LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

IN RE JOHNSON WORLDWIDE ASSOCIATES INC Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: IRJWAI196329, CourtCode: FED, CourtName: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, State: WI Wisconsin, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>IRJWAI196329, Respondent, Commission, Complaint, Fishing, Federal Trade Commission, Super Mono Fishing, United States, Package, Representation, Johnson Worldwide, Agreement, Super Mono, Japanese Components, American, Proposed Order, Proposed Respondent, Act, Violation, Successors, Exhibit, Practices, Picture, Labor, Officers, Consumer Protection, Ruling, Terminate, Appealing, Draft Complaint, Acts, Fishing Product, Acceptance, Proposed Consent Order, Advertisements, Manufacturing, Materials, Consent Order , ContentID: 120247826

Case Documents
1   DECISION & ORDER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 118930
4 pages
HTML
2   COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 118929
3 pages
HTML
3   ANALYSIS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 118928
2 pages
HTML
4 2000-05 AGREEMENT CONTAINING CONSENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 118927
5 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 4 documents , 14 pages
Price: $ 34.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . DECISION & ORDER

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COMMISSION
COMPLAINT
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
FISHING
REPRESENTATION
UNITED STATES
JOHNSON WORLDWIDE
ACT
VIOLATION
SUCCESSORS
CONSUMER PROTECTION
AGREEMENT
JURISDICTION
RULING
TERMINATE
APPEALING
MATERIALS
PRACTICES
THEREAFTER
CONSENT
JURISDICTIONAL FACTS
MATTER
OFFICERS
DIRECTORS
MANUFACTURING
SALE
ADVERTISING
PROMOTION
COMMERCE
                                                                  9923019
                                                                  B254538

                          UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                         FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

   COMMISSIONERS:
          Robert Pitofsky, Chairman
          Sheila F. Anthony
          Mozelle W. Thompson
          Orson Swindle

                              In the Matter of

             JOHNSON WORLDWIDE ASSOCIATES, INC. a corporation.

                             DOCKET NO. C-3862

                             DECISION AND ORDER

   The Federal Trade Commission having initiated an investigation of
   certain acts and practices of the respondent named in the caption
   hereof, and the respondent having been furnished thereafter with a
   copy of a draft complaint which the Bureau of Consumer Protection
   proposed to present to the Commission for its consideration and which,
   if issued by the Commission, would charge respondent with violations
   of the Federal Trade Commission Act; and

   The respondent, its attorney, and counsel for the Commission having
   thereafter executed an agreement containing a consent order, and
   admission by the respondent of all the jurisdictional facts set forth
   in the draft complaint, a statement that the signing of said agreement
   is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission
   by respondent that the law has been violated as alleged in such
   complaint, or that the facts as alleged in such complaint, other than
   jurisdictional facts, are true, and waivers and other provisions as
   required by the Commission's Rules; and

   The Commission having thereafter considered the matter and having
   determined that it had reason to believe that the respondent violated
   the said Act, and that a complaint should issue stating its charges in
   that respect, and having thereupon accepted the executed consent
   agreement and placed such agreement on the public record for a period
   of sixty (60) days, now in further conformity with the procedure
   prescribed in Section 2.34 of its Rules, the Commission hereby issues
   its complaint, makes the following jurisdictional findings, and enters
   the following order:

SNIPPETS:
  • FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
  • The Federal Trade Commission having initiated an investigation of certain acts and practices
  • The Commission having thereafter considered the matter and having determined that it had the following jurisdictional findings, and enters the following order:
  • Respondent Johnson Worldwide Associates, Inc. is a Wisconsin corporation with its principal
  • The Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this proceeding and of
  • IT IS ORDERED that respondent, Johnson Worldwide Associates, Inc., a corporation, its on Act, 15 U.S.C. § 44, shall not misrepresent, in any manner, directly or by implication, the
  • PROVIDED, however, that a representation that any fishing product is made in the United
  • PROVIDED, further, that respondent shall not make a general U.S. origin claim, whether or not U.S.C. § 1304.
  • All tests, reports, studies, surveys, demonstrations, or other evidence in their possession
  • IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent Johnson Worldwide Associates, Inc., and its successors
  • IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent Johnson Worldwide Associates, Inc., and its successors acts or practices subject to this order; the proposed filing of a bankruptcy petition; or a change
  • Provided, further, that if such complaint is dismissed or a federal court rules that the or ruling is upheld on appeal.

  • 2 . COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    SUPER MONO FISHING
    SUPER MONO
    JAPANESE COMPONENTS
    AMERICAN
    EXHIBIT
    RESPONDENT
    PICTURE
    FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
    ACT
    UNITED STATES
    ADVERTISEMENTS
    LABOR
    PARAGRAPH
    REPRESENTATION
    CATALOG
    ORDINARY CONSUMER
    COMPREHEND
    JOHNSON WORLDWIDE
    ALLEGES
    PRACTICES
    COMPLAINT
    AFFECTING COMMERCE
    JAPAN
    SPOOL
    LABELING
    REPRESENTATION SET
    MISLEADING
    PROMOTIONAL MATERIALS
    PAMPHLET
    
                                                                      9923019
                                                                      B254538
    
                              UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                              FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
    
                                  In the Matter of
    
                 JOHNSON WORLDWIDE ASSOCIATES, INC., a corporation.
    
                                 DOCKET NO. C-3862
    
                                     COMPLAINT
    
       The Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that Johnson
       Worldwide Associates, Inc. ("respondent") has violated the provisions
       of the Federal Trade Commission Act, and it appearing to the
       Commission that this proceeding is in the public interest, alleges:
    
       1. Respondent Johnson Worldwide Associates, Inc. is a Wisconsin
       corporation with its principal office or place of business at 1326
       Willow Road, Sturtevant, Wisconsin 53177.
    
       2. Respondent has advertised, labeled, offered for sale, sold, and
       distributed products to the public, including fishing line.
    
       3. The acts and practices of respondent alleged in this complaint have
       been in or affecting commerce, as "commerce" is defined in Section 4
       of the Federal Trade Commission Act.
    
       4. Respondent has disseminated or has caused to be disseminated
       packaging for its Spiderwire Super Mono Super Monofilament ("Super
       Mono") fishing line, including but not necessarily limited to the
       attached Exhibit A. The front panel of this packaging contains the
       following statement:
    
         "MADE IN THE USA of American and Japanese components."
    
       5. Through the means described in Paragraph 4, respondent has
       represented, expressly or by implication, that its Super Mono fishing
       line is made in the United States of American and Japanese components.
    
       6. In truth and in fact, the Super Mono fishing line is totally made
       in Japan with Japanese labor and components. Only the spool on which
       the fishing line is wrapped and the package, labeling, and package
       inserts contain American labor or components. Therefore, the
       representation set forth in Paragraph 5 was, and is, false or
       misleading.
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • The Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that Johnson Worldwide Associates,
  • Respondent Johnson Worldwide Associates, Inc. is a Wisconsin corporation with its principal
  • The acts and practices of respondent alleged in this complaint have been in or affecting
  • Respondent has disseminated or has caused to be disseminated packaging for its Spiderwire
  • Through the means described in Paragraph 4, respondent has represented, expressly or by
  • In truth and in fact, the Super Mono fishing line is totally made in Japan with Japanese
  • Only the spool on which the fishing line is wrapped and the package, labeling, and package
  • Therefore, the representation set forth in Paragraph 5 was, and is, false or misleading.
  • Respondent has disseminated or has caused to be disseminated advertisements and other
  • Picture of the Super Mono fishing line packaging.
  • Picture of the Super Mono fishing line package on the front cover of the pamphlet.
  • Picture of the Super Mono fishing line package on page 5 of the catalog.
  • The statement "of American and Japanese components" is not in a type size sufficiently large

  • 3 . ANALYSIS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    FISHING
    RESPONDENT
    UNITED STATES
    FISHING PRODUCT
    PROPOSED CONSENT ORDER
    AGREEMENT
    PACKAGING
    COMMISSION
    COMPLAINT CHARGES
    SUPER MONO FISHING
    LABOR
    COMPLIANCE
    PUBLIC RECORD
    ADVERTISING
    LABELING
    PRACTICES
    AMERICAN
    JAPANESE
    PROVISION
    ACTS
    MANUFACTURING
    MATERIALS
    ENGAGING
    FISHING RODS
    FISHING REELS
    FISHING LURES
    FISHING SPOONS
    ORIGIN CLAIM
    QUALIFYING INFORMATION
    
         _________________________________________________________________
    
                         Analysis of Proposed Consent Order
                               to Aid Public Comment
         _________________________________________________________________
    
       The Federal Trade Commission has accepted an agreement, subject to
       final approval, to a proposed consent order from respondent Johnson
       Worldwide Associates, Inc.
    
       The proposed consent order has been placed on the public record for
       sixty (60) days for reception of comments by interested persons.
       Comments received during this period will become part of the public
       record. After sixty (60) days, the Commission will again review the
       agreement and the comments received and will decide whether it should
       withdraw from the agreement and take other appropriate action or make
       final the agreement's proposed order.
    
       This matter concerns advertising, packaging, labeling, and promotional
       practices related to the sale of fishing line. The Commission's
       complaint charges that respondent misrepresented on packaging that its
       Super Mono fishing line is made in the United States of American and
       Japanese components. In addition, the complaint charges that
       respondent misrepresented in advertising that its Super Mono fishing
       line is all or virtually all made in the United States. In truth and
       in fact, the Super Mono fishing line is totally made in Japan with
       Japanese labor and components. Only the spool on which the fishing
       line is wrapped and the package, labeling, and package inserts contain
       American labor or components.
    
       The proposed consent order contains a provision that is designed to
       remedy the charges and to prevent the respondent from engaging in
       similar acts and practices in the future. Part I of the proposed order
       prohibits the respondent from misrepresenting the extent to which any
       fishing product is made in the United States. The order defines
       fishing products as any product that is intended to be used for
       fishing, including but not limited to fishing rods, fishing reels,
       fishing line, fishing lures, and fishing spoons. The proposed order
       would allow respondent to represent that such fishing products are
       made in the United States as long as all, or virtually all, of the
       components of the products are of U.S. origin and all, or virtually
       all, of the labor in manufacturing them is performed in the United
       States.
    
       The proposed order also provides that respondent shall not make a
       general U.S. origin claim, whether or not accompanied by qualifying
       information (e.g., "Made in U.S.A. of U.S. and imported parts" or
       "Manufactured in U.S. with imported materials") unless the fishing
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • The Federal Trade Commission has accepted an agreement, subject to final approval, to a
  • The proposed consent order has been placed on the public record for sixty days for reception
  • the Commission will again review the agreement and the comments received and will decide
  • The Commission's complaint charges that respondent misrepresented on packaging that its Super
  • the complaint charges that respondent misrepresented in advertising that its Super Mono
  • Only the spool on which the fishing line is wrapped and the package, labeling, and package
  • The proposed consent order contains a provision that is designed to remedy the charges and to
  • Part I of the proposed order prohibits the respondent from misrepresenting the extent to
  • The order defines fishing products as any product that is intended to be used for fishing,
  • The proposed order would allow respondent to represent that such fishing products are made in
  • The proposed order also provides that respondent shall not make a general U.S. origin claim,
  • Part II of the proposed order requires the respondent to maintain materials relied upon in
  • Part IV of the proposed order requires the respondent to notify the Commission of any change

  • 4 . AGREEMENT CONTAINING CONSENT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    COMMISSION
    COMPLAINT
    PROPOSED RESPONDENT
    FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
    AGREEMENT
    JOHNSON WORLDWIDE
    REPRESENTATION
    FISHING
    UNITED STATES
    DRAFT COMPLAINT
    OFFICERS
    ACCEPTANCE
    VIOLATION
    SUCCESSORS
    CONSENT ORDER
    ACTS
    COUNSEL
    FACTS
    MANNER
    RULING
    CONSUMER PROTECTION
    TERMINATE
    APPEALING
    PRACTICES
    LAW
    PURSUANT
    PROCEEDING
    NOTIFY
    SUBSTANCE
    
                              UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                          BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
    
                                 In the Matter of
    
                JOHNSON WORLDWIDE ASSOCIATES, INC. a corporation.
    
                                 FILE NO. 992-3019
    
                         AGREEMENT CONTAINING CONSENT ORDER
    
       The Federal Trade Commission has conducted an investigation of certain
       acts and practices of Johnson Worldwide Associates, Inc., a
       corporation ("proposed respondent"). Proposed respondent, having been
       represented by counsel, is willing to enter into an agreement
       containing a consent order resolving the allegations contained in the
       attached draft complaint. Therefore,
    
       IT IS HEREBY AGREED by and between Johnson Worldwide Associates, Inc.,
       by its duly authorized officers, and counsel for the Federal Trade
       Commission that:
    
       1. Proposed respondent Johnson Worldwide Associates, Inc. is a
       Wisconsin corporation with its principal office or place of business
       at 1326 Willow Road, Sturtevant, Wisconsin 53177.
    
       2. Proposed respondent admits all the jurisdictional facts set forth
       in the draft complaint.
    
       3. Proposed respondent waives:
    
              a. Any further procedural steps;
    
              b. The requirement that the Commission's decision contain a
              statement of findings of fact and conclusions of law; and
    
              c. All rights to seek judicial review or otherwise to challenge
              or contest the validity of the order entered pursuant to this
              agreement.
    
       4. This agreement shall not become part of the public record of the
       proceeding unless and until it is accepted by the Commission. If this
       agreement is accepted by the Commission, it, together with the draft
       complaint, will be placed on the public record for a period of sixty
       (60) days and information about it publicly released. The Commission
       thereafter may either withdraw its acceptance of this agreement and so
       notify proposed respondent, in which event it will take such action as
       it may consider appropriate, or issue and serve its complaint (in such
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • The Federal Trade Commission has conducted an investigation of certain acts and practices of
  • Proposed respondent, having been represented by counsel, is willing to enter into an
  • IT IS HEREBY AGREED by and between Johnson Worldwide Associates, Inc., by its duly authorized
  • All rights to seek judicial review or otherwise to challenge or contest the validity of the
  • The Commission thereafter may either withdraw its acceptance of this agreement and so notify
  • This agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by
  • This agreement contemplates that, if it is accepted by the Commission, and if such acceptance ut it public.
  • When so entered, the order shall have the same force and effect and may be altered, modified,
  • No agreement, understanding, representation, or interpretation not contained in the order or
  • It understands that it may be liable for civil penalties in the amount provided by law and
  • IT IS ORDERED that respondent, Johnson Worldwide Associates, Inc., a corporation, its on Act, 15 U.S.C. § 44, shall not misrepresent, in any manner, directly or by implication, the
  • All notices required by this Part shall be sent by certified mail to the Associate Director,
  • This order will terminate twenty years from the date of its issuance, or twenty years from
  • Provided, further, that if such complaint is dismissed or a federal court rules that the or ruling is upheld on appeal.
  •    |