LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

IN RE IVAX CORPORATION Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: IRIC116418, CourtCode: FED, CourtName: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, State: IN Indiana, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>IRIC116418, Commission, Prior Approval Policy, Reopening, Approval Policy Statement, Merger, Modify, Ivax, Request, Complaint, Act, Provision, Prior Notification, Federal Trade Commission, Market, Anticompetitive Merger, Presumption, Acquisition, Generic Verapamil, Matter, Deleting Paragraph, Narrow Prior, Respondent, Consent Order, Order Pursuant, Consistent, Proceeding, Reasons, Clayton Act, Reviewing, Credible Risk , ContentID: 120247818

Case Documents
1 1996-02-14 ORDER REOPENING AND MODIFYING ORDER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 118903
3 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 3 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . ORDER REOPENING AND MODIFYING ORDER

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PRIOR APPROVAL POLICY
REOPENING
APPROVAL POLICY STATEMENT
MERGER
MODIFY
IVAX
REQUEST
COMPLAINT
ACT
PROVISION
PRIOR NOTIFICATION
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
MARKET
ANTICOMPETITIVE MERGER
PRESUMPTION
ACQUISITION
GENERIC VERAPAMIL
MATTER
DELETING PARAGRAPH
NARROW PRIOR
RESPONDENT
CONSENT ORDER
ORDER PURSUANT
CONSISTENT
PROCEEDING
REASONS
CLAYTON ACT
REVIEWING
CREDIBLE RISK
                        UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                     BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

COMMISSIONERS:          Robert Pitofsky, Chairman
                        Mary L. Azcuenaga
                        Janet D. Steiger
                        Roscoe B. Starek, III
                        Christine A. Varney

                                   )
In the Matter of                       ))
IVAX Corporation,                      )             Docket No. C-3565
     a corporation.                    )
                                   )

                   ORDER REOPENING AND MODIFYING ORDER

     On February 14, 1996, IVAX Corporation ("IVAX" or
"Respondent"), the respondent named in the consent order issued
by the Commission on March 27, 1995, in Docket No. C-3565
("Order"), filed its Request To Reopen and Modify Consent Order
("Request") in this matter.  IVAX asks that the Commission reopen
and modify the Order pursuant to Section 5(b) of the Federal
Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(b), and Section 2.51 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 16 C.F.R. § 2.51,
and consistent with the Statement of Federal Trade Commission
Policy Concerning Prior Approval And Prior Notice Provisions,
issued on June 21, 1995 ("Prior Approval Policy Statement" or
"Statement").1  IVAX's Request asks that the Commission "reopen
the order issued on March 27, 1995, in this proceeding and modify
the Order by deleting Paragraph III."  Request at 1.  The thirty-
day public comment period on IVAX's Request ended on March 25,
1996.  No comments were received.  For the reasons discussed
below, the Commission has determined to grant IVAX's Request.

     The Commission, in its Prior Approval Policy Statement,
"concluded that a general policy of requiring prior approval is
no longer needed," citing the availability of the premerger
notification and waiting period requirements of Section 7A of the
Clayton Act, commonly referred to as the Hart-Scott-Rodino
("HSR") Act, 15 U.S.C. § 18a, to protect the public interest in
effective merger law enforcement.  Prior Approval Policy
Statement at 2.  The Commission announced that it will
"henceforth rely on the HSR process as its principal means of
learning about and reviewing mergers by companies as to which the

       60 Fed. Reg. 39745-47 (Aug. 3, 1995); 4 Trade Reg. Rep.
(CCH) ¶ 13,241.

SNIPPETS:
  • BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
  • ORDER REOPENING AND MODIFYING ORDER
  • On February 14, 1996, IVAX Corporation ("IVAX" or "Respondent"), the respondent named in the
  • IVAX asks that the Commission reopen and modify the Order pursuant to Section 5of the Federal h 27, 1995, in this proceeding and modify the Order by deleting Paragraph III." Request at 1.
  • For the reasons discussed below, the Commission has determined to grant IVAX's Request.
  • The Commission announced that it will "henceforth rely on the HSR process as its principal
  • Commission had previously found a reason to believe that the companies had engaged or
  • As a general matter, "Commission orders in such cases will not include prior approval or
  • The Commission stated that it will continue to fashion remedies as needed in the public
  • The Commission said in its Prior Approval Policy Statement that "a narrow prior approval
  • As explained in the Prior Approval Policy Statement, the need for a prior notification
  • "when a petition is filed to reopen and modify an order pursuant to.
  • the Commission will apply a rebuttable presumption that the public interest requires
  • The Complaint in this case charged that IVAX's proposed acquisition of all of the voting
  • The Complaint alleged that the acquisition would eliminate direct and actual competition
  • The presumption is that setting aside the general prior approval requirement in this Order is
  • the Commission has determined to reopen the proceedings and modify the Order by deleting
  •    |