 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
TEMP RESTRAINING ORDER
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
MANAGEMENT DEFENDANTS ASSETS COMMISSION TEMPORARY RECEIVER COURT BUSINESS ACCOUNTS GRANT RECEIVERSHIP DEFENDANTS IMMEDIATE ACCESS BUSINESS PREMISES PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION CONSUMERS UNITED STATES FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ANTHONY CONSALVO EXPEDITED DISCOVERY AUTHORITY NATIONAL GRANT FOUNDATION GRANT RESEARCH PUBLISHING TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER ASSET FREEZE APPOINTMENT POSSESSION EMPLOYEES PARAGRAPH FTC COMPLAINT |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
Plaintiff
v.
NATIONAL GRANT FOUNDATION, INC., GRANT RESEARCH & PUBLISHING, INC.,
WALLACE MILLMAN,
ANTHONY CONSALVO,
DENNIS J. COLONNA,
ANTHONY LUCCA,
HARRIET KAYE,
BEVERLY JANSEN,
and CAROL CLOUGH,
Defendants.
Case No.
Magistrate Judge
(Proposed)
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER WITH ASSET FREEZE, EXPEDITED DISCOVERY,
IMMEDIATE ACCESS TO DEFENDANT'S BUSINESS PREMISES, APPOINTMENT OF A
TEMPORARY RECEIVER, AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF, AND ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE WHY A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SHOULD NOT ISSUE
Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission ("FTC" or "Commission"), having
filed its complaint in this matter seeking injunctive and other
relief, including redress to consumers, and having moved for (1) a
temporary restraining order; (2) an order freezing the accounts,
wherever located, belonging to defendants National Grant Foundation,
Inc. ("NGF") and Grant Research & Publishing, Inc. ("GRP")
(collectively referred to as the "corporate defendants"), and
defendants Wallace Millman, Anthony Consalvo, Dennis Colonna, and
Anthony Lucca (collectively referred to as the "management
defendants") or for which any management defendant has signature
authority; (3) an order requiring an immediate accounting of the
corporate and management defendants' assets and transfers of assets;
(4) an order permitting expedited discovery as to the corporate and
management defendants' assets; (5) immediate access to defendants'
business premises; and (6) an order to show cause why a preliminary
injunction should not issue pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b); and the
SNIPPETS:
|
|
2
.
COMPLAINT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
NGF ACTS SCHOLARSHIP PRACTICES CONSUMERS GRP TRANSACTS FLORIDA GRANT FTC ACT TRANSACTED BUSINESS STUDENTS SOUTHERN DISTRICT COLLEGE VIOLATIONS RELIEF COURT UNITED STATES FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION EQUITABLE RELIEF DIRECTS TELEMARKETING ATTORNEYS BANK ACCOUNTS CONCERT PROVIDED TELEMARKETING SERVICES CONTROLS FORMULATES NGF REPRESENTATIVES |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
Plaintiff
v.
NATIONAL GRANT FOUNDATION, INC., GRANT RESEARCH & PUBLISHING, INC.,
WALLACE MILLMAN,
ANTHONY CONSALVO,
DENNIS J. COLONNA,
ANTHONY LUCCA,
HARRIET KAYE,
BEVERLY JANSEN,
and CAROL CLOUGH,
Defendants.
Case No.
Magistrate Judge
COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTION
AND OTHER EQUITABLE
RELIEF
Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission ("Commission"), by its
undersigned attorneys, alleges as follows:
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1. This is an action under Section 13(b) of the Federal Trade
Commission Act ("FTC Act"), 15 U.S.C. § 53(b), to secure
injunctive and other equitable relief, including rescission,
restitution, and disgorgement, against defendants for
violations of Section 5(a) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(a),
which prohibits deceptive acts or practices in or affecting
commerce.
2. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over plaintiff's
claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1337(a), and 1345, and 15
U.S.C. §§ 45(a) and 53(b).
3. Venue in this district is proper under 28 U.S.C.§ 1391(b)
and (c), and 15 U.S.C. § 53(b).
SNIPPETS:
|
|
3
.
STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
CONSALVO COMMISSION CONSUMERS COMPLAINT RELIEF GRANTS PERMANENT COURT JUDGEMENT ACT REDRESS BUSINESS DEFENDANT ANTHONY CONSALVO FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION SOUTHERN DISTRICT FTC TELEMARKETING SCHOLARSHIP SERVICES UNITED STATES EQUITABLE RELIEF ASSET FREEZE EMPLOYEES STIPULATE PERMANENT INJUNCTION MISREPRESENTING ATTORNEYS PARTICIPATION PARTE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
Plaintiff
v.
NATIONAL GRANT FOUNDATION, INC., GRANT RESEARCH & PUBLISHING, INC.,
WALLACE MILLMAN, ANTHONY CONSALVO, DENNIS J. COLONNA, ANTHONY LUCCA,
HARRIET KAYE, BEVERLY JANSEN, and CAROL CLOUGH,
Defendants.
Case No. 97-7339-civ-LENARD
Magistrate Judge GARBER
STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND OTHER
EQUITABLE RELIEF AGAINST DEFENDANT ANTHONY CONSALVO
On November 3, 1997, Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission
("Commission"), pursuant to Section 13(b) of the Federal Trade
Commission Act ("FTC Act"), 15 U.S.C. § 53(b), filed a complaint in
this matter seeking injunctive and other relief, including redress to
consumers, and moved ex parte for a temporary restraining order with
asset freeze and other relief. That same day, the Court granted the
Commission's motion and issued an ex parte temporary restraining order
against the defendants. The Court entered a Preliminary Injunction
With Asset Freeze, Appointment of a Permanent Receiver, and Other
Equitable Relief on November 12, 1997.
The Commission and defendant Anthony Consalvo ("defendant Consalvo")
have stipulated to the entry of the following Final Judgment and Order
in settlement of the Commission's complaint against him, and the
Court, being advised in this premises, finds:
1. This is an action by the Commission instituted under Sections 5
and 13(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 45 and
53(b) ("FTC Act"). The complaint seeks permanent injunctive relief
and redress for injured consumers for alleged unfair or deceptive
acts or practices by defendant Consalvo in the promotion and sale
of services related to identifying potential scholarships or
grants for high school and college students or their families
(hereinafter referred to as "scholarship services").
2. This Court has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this case and
jurisdiction over all parties hereto. Venue in the Southern
SNIPPETS:
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
