LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

IN RE JORE CORP Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: IRJC73026, CourtCode: FED, CourtName: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, State: MT Montana, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>IRJC73026, Respondent, Commission, Complaint, Jore Corporation, Federal Trade Commission, Representation, United States, Agreement, Proposed Order, Violation, Proposed Respondent, Successors, Act, Practices, Consumer Protection, Packaging, Officers, Terminate, Appealing, Power Tool Accessories, Exhibit, Draft Complaint, Labeling, Sale, Ruling, Proposed Consent Order, Acceptance, Manufacturing, Hex Shank Wood, Shank Wood Boring, Global Components, Paragraph, Consent Order, Facts, Jurisdiction, Directors , ContentID: 120247828

Case Documents
1   DECISION & ORDER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 118937
4 pages
HTML
2   CONSENT AGREEMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 118936
5 pages
HTML
3   COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 118935
3 pages
HTML
5 2000-05 ANALYSIS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 118934
1 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 5 documents , 16 pages
Price: $ 39.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . DECISION & ORDER

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COMMISSION
COMPLAINT
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
REPRESENTATION
JORE CORPORATION
UNITED STATES
VIOLATION
SUCCESSORS
ACT
CONSUMER PROTECTION
AGREEMENT
JURISDICTION
DIRECTORS
TERMINATE
APPEALING
RULING
PRACTICES
THEREAFTER
CONSENT
JURISDICTIONAL FACTS
MATTER
OFFICERS
LABELING
SALE
EMPLOYEES
MANUFACTURING
ADVERTISING
PROMOTION
COMMERCE
                                                                 002 3237

                          UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                      BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

   COMMISSIONERS:
          Robert Pitofsky, Chairman
          Sheila F. Anthony
          Mozelle W. Thompson
          Orson Swindle
          Thomas B. Leary

                              In the Matter of

                      JORE CORPORATION, a corporation.

                             DOCKET NO. C-4004

                             DECISION AND ORDER

   The Federal Trade Commission having initiated an investigation of
   certain acts and practices of the respondent named in the caption
   hereof, and the respondent having been furnished thereafter with a
   copy of a draft complaint which the Bureau of Consumer Protection
   proposed to present to the Commission for its consideration and which,
   if issued by the Commission, would charge respondent with violations
   of the Federal Trade Commission Act; and

   The respondent, its attorney, and counsel for the Commission having
   thereafter executed an agreement containing a consent order, and
   admission by the respondent of all the jurisdictional facts set forth
   in the draft complaint, a statement that the signing of said agreement
   is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission
   by respondent that the law has been violated as alleged in such
   complaint, or that the facts as alleged in such complaint, other than
   jurisdictional facts, are true, and waivers and other provisions as
   required by the Commission's Rules; and

   The Commission having thereafter considered the matter and having
   determined that it had reason to believe that the respondent violated
   the said Act, and that a complaint should issue stating its charges in
   that respect, and having thereupon accepted the executed consent
   agreement and placed such agreement on the public record for a period
   of thirty (30) days, now in further conformity with the procedure
   prescribed in Section 2.34 of its Rules, the Commission hereby issues
   its complaint, makes the following jurisdictional findings, and enters
   the following order:

SNIPPETS:
  • BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
  • The Federal Trade Commission having initiated an investigation of certain acts and practices
  • The Commission having thereafter considered the matter and having determined that it had the following jurisdictional findings, and enters the following order:
  • Respondent Jore Corporation is a Montana corporation with its principal office or place of
  • The Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this proceeding and of
  • IT IS ORDERED that respondent, Jore Corporation, a corporation, its successors and assigns, t, in any manner, directly or by implication, the extent to which any such product is made in the
  • PROVIDED, however, that a representation that any such product is made in the United States
  • PROVIDED FURTHER, that nothing in the order shall prohibit respondent from depleting the
  • IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent Jore Corporation, and its successors and assigns,
  • All tests, reports, studies, surveys, demonstrations, or other evidence in their possession
  • IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent Jore Corporation, and its successors and assigns, shall
  • IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent Jore Corporation, and its successors and assigns, shall subject to this order; the proposed filing of a bankruptcy petition; or a change in the corporate
  • Provided, further, that if such complaint is dismissed or a federal court rules that the or ruling is upheld on appeal.

  • 2 . CONSENT AGREEMENT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    COMMISSION
    COMPLAINT
    PROPOSED RESPONDENT
    FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
    JORE CORPORATION
    AGREEMENT
    REPRESENTATION
    DRAFT COMPLAINT
    UNITED STATES
    ACCEPTANCE
    VIOLATION
    SUCCESSORS
    CONSENT ORDER
    COUNSEL
    OFFICERS
    FACTS
    MANNER
    CONSUMER PROTECTION
    TERMINATE
    APPEALING
    LABELING
    SALE
    RULING
    ACTS
    PRACTICES
    LAW
    PURSUANT
    PROCEEDING
    NOTIFY
    
                              UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                          BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
    
                                  In the Matter of
    
                          JORE CORPORATION, a corporation.
    
                                  FILE NO. 0023237
                         AGREEMENT CONTAINING CONSENT ORDER
    
       The Federal Trade Commission has conducted an investigation of certain
       acts and practices of Jore Corporation, a corporation ("proposed
       respondent"). Proposed respondent, having been represented by counsel,
       is willing to enter into an agreement containing a consent order
       resolving the allegations contained in the attached draft complaint.
       Therefore,
    
       IT IS HEREBY AGREED by and between Jore Corporation, by its duly
       authorized officers, and counsel for the Federal Trade Commission
       that:
    
              1. Proposed respondent Jore Corporation is a Montana
              corporation with its principal office or place of business at
              45000 Highway 93 South, Ronan, Montana 59864.
              2. Proposed respondent admits all the jurisdictional facts set
              forth in the draft complaint.
              3. Proposed respondent waives:
    
                    a. Any further procedural steps;
    
                    b. The requirement that the Commission's decision contain
                    a statement of findings of fact and conclusions of law;
                    and
    
                    c. All rights to seek judicial review or otherwise to
                    challenge or contest the validity of the order entered
                    pursuant to this agreement.
    
              4. This agreement shall not become part of the public record of
              the proceeding unless and until it is accepted by the
              Commission. If this agreement is accepted by the Commission,
              it, together with the draft complaint, will be placed on the
              public record for a period of thirty (30) days and information
              about it publicly released. The Commission thereafter may
              either withdraw its acceptance of this agreement and so notify
              proposed respondent, in which event it will take such action as
              it may consider appropriate, or issue and serve its complaint
              (in such form as the circumstances may require) and decision in
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • The Federal Trade Commission has conducted an investigation of certain acts and practices of
  • Proposed respondent, having been represented by counsel, is willing to enter into an
  • IT IS HEREBY AGREED by and between Jore Corporation, by its duly authorized officers, and
  • The Commission thereafter may either withdraw its acceptance of this agreement and so notify
  • This agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by
  • This agreement contemplates that, if it is accepted by the Commission, and if such acceptance ut it public.
  • When so entered, the order shall have the same force and effect and may be altered, modified,
  • No agreement, understanding, representation, or interpretation not contained in the order or
  • It understands that it may be liable for civil penalties in the amount provided by law and
  • IT IS ORDERED that respondent, Jore Corporation, a corporation, its successors and assigns, t, in any manner, directly or by implication, the extent to which any such product is made in the
  • PROVIDED FURTHER, that nothing in the order shall prohibit respondent from depleting the
  • IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent Jore Corporation, and its successors and assigns,
  • All tests, reports, studies, surveys, demonstrations, or other evidence in their possession
  • This order will terminate twenty years from the date of its issuance, or twenty years from
  • Provided, further, that if such complaint is dismissed or a federal court rules that the or ruling is upheld on appeal.

  • 3 . COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
    POWER TOOL ACCESSORIES
    EXHIBIT
    ACT
    UNITED STATES
    JORE CORPORATION
    PACKAGING
    HEX SHANK WOOD
    SHANK WOOD BORING
    GLOBAL COMPONENTS
    PARAGRAPH
    REPRESENTATION
    ALLEGES
    PRACTICES
    COMPLAINT
    AFFECTING COMMERCE
    STANLEY/JORETECH
    REPRESENTATION SET
    AMERICA
    VIOLATION
    MONTANA
    MANUFACTURING
    CRAFTSMAN SPEED-LOK
    IMPLICATION
    TRUTH
    MISLEADING
    LABOR
    SIGNIFICANT PORTION
    FOREIGN ORIGIN
    
                                                                     002 3237
    
                              UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                          BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
    
                                  In the Matter of
    
                          JORE CORPORATION, a corporation.
    
                                 DOCKET NO. C-4004
    
                                     COMPLAINT
    
       The Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that Jore
       Corporation ("respondent") has violated the provisions of the Federal
       Trade Commission Act, and it appearing to the Commission that this
       proceeding is in the public interest, alleges:
    
       1. Respondent Jore Corporation is a Montana corporation with its
       principal office or place of business at 45000 Highway 93 South,
       Ronan, Montana 59864.
    
       2. Respondent has manufactured, advertised, labeled, offered for sale,
       sold, and distributed products to the public, including power tool
       accessories.
    
       3. The acts and practices of respondent alleged in this complaint have
       been in or affecting commerce, as "commerce" is defined in Section 4
       of the Federal Trade Commission Act.
    
       4. Respondent has disseminated or has caused to be disseminated
       packaging for certain of its products, including but not necessarily
       limited to the attached Exhibits A through C. The packaging contains
       the following statements or depictions:
    
              A. Craftsman Speed-Lok, 7/16" Hex Shank Wood Boring Bit (½"),
              Exhibit A
              "Made in USA"
              B. Craftsman Speed-Lok, 7/16" Hex Shank Wood Boring Bit (1"),
              Exhibit B
              "Made in USA"
              C. Stanley/JoreTech Fast Change Power Drilling and Driving Set,
              Exhibit C
    
    
               "Made in USA" in immediate conjunction with American flag (on
              front and two side panels)
              In small print on back of package, "Made in USA with Domestic
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
  • The Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that Jore Corporation has violated the
  • Respondent Jore Corporation is a Montana corporation with its principal office or place of
  • Respondent has manufactured, advertised, labeled, offered for sale, sold, and distributed
  • The acts and practices of respondent alleged in this complaint have been in or affecting
  • Respondent has disseminated or has caused to be disseminated packaging for certain of its
  • Craftsman Speed-Lok, 7/16" Hex Shank Wood Boring Bit, Exhibit A "Made in USA" B. Craftsman
  • "Made in USA" in immediate conjunction with American flag In small print on back of package,
  • Through the means described in Paragraph 4, notwithstanding the inconspicuous statement "Made n the United States.
  • In truth and in fact, a significant portion of the components of certain of respondent's
  • Therefore, the representation set forth in Paragraph 5 was, and is, false or misleading.
  • Stanley/JoreTech ¼" Hex Shank Wood Boring Bit,
  • Through the means described in Paragraph 7, respondent has represented, expressly or by
  • The acts and practices of respondent as alleged in this complaint constitute unfair or

  • 5 . ANALYSIS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    JORE CORPORATION
    PROPOSED CONSENT ORDER
    AGREEMENT
    RESPONDENT
    UNITED STATES
    COMMISSION
    PUBLIC RECORD
    PACKAGING
    CHARGES
    MISREPRESENTING
    PROVISION
    COMPLIANCE
    ENGAGING
    ACTS
    PRACTICES
    LABOR
    MANUFACTURING
    DISSEMINATING
    COMPANY OFFICIALS
    EMPLOYEES
    NOTIFY
    AFFECT COMPLIANCE OBLIGATIONS
    COMPLIANCE REPORTS
    PROVISION WHEREBY
    ABSENT
    TERMINATES
    ISSUANCE
    PURPOSE
    INTERPRETATION
    
                         Analysis of Proposed Consent Order
                               to Aid Public Comment
    
       The Federal Trade Commission has accepted an agreement, subject to
       final approval, to a proposed consent order from respondent Jore
       Corporation.
    
       The proposed consent order has been placed on the public record for
       thirty (30) days for reception of comments by interested persons.
       Comments received during this period will become part of the public
       record. After thirty (30) days, the Commission will again review the
       agreement and the comments received and will decide whether it should
       withdraw from the agreement and take other appropriate action or make
       final the agreement's proposed order.
    
       This matter concerns U.S. origin claims contained on packaging for
       certain Jore Corporation products, including power tool accessories.
       The Commission's complaint charges that respondents misrepresented on
       this packaging that the products were all or virtually all made in the
       United States. In truth and in fact, these products were actually made
       with significant foreign content and/or processing.
    
       The proposed consent order contains a provision that is designed to
       remedy the charges and to prevent the respondent from engaging in
       similar acts and practices in the future. Part I of the proposed order
       prohibits Jore Corporation from misrepresenting the extent to which
       any product is made in the United States. The proposed order would
       allow Jore Corporation to represent that such products are made in the
       United States as long as all, or virtually all, of the components of
       the products are of U.S. origin, and all, or virtually all, of the
       labor in manufacturing them is performed in the United States.
    
       Part II of the proposed order requires respondent to maintain
       materials relied upon in disseminating any representation covered by
       the order. Part III of the proposed order requires Jore Corporation to
       distribute copies of the order to certain company officials and
       employees. Part IV of the proposed order requires Jore Corporation to
       notify the Commission of any change in the corporation that may affect
       compliance obligations under the order. Part V of the proposed order
       requires Jore Corporation to file one or more compliance reports. Part
       VI of the proposed order is a provision whereby the order, absent
       certain circumstances, terminates twenty years from the date of
       issuance.
    
       The purpose of this analysis is to facilitate public comment on the
       proposed consent order. It is not intended to constitute an official
       interpretation of the agreement and proposed order or to modify in any
       way their terms.
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • The Federal Trade Commission has accepted an agreement, subject to final approval, to a
  • The proposed consent order has been placed on the public record for thirty days for reception
  • the Commission will again review the agreement and the comments received and will decide
  • The Commission's complaint charges that respondents misrepresented on this packaging that the
  • The proposed consent order contains a provision that is designed to remedy the charges and to
  • Part I of the proposed order prohibits Jore Corporation from misrepresenting the extent to
  • The proposed order would allow Jore Corporation to represent that such products are made in
  • Part II of the proposed order requires respondent to maintain materials relied upon in
  • Part III of the proposed order requires Jore Corporation to distribute copies of the order to
  • Part IV of the proposed order requires Jore Corporation to notify the Commission of any
  • Part V of the proposed order requires Jore Corporation to file one or more compliance reports.
  • Part VI of the proposed order is a provision whereby the order, absent certain circumstances,
  • The purpose of this analysis is to facilitate public comment on the proposed consent order.
  • It is not intended to constitute an official interpretation of the agreement and proposed
  •    |