LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

IN RE EMERSON ELECTRIC CO Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: IREEC122498, CourtCode: FED, CourtName: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>IREEC122498, Commission, Prior Approval Policy, Approval Policy Statement, Merger, Emerson, Reopening, Provision, Act, Federal Trade Commission, Petition, Matter, Mounted Ball Bearings, United States, Aside, Modify, Paragraph, Prior Notification, Narrow Prior, Anticompetitive Merger, Presumption, Hereby, Respondents, Reporting Requirements, Complaint, Divest, Ball Bearings Business, Requests, Reasons, Clayton Act, Sale , ContentID: 120247755

Case Documents
1 1998-07-24 ORDER SETTING ASIDE ORDER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 118655
4 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 4 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . ORDER SETTING ASIDE ORDER

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PRIOR APPROVAL POLICY
APPROVAL POLICY STATEMENT
MERGER
EMERSON
REOPENING
PROVISION
ACT
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
PETITION
MATTER
MOUNTED BALL BEARINGS
UNITED STATES
ASIDE
MODIFY
PARAGRAPH
PRIOR NOTIFICATION
NARROW PRIOR
ANTICOMPETITIVE MERGER
PRESUMPTION
HEREBY
RESPONDENTS
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
COMPLAINT
DIVEST
BALL BEARINGS BUSINESS
REQUESTS
REASONS
CLAYTON ACT
SALE
                          UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                      BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

   COMMISSIONERS:
          Robert Pitofsky, Chairman
          Sheila F. Anthony
          Mozelle W. Thompson
          Orson Swindle

                              In the Matter of

                  EMERSON ELECTRIC CO., a corporation, and
              EMERSON POWER TRANSMISSION CORP., a corporation.

                             Docket No. C-3291

                         ORDER SETTING ASIDE ORDER

   On July 24, 1998, Emerson Electric Co. and its wholly-owned subsidiary
   Emerson Power Transmission Corp. (collectively "Emerson"), the
   respondents named in the above-referenced consent order ("Order")
   issued by the Commission on June 22, 1990, filed its Petition to
   Reopen and Modify Consent Order ("Petition") in this matter. Emerson
   asks that the Commission reopen and modify the Order pursuant to
   Section 5(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(b),
   and Section 2.51 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure,
   16 C.F.R. § 2.51, and consistent with the Statement of Federal Trade
   Commission Concerning Prior Approval and Prior Notice Provisions,
   issued on June 21, 1995 ("Prior Approval Policy Statement").(1) The
   Petition requests that the Commission reopen and modify the Order to
   eliminate the prior approval provision and related reporting
   requirements set forth in Paragraph IX of the Order. The thirty-day
   public comment period on the Petition ended on September 24, 1998. No
   comments were received. For the reasons discussed below, the
   Commission has determined to grant Emerson's Petition.

   The Complaint in this matter alleges that Emerson's agreement with
   McGill Manufacturing Co., Inc. ("McGill") to acquire substantially all
   of McGill's voting securities violated Section 5 of the Federal Trade
   Commission Act ("FTC Act"), 15 U.S.C. § 45, and Section 7 of the
   Clayton Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 18, by lessening competition and
   tending to create a monopoly in the production and distribution of
   mounted ball bearings in the United States.

   The Order required Emerson to divest McGill's Mounted Ball Bearings
   Business, as defined in Paragraph I.F. of the Order. On June 14, 1991,
   the Commission approved Emerson's application to divest McGill's
   Mounted Ball Bearings Business to VMB, Inc., an affiliate of The
SNIPPETS:
  • BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
  • EMERSON POWER TRANSMISSION CORP., a corporation.
  • On July 24, 1998, Emerson Electric Co. and its wholly-owned subsidiary Emerson Power
  • Emerson asks that the Commission reopen and modify the Order pursuant to Section 5of the ting requirements set forth in Paragraph IX of the Order.
  • For the reasons discussed below, the Commission has determined to grant Emerson's Petition.
  • The Complaint in this matter alleges that Emerson's agreement with McGill Manufacturing Co.,
  • The Order required Emerson to divest McGill's Mounted Ball Bearings Business, as defined in
  • On June 14, 1991, the Commission approved Emerson's application to divest McGill's Mounted
  • Under the Order, Emerson is prohibited for a ten-year period from acquiring, without the
  • The Commission, in its Prior Approval Policy Statement, "concluded that a general policy of learning about and reviewing mergers by companies as to which the Commission had previously found
  • The Commission stated that it will continue to fashion remedies as needed in the public
  • The Commission said in its Prior Approval Policy Statement that "a narrow prior approval
  • The Commission also announced, in its Prior Approval Policy Statement, its intention "to
  • the Commission will apply a rebuttable presumption that the public interest requires
  • The presumption is that setting aside the general prior approval requirement of Paragraph IX
  • There is nothing to suggest that the respondent would attempt the same or essentially the
  • Nothing to overcome the presumption having been presented, and because the only remaining
  • Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter be, and it hereby is, reopened, and that
  •    |