LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

FTC v MICHAEL F ELTMAN Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: FVMFE102361, CourtCode: FED, CourtName: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff: FTC, State: WA Washington, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>FVMFE102361, Credit, Act, Credit Repair, Consumers, Credit Repair Organizations, Relief, Ftc Act, Credit Repair Products, Commission, Social Security, Violations, Sale, Federal Trade Commission, Injunction, Practices, District, Equitable Relief, United States, Washington, Offering, Affecting Commerce, Advertising, Credit Ratings, History, Purpose, Concealing Adverse , ContentID: 120247507

Case Documents
1   COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 117894
5 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 5 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
ACT
CREDIT REPAIR
CONSUMERS
CREDIT REPAIR ORGANIZATIONS
RELIEF
FTC ACT
CREDIT REPAIR PRODUCTS
COMMISSION
DEFENDANT
SOCIAL SECURITY
VIOLATIONS
COURT
SALE
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
PLAINTIFF
INJUNCTION
PRACTICES
DISTRICT
EQUITABLE RELIEF
UNITED STATES
WASHINGTON
OFFERING
AFFECTING COMMERCE
BUSINESS
ADVERTISING
CREDIT RATINGS
HISTORY
PURPOSE
CONCEALING ADVERSE
                        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                   FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
                                AT SEATTLE

                    FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION Plaintiff,

                                     v.

        MICHAEL F. ELTMAN, individually and d/b/a P.M. ENTERPRISES,
                                Defendants.

                              Civil Action No.

            COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF

   Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC" or "Commission") for
   its Complaint alleges:

   1. The Commission brings this action under Sections 13(b) and 19 of
   the Federal Trade Commission Act ("FTC Act"), 15 U.S.C. §§ 53(b) and
   57b, and Section 410(b) of the Credit Repair Organizations Act, 15
   U.S.C. § 1679h(b), to obtain preliminary and permanent injunctive
   relief, restitution, rescission, disgorgement and other equitable
   relief for defendant's deceptive acts or practices in connection with
   the sale and offering for sale of credit repair products in violation
   of Section 5(a) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(a), and Section
   404(a)(2) of the Credit Repair Organizations Act, 15 U.S.C.
   1679b(a)(2).

                           JURISDICTION AND VENUE

   2. This Court has jurisdiction of this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
   1331, 1337(a), and 1345, and 15 U.S.C. § 53(b).

   3. Venue in the Western District of Washington is proper under
   28 U.S.C. § 1391 and 15 U.S.C. § 53(b).

                                THE PARTIES

   4. Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission, is an independent agency
   of the United States Government created by statute. 15 U.S.C. §§ 41 et
   seq. The Commission is charged, inter alia, with enforcement of
   Section 5(a) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(a), which prohibits unfair
   or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce. The
   Commission also enforces the Credit Repair Organizations Act. 15
   U.S.C. § 1679h(a). The Commission is authorized to initiate federal
   district court proceedings, by its own attorneys, to enjoin violations
   of the FTC Act and the Credit Repair Organizations Act in order to
SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
  • FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
  • FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION Plaintiff,
  • COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF
  • the Federal Trade Commission for its Complaint alleges:
  • The Commission brings this action under Sections 13and 19 of the Federal Trade Commission Section 404of the Credit Repair Organizations Act, 15 U.S.C.
  • Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission, is an independent agency of the United States
  • The Commission is charged, inter alia, with enforcement of Section 5of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C.
  • The Commission is authorized to initiate federal district court proceedings, by its own
  • Defendant Michael F. Eltman does business as P.M. Enterprises with his office and principal
  • At all times relevant to this complaint, defendant has maintained a substantial course of
  • Defendant has advertised, promoted, offered for sale, and sold credit repair products to
  • Defendant has claimed that by using his credit repair products consumers can improve their
  • Section 404of the Credit Repair Organizations Act prohibits all persons from making any t to the consumer or to whom the consumer has applied or is applying for an extension of credit.
  • Sections 13and 19 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 53and 57b, and Section 410of the Credit Repair remedial measures.
  •    |