sixty (60) days, and having duly considered the comments
   filed thereafter by interested persons pursuant to § 2.34 of its
   Rules, now in further conformity with the procedure prescribed in
   2.34 of its Rules, the Commission hereby issues its complaint, makes
SNIPPETS:
  • BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
  • The Federal Trade Commission having initiated an investigation of certain acts and practices
  • The respondent and counsel for the Commission having thereafter executed an agreement s, are true and waivers and other provisions as required by the Commission's Rules;
  • The Commission having thereafter considered the matter and having determined that it had rmity with the procedure prescribed in § 2.34 of its Rules, the Commission hereby issues its
  • Respondent London International Group, Inc., is a corporation organized, existing, and doing
  • The Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this proceeding and of
  • "Competent and reliable scientific evidence" shall mean tests, analyses, research, studies,
  • "In or affecting commerce" shall mean as defined in Section 4 of the Federal Trade Commission
  • IT IS ORDERED that respondent, directly or through any corporation, subsidiary, division, or
  • The comparative or quantifiable strength of any condom;
  • The comparative or quantifiable efficacy of any condom, unless, at the time it is made,
  • that respondent shall not be deemed in violation of Part I of this Order for any
  • Provided, however, that clearance of a report submitted under 21 U.S.C. § 360shall not be
  • IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent London International Group, Inc. and its successors and
  • IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent London International Group, Inc. and its successors and or practices subject to this order; the proposed filing of a bankruptcy petition; or a change in
  • All notices required by this Part shall be sent by certified mail to the Associate Director,
  • Provided, further, that if such complaint is dismissed or a federal court rules that the or ruling is upheld on appeal.

  • 2 . COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    RAMSES
    BRAND
    RESPONDENT
    FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
    TRADE COMMISSION ACT
    ADVERTISEMENTS
    STRENGTH
    REPRESENTATIONS
    PARAGRAPH
    EXHIBIT
    ADVERTISEMENT DEPICTS
    SENSITIVITY
    SUBSTANTIATE
    REPRESENTATIONS SET
    LONDON INTERNATIONAL GROUP
    REASON
    ALLEGES
    PRACTICES
    COMPLAINT
    AFFECTING COMMERCE
    STRONGER
    TRUSTED COMPANION
    REGULAR STRENGTH CONDOMS
    INDIVIDUAL CONDOM WRAPPER
    VIOLATION
    DUREX RAMSES
    PREMIUM CONDOM LATEX
    WALLET
    IMPLICATION
    
                                                                      9623004
                                                                      B236679
    
                              UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                              FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
    
                                  In the Matter of
    
                  LONDON INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC., a corporation.
    
                                 DOCKET NO. C-3800
    
                                     COMPLAINT
    
       The Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that London
       International Group, Inc., a corporation, has violated the provisions
       of the Federal Trade Commission Act, and it appearing to the
       Commission that this proceeding is in the public interest, alleges:
    
       1. Respondent London International Group, Inc. is a New Jersey
       corporation with its principal office or place of business at 3585
       Engineering Drive, Norcross, Georgia 30092.
    
       2. Respondent has manufactured, advertised, labeled, offered for sale,
       sold, and distributed products to the public, including "Ramses" brand
       condoms. Ramses brand condoms are "devices," within the meaning of
       Sections 12 and 15 of the Federal Trade Commission Act.
    
       3. The acts and practices of respondent alleged in this complaint have
       been in or affecting commerce, as "commerce" is defined in Section 4
       of the Federal Trade Commission Act.
    
       4. Respondent has disseminated or has caused to be disseminated
       advertisements for Ramses brand condoms, including but not necessarily
       limited to the attached Exhibits A through C. These advertisements
       contain the following statements and depictions:
    
         A. "it won't give you X-ray vision or bionic strength. but it will
         make you a hero tonight. Ramses* gives you the sensitivity and
         natural feeling you want. and because it's 30% stronger than the
         leading brand, it performs like a champ. so you can too. RamsesŪ. a
         trusted companion. *RamsesŪ regular strength condoms."
    
         (The advertisement depicts an individual condom wrapper labeled:
         "RAMSES CONDOM") (Exhibit A).
    
         B. "WOMEN PREFER THE STRONG SENSITIVE TYPE. Ramses provides both
         strength and sensitivity with that exquisite natural feel. And 30%
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • The Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that London International Group, Inc.,
  • Respondent London International Group, Inc. is a New Jersey corporation with its principal
  • Ramses brand condoms are "devices," within the meaning of Sections 12 and 15 of the Federal
  • The acts and practices of respondent alleged in this complaint have been in or affecting
  • Respondent has disseminated or has caused to be disseminated advertisements for Ramses brand
  • "it won't give you X-ray vision or bionic strength.
  • *RamsesŪ regular strength condoms."
  • (Exhibit A).
  • Ramses provides both strength and sensitivity with that exquisite natural feel.
  • A Trusted Companion.
  • (The advertisement depicts an individual condom wrapper labeled: "durex RAMSES 1 PREMIUM
  • An empty wallet can be a beautiful thing.
  • Ramses brand condoms are thirty percent stronger than the leading brand.
  • Through the means described in Paragraph 4, respondent has represented, expressly or by
  • Respondent submitted inadequate data to substantiate its claim that Ramses brand condoms are
  • The acts and practices of respondent as alleged in this complaint constitute unfair or

  • 3 . CONSENT AGREEMENT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    COMMISSION
    CONDOMS
    COMPLAINT
    REPRESENTATION
    FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
    RAMSES
    BRAND
    AGREEMENT
    ACTS
    LONDON INTERNATIONAL GROUP
    SUBSTANTIATION
    ADVERTISEMENTS
    STRENGTH
    VIOLATION
    CONSENT ORDER
    PRACTICES
    DRAFT COMPLAINT
    ACCEPTANCE
    OFFICERS
    ALLEGES
    PROVISIONS
    AFFECTING
    REPORT
    FACTS
    SUCCESSORS
    POSSESSES
    PARAGRAPH
    TERMINATE
    EXHIBIT
    
                            UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                            FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
    
                                            ))
          In the Matter of                         )    FILE NO. 962 3004
                                                   )
    LONDON INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.,       )           AGREEMENT CONTAINING
         a corporation.                     )           CONSENT ORDER
                                                   )
                                            )
    
          The Federal Trade Commission has conducted an investigation
    of certain acts and practices of London International Group,
    Inc., a corporation ("proposed respondent").  Proposed
    respondent, having been represented by counsel, is willing to
    enter into an agreement containing a consent order resolving the
    allegations contained in the attached draft complaint.
    Therefore,
    
          IT IS HEREBY AGREED by and between London International
    Group, Inc., by its duly authorized officers, and counsel for the
    Federal Trade Commission that:
    
    1.    Proposed respondent London International Group, Inc. is a
    New Jersey corporation with its principal office or place of
    business at 3585 Engineering Drive, Norcross, Georgia 30092.
    
    2.    Proposed respondent admits all the jurisdictional facts set
    forth in the draft complaint.
    
    3.    Proposed respondent waives:
    
          a.      Any further procedural steps;
    
          b.      The requirement that the Commission's decision contain
                  a statement of findings of fact and conclusions of law;
                  and
    
          c.      All rights to seek judicial review or otherwise to
                  challenge or contest the validity of the order entered
                  pursuant to this agreement.
    
    4.    This agreement shall not become part of the public record of
    the proceeding unless and until it is accepted by the Commission.
    If this agreement is accepted by the Commission, it, together
    with the draft complaint, will be placed on the public record for
    a period of sixty (60) days and information about it publicly
    released.  The Commission thereafter may either withdraw its
    acceptance of this agreement and so notify proposed respondent,
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • The Federal Trade Commission has conducted an investigation of certain acts and practices of
  • Proposed respondent, having been represented by counsel, is willing to enter into an
  • Group, Inc., by its duly authorized officers, and counsel for the Federal Trade Commission
  • The Commission thereafter may either withdraw its acceptance of this agreement and so notify
  • This agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by
  • This agreement contemplates that, if it is accepted by the Commission, and if such acceptance
  • No agreement, understanding, representation, or interpretation not contained in the order or
  • It understands that it may be liable for civil penalties in the amount provided by law and
  • "In or affecting commerce" shall mean as defined in Section 4 of the Federal Trade Commission
  • Provided, however, that clearance of a report submitted under 21 U.S.C. § 360shall not be
  • IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent London International Group, Inc. and its successors and
  • Provided, further, that if such complaint is dismissed or a federal court rules that the or ruling is upheld on appeal.
  • Respondent has manufactured, advertised, labeled, offered for sale, sold, and distributed
  • Respondent has disseminated or has caused to be disseminated advertisements for Ramses brand
  • it won't give you X-ray vision or bionic strength.
  • (Exhibit A).
  • the complaint alleges that the respondent did not possess adequate substantiation for claims
  • Part I of the proposed order would prohibit the respondent from making any claim about: the
  •    |