 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER - DEF ORTH
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COMMISSION COMPLAINT COURT RECEIVER FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION JUDGEMENT METROPOLITAN COMMUNICATIONS ACT PURSUANT ASSET MONETARY RELIEF REDRESS CONSUMERS SALE PERMANENT INVESTMENT DEFENDANT JOAN ORTH FALSELY REPRESENTING UNITED STATES DISTRICT PRACTICES TELEMARKETING SMR LICENSE INVESTMENT OFFERING IMPLICATION PERMANENT INJUNCTION ASSET FREEZE STEPHENS SINCLAIR MATERIALS |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
Plaintiff
vs.
METROPOLITAN COMMUNICATIONS CORP., et al.,
Defendants
94 Civ. 0142 (JSR)
FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION
AND FOR SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS FOR MONETARY RELIEF
AS TO DEFENDANT JOAN ORTH
Plaintiff, Federal Trade Commission ("Commission") commenced this
action by filing its Complaint against Joan Orth and others on January
11, 1994, alleging that they engaged in unfair or deceptive acts and
practices in violation of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission
Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45 (the "Act"), and seeking a permanent injunction
and redress for injured consumers, pursuant to Section 13(b) of the
Act, 15 U.S.C.§ 53(b).
On January 14, 1994 the Court entered an ex parte Temporary
Restraining Order and asset freeze against all defendants and
appointed a Temporary Receiver for the corporate defendants,
Metropolitan Communications Corp., Columbia Communications Service
Corp., Nationwide Digital Data Corp., and Stephens Sinclair, Ltd.
(collectively, "the Receivership Companies"). On January 31, 1994 this
Court entered a Stipulated Order for Preliminary Injunction With Asset
Freeze as to defendant Orth ("the Stipulated Order"), and appointed
Daniel R. Goodman, Esq., Permanent Receiver ("the Receiver") for the
Receivership Companies.
Joan Orth, the Commission and the Receiver have stipulated to the
entry of the following Final Judgment and Order in settlement of the
Commission's Complaint against Orth. Being advised in the premises,
the Court enters the following Order.
FINDINGS
1. This is an action by the Commission instituted under Sections 5
and 13(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 45 and
SNIPPETS:
|
|
2
.
COMPLAINT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
ACTS FTC METROPOLITAN COLUMBIA NATIONWIDE SMR LICENSE YORK DISTRICT COMMUNICATIONS FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION SINCLAIR ORTH FLAHERTY VIOLATIONS EQUITABLE RELIEF TRANSACTED BUSINESS MORGENSTERN INVESTMENTS PARTNERSHIP DEFENDANTS PRACTICES ACTING GENERAL COUNSEL MOBILE TELEPHONE STEPHEN GURWITZ PLAINTIFF CONSUMERS TRANSACTS MMG JURISDICTION DISGORGEMENT |
JAY SHAFFER
Acting General Counsel
STEPHEN GURWITZ (SG 7874)
MONICA E. TAIT (MT 7678)
Federal Trade Commission
Pennsylvania Ave. and Sixth St., N.W.
Room 200
Washington, D.C. 20580
(202) 326-3272 or -3505
ROBIN EICHEN
Federal Trade Commission
150 William Street, Suite 1300
New York, NY 10038
(212) 264-1207
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
Plaintiff
vs.
METROPOLITAN COMMUNICATIONS CORP., COLUMBIA COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES
CORP., NATIONWIDE DIGITAL DATA CORP., STEPHENS SINCLAIR, LTD., MEEHAN
MARKETING GROUP, INC., DONALD JACKLER, JOAN ORTH, MICHAEL FLAHERTY,
SHELDON WEAVER, DAVID WESTON, AND GLENN MORGENSTERN,
Defendants
Civ.
COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTION AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF
Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission ("Commission"), by its
undersigned attorneys, alleges as follows:
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1. This is an action under Section 13(b) of the Federal Trade
Commission Act ("FTC Act"), 15 U.S.C. § 53(b), to secure a permanent
injunction and other equitable relief, including rescission,
restitution and disgorgement, against defendants for violations of
Section 5 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(a), which prohibits unfair or
deceptive acts or practices. This Court has subject matter
SNIPPETS:
|
|
3
.
FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER - DEF WEAVER
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COMMISSION COMPLAINT COURT FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION RECEIVER METROPOLITAN COMMUNICATIONS JUDGEMENT ACT DEFENDANT MONETARY RELIEF REDRESS CONSUMERS SALE PURSUANT ASSET PERMANENT INJUNCTION SHELDON WEAVER INVESTMENT FALSELY REPRESENTING UNITED STATES DISTRICT PRACTICES TELEMARKETING SMR LICENSE IMPLICATION PLAINTIFF MATERIALS INVESTMENT OFFERING TELEMARKETED PRODUCT NATIONWIDE DIGITAL DATA |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff
vs.
METROPOLITAN COMMUNICATIONS CORP., et al., Defendants
94 Civ. 0142 (JSR)
FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION
AND FOR SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS FOR MONETARY RELIEF
AS TO DEFENDANT SHELDON WEAVER
Plaintiff, Federal Trade Commission ("Commission") commenced this
action by filing its Complaint against Sheldon Weaver and others on
January 11, 1994, alleging that they engaged in unfair or deceptive
acts and practices in violation of Section 5 of the Federal Trade
Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45 (the "Act"), and seeking a permanent
injunction and redress for injured consumers, pursuant to Section
13(b) of the Act, 15 U.S.C.§ 53(b).
On January 14, 1994 the Court entered an ex parte Temporary
Restraining Order and asset freeze against all defendants and
appointed a Temporary Receiver for the corporate defendants,
Metropolitan Communications Corp., Columbia Communications Service
Corp., Nationwide Digital Data Corp., and Stephens Sinclair, Ltd.
(collectively, "the Receivership Companies"). On January 31, 1994 this
Court entered a Stipulated Order for Preliminary Injunction With Asset
Freeze as to defendant Weaver ("the Stipulated Order"), and appointed
Daniel R. Goodman, Esq., Permanent Receiver ("the Receiver") for the
Receivership Companies.
Sheldon Weaver and the Commission have stipulated to the entry of the
following Final Judgment and Order in settlement of the Commission's
Complaint against Weaver. Being advised in the premises, the Court
enters the following Order.
FINDINGS
1. This is an action by the Commission instituted under Sections 5 and
13(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 45 and 53(b).
The Complaint seeks both permanent injunctive relief and consumer
redress for alleged deceptive acts or practices by Weaver and others
in connection with the promotion and sale of application preparation
and filing services for Specialized Mobile Radio ("SMR") licenses
issued by the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") and
SNIPPETS:
|
|
4
.
FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER - DEF JACKLER
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COMMISSION COURT METROPOLITAN COMMUNICATIONS COMPLAINT FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION CONSUMER ACT BUSINESS DEFENDANTS UNITED STATES PURSUANT TELEMARKETING SALE SHELDON JACKLER STEPHENS SINCLAIR UNITED STATES DISTRICT PERMANENT MONETARY RELIEF INVESTMENT COLUMBIA COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE NATIONWIDE DIGITAL DATA RECEIVERSHIP COMPANIES SETTLEMENT FALSELY REPRESENTING PRACTICES VIOLATION INJURED CONSUMERS MATERIALS INVESTMENT OFFERING |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
Plaintiff
vs.
METROPOLITAN COMMUNICATIONS CORP., et al.,
Defendants
94 Civ. 0142 (JSR)
FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION
AND FOR SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS FOR MONETARY RELIEF AS TO DEFENDANTS
SHELDON JACKLER, METROPOLITAN COMMUNICATIONS CORP., COLUMBIA
COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE CORP., NATIONWIDE DIGITAL DATA CORP., and
STEPHENS SINCLAIR, LTD.
Plaintiff, Federal Trade Commission ("the Commission") commenced this
action by filing its Complaint against Sheldon Jackler, Metropolitan
Communications Corp., Columbia Communications Service Corp.,
Nationwide Digital Data Corp., Stephens Sinclair, Ltd., and other
defendants on January 11, 1994, alleging that they engaged in unfair
or deceptive acts and practices in violation of Section 5 of the
Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45 (the "Act"), and seeking
a permanent injunction and redress for injured consumers, pursuant to
Section 13(b) of the Act, 15 U.S.C.§ 53(b).
On January 14, 1994 the Court entered an ex parte Temporary
Restraining Order and asset freeze against all defendants and
appointed a Temporary Receiver for the corporate defendants,
Metropolitan Communications Corp., Columbia Communications Service
Corp., Nationwide Digital Data Corp., and Stephens Sinclair, Ltd.
(collectively, "the Receivership Companies"). On January 31, 1994 this
Court entered a Stipulated Order for Preliminary Injunction With Asset
Freeze as to defendant Jackler and the Receivership Companies ("the
Stipulated Order"), and appointed Daniel R. Goodman, Esq., Permanent
Receiver ("the Receiver") for the Receivership Companies.
The Receiver filed a Complaint dated February 23, 1995 in the United
States District Court for the Southern District of New York against
Sheldon Jackler and other defendants, Civil Action No. 95 Civ. 1365
(JFK), alleging, inter alia, that the defendants were liable for civil
damages under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act
SNIPPETS:
|
|
5
.
FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER - DEF FLAHERTY
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COMMISSION COMPLAINT COURT FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION RECEIVER METROPOLITAN COMMUNICATIONS JUDGEMENT ACT MONETARY RELIEF REDRESS CONSUMERS SALE DEFENDANTS PURSUANT ASSET PERMANENT INJUNCTION MICHAEL FLAHERTY INVESTMENT FALSELY REPRESENTING UNITED STATES DISTRICT PRACTICES TELEMARKETING SMR LICENSE IMPLICATION PLAINTIFF MATERIALS INVESTMENT OFFERING TELEMARKETED PRODUCT NATIONWIDE DIGITAL DATA |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff
vs.
METROPOLITAN COMMUNICATIONS CORP., et al., Defendants
94 Civ. 0142 (JSR)
FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION
AND FOR SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS FOR MONETARY RELIEF
AS TO DEFENDANT MICHAEL FLAHERTY
Plaintiff, Federal Trade Commission ("Commission") commenced this
action by filing its Complaint against Michael Flaherty and others on
January 11, 1994, alleging that they engaged in unfair or deceptive
acts and practices in violation of Section 5 of the Federal Trade
Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45 (the "Act"), and seeking a permanent
injunction and redress for injured consumers, pursuant to Section
13(b) of the Act, 15 U.S.C.§ 53(b).
On January 14, 1994 the Court entered an ex parte Temporary
Restraining Order and asset freeze against all defendants and
appointed a Temporary Receiver for the corporate defendants,
Metropolitan Communications Corp., Columbia Communications Service
Corp., Nationwide Digital Data Corp., and Stephens Sinclair, Ltd.
(collectively, "the Receivership Companies"). On January 31, 1994 this
Court entered a Stipulated Order for Preliminary Injunction With Asset
Freeze as to defendant Flaherty ("the Stipulated Order"), and
appointed Daniel R. Goodman, Esq., Permanent Receiver ("the Receiver")
for the Receivership Companies.
Michael Flaherty and the Commission have stipulated to the entry of
the following Final Judgment and Order in settlement of the
Commission's Complaint against Flaherty. Being advised in the
premises, the Court enters the following Order.
FINDINGS
1. This is an action by the Commission instituted under Sections 5 and
13(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 45 and 53(b).
The Complaint seeks both permanent injunctive relief and consumer
redress for alleged deceptive acts or practices by Flaherty and others
in connection with the promotion and sale of application preparation
and filing services for Specialized Mobile Radio ("SMR") licenses
issued by the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") and
investments in systems using those licenses.
SNIPPETS:
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
