LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

FTC v MODERN CREDIT FINANCIAL SERVICES INC Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: FVMCFSI206912, CourtCode: FED, CourtName: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff: FTC, State: TX Texas, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>FVMCFSI206912, Commission, Credit Financial Services, Sales, Matthew, Hammack, Robert Hansel, Federal Trade Commission, Officer, Complaint, Ftc Act, United States, Telemarketing Sales Rule, District Court, Pursuant, Permanent Injunction, Northern District, Civil Action, Stipulate, Violation, Paragraph, Credit Cards, Employees, Materials, Provision, Extensions, Compliance , ContentID: 120247518

Case Documents
1 2000-05 STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 117907
17 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 17 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COMMISSION
CREDIT FINANCIAL SERVICES
SALES
MATTHEW
HAMMACK
ROBERT HANSEL
COURT
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
OFFICER
COMPLAINT
FTC ACT
UNITED STATES
TELEMARKETING SALES RULE
DISTRICT COURT
PURSUANT
PERMANENT INJUNCTION
NORTHERN DISTRICT
CIVIL ACTION
STIPULATE
VIOLATION
PARAGRAPH
PLAINTIFF
CREDIT CARDS
EMPLOYEES
MATERIALS
PROVISION
EXTENSIONS
ATTORNEYS
COMPLIANCE
                        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                         NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
                              DALLAS DIVISION

                    FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff,

                                     v.

           MODERN CREDIT FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., a corporation,
   MATTHEW A. HAMMACK, individually and as an officer and director of the
                              corporation, and
     ROBERT HANSEL, individually and as an officer and director of the
                          corporation, Defendants.
                       Civil Action No. 3-99CV1756-G

      STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND
                              MONETARY RELIEF

   Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC" or "Commission"),
   commenced this action by filing a Complaint pursuant to Sections 13(b)
   and 19 of the Federal Trade Commission Act ("FTC Act"), 15 U.S.C.
   §§ 53(b) and 57b, charging the defendants with engaging in unfair or
   deceptive acts or practices in violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act,
   15 U.S.C. § 45, and the FTC's Telemarketing Sales Rule, 16 C.F.R. Part
   310.

   Now the Commission and defendants agree to a settlement of this action
   without trial or adjudication of any issue of law or fact herein and
   without the defendants admitting liability for any of the violations
   alleged in the complaint or for any wrongdoing whatsoever. The
   Commission and defendants consent to entry of this Final Order without
   trial or adjudication of any issue of law or fact herein.

   Upon the consent of the parties hereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED,
   ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as follows:

                                  FINDINGS

          1. This is an action by the Commission instituted under
          Sections 5, 13(b), and 19 of the Federal Trade Commission Act,
          15 U.S.C. §§ 45, 53(b), and 57b, and the Telemarketing Sales
          Rule, 16 C.F.R. Part 310. The Complaint seeks both permanent
          injunctive relief and consumer redress for alleged deceptive
          acts or practices by the defendants in connection with the
          promotion, offering for sale and sale of services relating to
          credit cards, loans, or other extensions of credit. The
          Complaint states a claim upon which relief may be granted
          against defendants under Sections 5, 13(b), and 19 of the FTC
SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
  • FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff,
  • MODERN CREDIT FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., a corporation, MATTHEW A. HAMMACK, individually and
  • ROBERT HANSEL, individually and as an officer and director of the
  • corporation, Defendants.
  • Civil Action No. 3-99CV1756-G
  • Now the Commission and defendants agree to a settlement of this action without trial or
  • This is an action by the Commission instituted under Sections 5, 13, and 19 of the Federal
  • The Complaint seeks both permanent injunctive relief and consumer redress for alleged
  • The Complaint states a claim upon which relief may be granted against defendants under
  • This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this case and has jurisdiction over
  • Venue in the Northern District of Texas is proper.
  • Defendants shall bear their own costs and attorneys fees.
  • For purposes of this Final Judgment and Order for Permanent Injunction and Monetary Relief,
  • "Assisting others" means knowingly providing any of the following goods or services to
  • IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, in connection with the advertising, promotion, offering for service or otherwise, whether acting directly or through any corporation, subsidiary, division, or
  • The Bond shall cite this Order as the subject matter of the Bond, and shall provide surety
  • The Bond required pursuant to this Paragraph shall be an insurance agreement providing surety
  • If the Court finds that any defendantfailed to disclose any material asset, materially mounts previously paid.
  • E. Copies of all sales scripts, training materials, advertisements, or other marketing
  • COMPLIANCE REPORTING BY DEFENDANTS
  •    |