LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

IN RE ESRIM VE SHEVA HOLDING CORP Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: IREVSHC161419, CourtCode: FED, CourtName: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, State: CA California, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>IREVSHC161419, Respondents, Complaint, Commission, Federal Trade Commission, Representation, Fuel, Acts, Officer, Sheva Holding, Alexander Elnekaveh, Agreement, Practices, Super Fuelmax, Consumer, Esrim, Evidence, Sale, Proposed Respondents, Consent Order, Affecting Commerce, Manner, Directs, Reliable Scientific Evidence, Proposed Consent Order, Advertising, Successors, Representations, Employment, Promotion, Terminate, Alleges, Paragraph, Respondent Esrim, Violation, Draft Complaint, Acceptance, Harmful , ContentID: 120247758

Case Documents
1   EXHIBITS A-C
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 131062
3 pages
PDF
2   DECISION & ORDER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 123577
6 pages
PDF
3   COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 118668
4 pages
HTML
4   ANALYSIS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 118667
2 pages
HTML
5   AGREEMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 118666
7 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 5 documents , 22 pages
Price: $ 39.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . EXHIBITS A-C

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SUPER
EXHIBIT
SUPER FUELMAX
COSTS
VIE VERKIGN
GADGET UNIVERSE
COWRISHT
FAVORITES
E2ZILFAP
SUBSCFIBETOGEDGETA
CART
ITARNS
HAGA
EMI
INSTOCK
MONEY
REFUND
MIDDLE EAST TOMORROK
PRICES
RAKE
WORRYING
TOLEDUCE
AMUND DRE
TRANSPORTATION
TRUCKING FLEETS
TTIE SUPER FUELMAX
HARMFUL POLLUTANTS
REDUCTION
LNCNSSED MILEAGE
EXHIBIT     A




EXHIBIT     B


                                                                                                   

                                                                                                   
      9408  Owensmouth        Ave.                                                                 
      Cliatsworth,CA       9131  I
                                                                                                   





I                                              To  order  call  l-800-478-4703       24  hours.
         `For  Customer                Service  and  Product  Information     call  1-800-872-8280 


               0





EXHIBIT  C


.  :...'  .:  ~adget&$-                 1;800  4784703               .                  '          
                                               .Pw     1 of  I
                                                                                                   





                                              I-Hnme        I  Srib&ihe  I  About  GU. .I  Sirpport



                                         .
                                                                                                   
                                   A&AV&ble:
                                                                                                   
         $49.95
SNIPPETS:
  • EXHIBIT B
  • Super Fuel Max
  • Your Fuel Costs.
  • 42% reduction
  • In harmful pollutants.
  • Since ttie Super fuelMAX
  • Is used by trucking fleets and transportation dep?Wents
  • amund dre world, it`s exactly w&t I need toleduce my fuel.
  • costs today without worrying about how highlhey'li rake OK
  • prices.
  • in the Middle East tomorrok Try it kc 60 C!ayS+ It.
  • doesn't work for you, we'll refund your money.
  • Instock?
  • EmI ra"""l=
  • You haGa no itarns
  • `in your cart
  • subscfibetoGedgetA
  • E2ZIlfap
  • to your Favorites
  • Gadget Universe

  • 2 . DECISION & ORDER

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    COMMISSION
    COMPLAINT
    FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
    REPRESENTATION
    CONSUMER
    SALE
    RESPONDENT ESRIM
    SHEVA HOLDING
    ALEXANDER ELNEKAVEH
    OFFICER
    ACTS
    BUSINESS
    DIRECTS
    PRACTICES
    VIOLATION
    EVIDENCE
    MANNER
    SUCCESSORS
    AFFECTING COMMERCE
    MATTER
    CONSUMER PROTECTION
    AGREEMENT
    JURISDICTION
    RELIABLE SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE
    EMPLOYMENT
    ADVERTISING
    PROMOTION
    TERMINATE
    APPEALING
    
                                                                                    012 3116
                                          UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                                BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
    
    
    COMMISSIONERS:
    
                    Timothy J. Muris, Chairman
                    Sheila F. Anthony
                    Mozelle W. Thompson
                    Orson Swindle
                    Thomas B. Leary
    
    
    
    
     In the Matter of
    
     ESRIM VE SHEVA HOLDING
     CORPORATION,
       a corporation, sometimes doing business as             DOCKET NO. C-4030
        GADGET UNIVERSE, and
    
     ALEXANDER ELNEKAVEH,
        individually and as an officer
        of the corporation.
    
    
    
    
    
                                            DECISION AND ORDER
    
       The Federal Trade Commission having initiated an investigation of certain acts and practices of
    respondents named in the caption hereof, and the respondents having been furnished thereafter with a
    copy of a draft complaint which the Bureau of Consumer Protection proposed to present to the
    Commission for its consideration and which, if issued by the Commission, would charge respondents
    with violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act; and
    
    
    
                                                      Page 1 of  6
    
    
    
       The respondents, their attorneys, and counsel for the Commission having thereafter executed an
    agreement containing a consent order, an admission by the respondents of all the jurisdictional
    forth in the draft complaint, a statement that the signing of said agreement is for settlement
    only and does not constitute an admission by respondents that the law has been violated as alleged
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
  • The Federal Trade Commission having initiated an investigation of certain acts and practices
  • The Commission having considered the matter and having determined that it had reason to ing jurisdictional findings and enters the following order:
  • Respondent Esrim Ve Sheva Holding Corp. is a New York corporation with its principal office
  • Respondent Alexander Elnekaveh is an officer of the corporate respondent.
  • Individually or in concert with others he formulates, directs, or controls the policies,
  • The Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this proceeding and of
  • "Competent and reliable scientific evidence" shall mean tests, analyses, research, studies,
  • IT IS ORDERED that respondents, directly or through any corporation, subsidiary, division, or
  • unless, at the time of making such representation, respondents possess and rely upon
  • IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents, directly or through any corporation, subsidiary,
  • IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent Esrim Ve Sheva Holding Corp., and its successors and
  • including complaints and other communications with consumers or with governmental or consumer
  • IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent Alexander Elnekaveh, for a period of five years after
  • This order will terminate on December 17, 2021, or twenty years from the most recent date
  • Provided, further, that if such complaint is dismissed or a federal court rules that the l or ruling is upheld on appeal.

  • 3 . COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    FUEL
    SUPER FUELMAX
    REPRESENTATIONS
    PARAGRAPH
    FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
    ACTS
    HARMFUL
    ALEXANDER ELNEKAVEH
    OFFICER
    PRACTICES
    ADVERTISEMENTS
    ESRIM
    SHEVA HOLDING
    BUSINESS
    ALLEGES
    COMPLAINT
    EXHIBITS
    HARMFUL POLLUTANTS
    REPRESENTATIONS SET
    IMPLICATION
    GADGET UNIVERSE
    REASON
    PRINCIPAL OFFICE
    MAGNET
    AFFECTING COMMERCE
    FINDINGS
    FUEL COSTS
    HARMFUL EMISSIONS
    CATALOG
    
                                                                     012 3116
    
                              UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                          BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
    
                                  In the Matter of
    
         ESRIM VE SHEVA HOLDING CORPORATION, a corporation, sometimes doing
                          business as GADGET UNIVERSE, and
             ALEXANDER ELNEKAVEH, individually and as an officer of the
                                    corporation.
                                     DOCKET NO.
    
                                     COMPLAINT
    
       The Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that Esrim Ve
       Sheva Holding Corporation, sometimes doing business as Gadget
       Universe, and Alexander Elnekaveh, individually and as an officer of
       the corporation ("respondents"), have violated the provisions of the
       Federal Trade Commission Act, and it appearing to the Commission that
       this proceeding is in the public interest, alleges:
    
       1a. Respondent Esrim Ve Sheva Holding Corp. is a New York corporation
       with its principal office or place of business at 9408 Owensmouth
       Ave., Chatsworth, California 91311.
    
       1b. Respondent Alexander Elnekaveh is an officer of the corporate
       respondent. Individually or in concert with others he formulates,
       directs, or controls the policies, acts, or practices of the
       corporation, including the acts or practices alleged in this
       complaint. His principal office or place of business is the same as
       that of Esrim Ve Sheva Holding Corp.
    
       2. Respondents have advertised, offered for sale, sold, and
       distributed products to the public, including Super FuelMAX, an
       automotive aftermarket fuel-line magnet device.
    
       3. The acts and practices of respondents alleged in this complaint
       have been in or affecting commerce, as "commerce" is defined in
       Section 4 of the Federal Trade Commission Act.
    
       4. Respondents have disseminated or have caused to be disseminated
       advertisements for the Super FuelMAX, including but not necessarily
       limited to the attached Exhibits A, B, and C. These advertisements
       contain the following statements:
    
              A. Finding the world's most extraordinary products for you is
              not my job - it's my mission. . . . No matter where you see our
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
  • ESRIM VE SHEVA HOLDING CORPORATION, a corporation, sometimes doing
  • The Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that Esrim Ve Sheva Holding
  • Respondent Esrim Ve Sheva Holding Corp. is a New York corporation with its principal office
  • Individually or in concert with others he formulates, directs, or controls the policies,
  • Respondents have advertised, offered for sale, sold, and distributed products to the public,
  • The acts and practices of respondents alleged in this complaint have been in or affecting
  • Respondents have disseminated or have caused to be disseminated advertisements for the Super
  • Here's one the big oil companies don't want you to know about: Super FuelMAX on page 52 will
  • (Exhibit A (catalog ad))
  • A certified EPA laboratory reports an amazing 27% in increased mileage and 42% reduction in
  • Through the means described in Paragraph 4, respondents have represented, expressly or by
  • Elnekaveh's actual findings and experience with the product; and B. the typical or ordinary

  • 4 . ANALYSIS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    RESPONDENTS
    PROPOSED CONSENT ORDER
    REPRESENTATION
    FUEL
    COMPLAINT
    AGREEMENT
    FUEL CONSUMPTION
    EMISSIONS
    POLLUTANTS
    EVIDENCE
    FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
    ACTS
    ALLEGES
    COMPETENT
    RELIABLE SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE
    PUBLIC RECORD
    SUPER FUELMAX
    FUEL-LINE MAGNET
    HARMFUL EMISSIONS
    PRACTICES
    VIOLATION
    ADVERTISING
    FUEL MOLECULES
    FUEL BURN
    POSSESS
    FINDINGS
    ORDINARY EXPERIENCE
    MEMBERS
    PROVISIONS
    
                                                                     012 3116
    
                         Analysis of Proposed Consent Order
                               To Aid Public Comment
    
       The Federal Trade Commission has accepted, subject to final approval,
       an agreement for entry of a consent order from Esrim Ve Sheva Holding
       Corp., a corporation sometimes doing business as Gadget Universe, and
       its CEO, Alexander Elnekaveh, individually and as an officer of the
       corporation (referred to collectively as "respondents"). The agreement
       would settle a complaint by the Federal Trade Commission that
       respondents engaged in deceptive acts or practices in violation of
       Section 5(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act.
    
       The proposed consent order has been placed on the public record for
       thirty (30) days for receipt of comments by interested persons.
       Comments received during this period will become part of the public
       record. After thirty (30) days, the Commission will again review the
       agreement and the comments received and will decide whether it should
       withdraw from the agreement or make final the agreement's proposed
       order.
    
       This matter concerns advertising representations made about Super
       FuelMAX, an automotive fuel-line magnet. The administrative complaint
       alleges that respondents violated the FTC Act by disseminating
       advertisements that made unsubstantiated performance claims about
       Super FuelMAX. The Complaint alleges that respondents represented that
       Super FuelMAX: (1) causes fuel molecules to line up in straight
       columns and rows; (2) improves fuel burn through magnetic resonance;
       (3) reduces fuel consumption; (4) reduces fuel consumption by 27% or
       up to 27%; (5) reduces harmful emissions or pollutants; and (6)
       reduces harmful emissions or pollutants by 42% or up to 40%. The
       Complaint further alleges that respondents represented that they had a
       reasonable basis for making these claims, but in fact did not possess
       competent evidence supporting them. Additionally, the Complaint
       challenges, as false, claims that tests performed at a certified U.S.
       Environmental Protection Agency prove that: (a) increases mileage by
       27%; and (b) reduces harmful pollutants by 42%.
    
       The Complaint also alleges that respondents falsely represented that a
       testimonial from respondent Alexander Elnekaveh reflected: (a)
       Elnekaveh's actual findings and experience with the product; and (b)
       the typical or ordinary experience of members of the public who use
       the product.
    
       The proposed consent order contains provisions designed to prevent
       respondents from engaging in similar acts and practices in the future.
       Part I of the proposed consent order prohibits respondents from making
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Analysis of Proposed Consent Order
  • The agreement would settle a complaint by the Federal Trade Commission that respondents
  • The proposed consent order has been placed on the public record for thirty days for receipt
  • This matter concerns advertising representations made about Super FuelMAX, an automotive
  • The administrative complaint alleges that respondents violated the FTC Act by disseminating
  • The Complaint alleges that respondents represented that Super FuelMAX: causes fuel molecules
  • The Complaint further alleges that respondents represented that they had a reasonable basis
  • The Complaint also alleges that respondents falsely represented that a testimonial from
  • Part I of the proposed consent order prohibits respondents from making unsubstantiated claims y number, percentage, or rate; or about the benefits, performance, or efficacy of such product.
  • The evidence required to substantiate such claims must be competent and reliable evidence,
  • Part III of the proposed consent order prohibits respondents from representing that the ts would be for users of the product, or that consumers should not expect to experience similar
  • The remainder of the proposed consent order also contains provisions regarding

  • 5 . AGREEMENT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    COMMISSION
    COMPLAINT
    REPRESENTATION
    PROPOSED RESPONDENTS
    FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
    OFFICER
    ESRIM
    SHEVA HOLDING
    AGREEMENT
    ALEXANDER ELNEKAVEH
    BUSINESS
    SALE
    CONSUMER
    MANNER
    DRAFT COMPLAINT
    DIRECTS
    ACCEPTANCE
    ACTS
    PRACTICES
    EVIDENCE
    SUCCESSORS
    AFFECTING COMMERCE
    LAW
    NOTIFY
    RELIABLE SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE
    EMPLOYMENT
    ADVERTISING
    PROMOTION
    TERMINATE
    
                              UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                          BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
    
                                  In the Matter of
    
         ESRIM VE SHEVA HOLDING CORPORATION, a corporation, sometimes doing
                          business as GADGET UNIVERSE, and
             ALEXANDER ELNEKAVEH, individually and as an officer of the
                                    corporation.
                                 FILE NO. 012-3116
                         AGREEMENT CONTAINING CONSENT ORDER
    
       The Federal Trade Commission has conducted an investigation of certain
       acts and practices of Esrim Ve Sheva Holding Corporation, sometimes
       doing business as Gadget Universe, and Alexander Elnekaveh,
       individually and as an officer of the corporation ("proposed
       respondents"). Proposed respondents, having been represented by
       counsel, are willing to enter into an agreement containing a consent
       order resolving the allegations contained in the attached draft
       complaint. Therefore,
    
       IT IS HEREBY AGREED by and between Esrim Ve Sheva Holding Corporation,
       by its duly authorized officers, and Alexander Elnekaveh, individually
       and as an officer of the corporation, and counsel for the Federal
       Trade Commission that:
    
              1a. Proposed respondent Esrim Ve Sheva Holding Corp. is a New
              York corporation with its principal office or place of business
              at 9408 Owensmouth Ave., Chatsworth, California 91311.
              1b. Proposed respondent Alexander Elnekaveh is an officer of
              the corporate respondent. Individually or in concert with
              others he formulates, directs, or controls the policies, acts,
              or practices of the corporation, including the acts or
              practices alleged in this complaint. His principal office or
              place of business is the same as that of Esrim Ve Sheva Holding
              Corp.
              2. Proposed respondents admit all of the jurisdictional facts
              set forth in the draft complaint.
              3. Proposed respondents waive:
    
                    a. Any further procedural steps;
    
                    b. The requirement that the Commission's decision contain
                    a statement of findings of fact and conclusions of law;
                    and
    
                    c. All rights to seek judicial review or otherwise to
                    challenge or contest the validity of the order entered
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • The Federal Trade Commission has conducted an investigation of certain acts and practices of
  • Proposed respondents, having been represented by counsel, are willing to enter into an
  • Individually or in concert with others he formulates, directs, or controls the policies,
  • The Commission thereafter may either withdraw its acceptance of this agreement and so notify
  • This agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by
  • When so entered, the order shall have the same force and effect and may be altered, modified,
  • No agreement, understanding, representation, or interpretation not contained in the order or
  • "Competent and reliable scientific evidence" shall mean tests, analyses, research, studies,
  • IT IS ORDERED that respondents, directly or through any corporation, subsidiary, division, or
  • unless, at the time of making such representation, respondents possess and rely upon
  • IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents, directly or through any corporation, subsidiary,
  • IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent Esrim Ve Sheva Holding Corp., and its successors and
  • All notices required by this Part shall be sent by certified mail to the Associate Director,
  • IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent Alexander Elnekaveh, for a period of five years after
  • Provided, further, that if such complaint is dismissed or a federal court rules that the l or ruling is upheld on appeal.
  •    |