LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

FTC v PRECISION COMMUNICATIONS ADMINISTRATION INC Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: FVPCAI259772, CourtCode: FED, CourtName: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff: FTC, State: FL Florida, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>FVPCAI259772, Business Venture, Act, Purchasers, Pay-per-call, Advertising, Ftc Act, Trade Commission, District, Relief, Consumers, Federal Trade Commission, Violations, Florida, Precision, Practices, United States, John, Injunction, Middle District, Complaint, Deceptive Acts, Sale, Revenue, Jurisdiction, Affecting Commerce, Representations, Sending Business Venture , ContentID: 120247548

Case Documents
1   COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 117969
9 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 9 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
BUSINESS VENTURE
ACT
PURCHASERS
PAY-PER-CALL
ADVERTISING
FTC ACT
COURT
TRADE COMMISSION
DISTRICT
RELIEF
CONSUMERS
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
VIOLATIONS
FLORIDA
PLAINTIFF
PRECISION
PRACTICES
UNITED STATES
JOHN
INJUNCTION
MIDDLE DISTRICT
COMPLAINT
DECEPTIVE ACTS
SALE
REVENUE
JURISDICTION
AFFECTING COMMERCE
REPRESENTATIONS
SENDING BUSINESS VENTURE
                      IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                      IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                      FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
                      FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA





                                                     ))
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,                            ))))
               Plaintiff,
               Plaintiff,                            ))      Docket No.
                                                             Docket No.
                                                     ))
                        v.
                        v.                           ))))
PRECISION COMMUNICATIONS
PRECISION COMMUNICATIONS                             ))
ADMINISTRATION, INC.,
ADMINISTRATION, INC.,                                ))
       A Florida corporation; and
       A Florida corporation; and              ))
                                                     ))
JEFFREY BLAYZ, a/k/a John Blammy,
JEFFREY BLAYZ, a/k/a John Blammy,                    ))
       John Jeff Sutton, Jeff Gagliano,
       John Jeff Sutton, Jeff Gagliano,              ))
       and John Colburn,  individually, and
       and John Colburn,  individually, and          ))
       as an officer and director of
       as an officer and director of           ))
       PRECISION COMMUNICATIONS
       PRECISION COMMUNICATIONS                      ))
       ADMINISTRATION, INC.,
       ADMINISTRATION, INC.,                         ))))
               Defendants.
               Defendants.                           ))))

      PLAINTIFF FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
      PLAINTIFF FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION S COMPLAINT FOR
                                                             S COMPLAINT FOR
        PERMANENT INJUNCTION
        PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND OTHER EQUITABLE
                                            AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF
                                                                           RELIEF


SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
  • FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
  • PRECISION COMMUNICATIONS
  • JEFFREY BLAYZ, a/k/a John Blammy,
  • PLAINTIFF FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
  • PLAINTIFF FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION S COMPLAINT FOR
  • PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND OTHER EQUITABLE
  • Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. 53, to obtain preliminary and
  • permanent injunctive relief, rescission of contracts, restitution, disgorgement, and other
  • equitable relief to redress consumers for the injury resulting from defendants deceptive
  • acts or practices in violation of Section 5of the FTC Act,
  • JURISDICTION AND VENUE
  • which prohibits unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce.
  • consumers, and additionally sells advertising for those and other pay-per-call services.
  • substantial course of trade in the offering for sale and sale of business enterprises,
  • business venture includes advertising packages for pay-per-call telephone lines,
  • the defendants have made numerous representations to prospective purchasers concerning
  • Revenue generated by pay-per-call lines
  • business venture purchasers to spend what they can on advertising,
  • VIOLATIONS OF SECTION 5 OF THE FTC ACT
  • Sending business venture purchasers weekly call count reports,
  •    |