LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

IN RE HAROLD A HONICKMAN Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: IRHAH113183, CourtCode: FED, CourtName: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, State: IN Indiana, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>IRHAH113183, Commission, Prior Approval Policy, Approval Policy Statement, Provision, Merger, Reopening, Setting Aside, Prior Notification, Federal Trade Commission, Petition, Narrow Prior, Honickman, Modify, Act, Matter, Anticompetitive Merger, Presumption, Acquisition, Hereby, Azcuenaga, Harold, Docket, Pursuant, Consistent, Prior Notice Provisions, Requests, Terminate, Hsr, Reviewing, Credible Risk , ContentID: 120247799

Case Documents
1 1997-11-05 ORDER SETTING ASIDE ORDER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 118842
3 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 3 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . ORDER SETTING ASIDE ORDER

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PRIOR APPROVAL POLICY
APPROVAL POLICY STATEMENT
PROVISION
MERGER
REOPENING
SETTING ASIDE
PRIOR NOTIFICATION
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
PETITION
NARROW PRIOR
HONICKMAN
MODIFY
ACT
MATTER
ANTICOMPETITIVE MERGER
PRESUMPTION
ACQUISITION
HEREBY
AZCUENAGA
HAROLD
DOCKET
PURSUANT
CONSISTENT
PRIOR NOTICE PROVISIONS
REQUESTS
TERMINATE
HSR
REVIEWING
CREDIBLE RISK
                          UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                      BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

   Commissioners:
          Robert Pitofsky, Chairman
          Mary L. Azcuenaga
          Sheila F. Anthony
          Mozelle W. Thompson
          Orson Swindle

                             In the Matter of

                        HAROLD A. HONICKMAN, et al.

                              DOCKET NO. 9233

                         ORDER SETTING ASIDE ORDER

   On November 5, 1997, Harold A. Honickman ("Honickman") filed a
   Petition To Modify Consent Order ("Petition") in Docket

   No. 9233 ("Order") pursuant to Section 5(b) of the Federal Trade
   Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(b), and Section 2.51 of the
   Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 16 C.F.R. § 2.51, and
   consistent with the Statement of Federal Trade Commission Policy
   Concerning Prior Approval And Prior Notice Provisions ("Prior Approval
   Policy Statement"). The Petition requests that the Commission reopen
   and modify the Order to terminate the prior approval provision set
   forth in Paragraph II of the Order. The Petition was placed on the
   public record for thirty days and no comments were received. The
   Commission has determined to terminate the prior approval provision of
   the Order by setting aside the Order.

   The Commission, in its Prior Approval Policy Statement, "concluded
   that a general policy of requiring prior approval is no longer
   needed," citing the availability of the premerger notification and
   waiting period requirements of Section 7A of the Clayton Act, commonly
   referred to as the Hart-Scott-Rodino ("HSR") Act, 15 U.S.C. § 18a, to
   protect the public interest in effective merger law enforcement. The
   Commission announced that it will "henceforth rely on the HSR process
   as its principal means of learning about and reviewing mergers by
   companies as to which the Commission had previously found a reason to
   believe that the companies had engaged or attempted to engage in an
   illegal merger." As a general matter, "Commission orders in such cases
   will not include prior approval or prior notification requirements."

   The Commission stated that it will continue to fashion remedies as
   needed in the public interest, including ordering narrow prior
SNIPPETS:
  • BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
  • HAROLD A. HONICKMAN, et al.
  • On November 5, 1997, Harold A. Honickman filed a Petition To Modify Consent Order in Docket
  • No. 9233 pursuant to Section 5of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45, and
  • The Petition requests that the Commission reopen and modify the Order to terminate the prior
  • The Commission has determined to terminate the prior approval provision of the Order by
  • The Commission, in its Prior Approval Policy Statement, "concluded that a general policy of
  • The Commission announced that it will "henceforth rely on the HSR process as its principal
  • The Commission stated that it will continue to fashion remedies as needed in the public
  • The Commission said in its Prior Approval Policy Statement that "a narrow prior approval
  • "when a petition is filed to reopen and modify an order pursuant to.
  • the Commission will apply a rebuttable presumption that the public interest requires
  • There is no evidence in the record that suggests that this matter presents any of the
  • There is nothing to suggest that Honickman would attempt the same or essentially the same
  • it appears likely that future acquisitions that may have adverse competitive consequences
  • Nothing to overcome the presumption having been presented, the Commission has determined to
  • ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that this matter be, and it hereby is, reopened, and that the
  • By the Commission, Commissioner Azcuenaga recused.
  •    |