LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

FTC v MAG-TOPIA INC Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: FVMTI89286, CourtCode: FED, CourtName: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff: FTC, State: CA California, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>FVMTI89286, Act, Telemarketing, Consumers, Prize, Commission, Ftc Act, Federal Trade Commission, Telemarketing Sales Rule, Robert Flarida, Relief, Telemarketing Sales, Judgement, Mti, Prize Promotion, Practices, Defendant Robert, Promotion, Violations, Money Order, Consumers Pay, Complaint, Violation, Salespeople, Amount, District, Entry, Consumer Redress, Request, Sales, Numerous Instances, Employees, Permanent, Redress, Purposes, Agents, Directors, Account, Injunction, Equitable Relief, Magazine, Award , ContentID: 120247489

Case Documents
1   STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 117866
7 pages
HTML
2   COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 117865
7 pages
PDF
3   COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 117864
7 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 3 documents , 21 pages
Price: $ 29.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
ROBERT FLARIDA
JUDGEMENT
DEFENDANT ROBERT
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
BUSINESS
ENTRY
COURT
SALES
EMPLOYEES
ACT
PROMOTION
PERMANENT
REDRESS
ATTORNEYS
COMPLAINT
TELEMARKETING
PRIZE PROMOTION
PURPOSES
AGENTS
DIRECTORS
ACCOUNT
CONSUMER REDRESS
RELIEF
FTC ACT
HEREBY
OFFICERS
REPRESENTATIVES
ASSETS
SOLICITATION
                    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                   FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

                         FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

                                 Plaintiff,

                                     v.

                MAG-TOPIA, INC. ("MTI") and ROBERT FLARIDA,

                                Defendants.

                       Case No. SACV 97-447AHS (ANx)

                         STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT
                          AND ORDER FOR PERMANENT
                      INJUNCTION AND CONSUMER REDRESS
                           AGAINST ROBERT FLARIDA


   STEPHEN CALKINS
   General Counsel

   ANN I. JONES
   RUSSELL S. DEITCH

   Federal Trade Commission
   11000 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 13209
   Los Angeles, California 90024
   (310) 235-4040

   TARA M. FLYNN

   Federal Trade Commission
   6th Street & Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
   Room H-238
   Washington, D.C. 20580
   (202) 326-3710

   Attorneys for Plaintiff

   On May 19, 1997, Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission ("Commission"),
   filed a complaint for permanent injunction and other relief in this
   matter, pursuant to Sections 13(b) and 19 of the Federal Trade
   Commission Act ("FTC Act"), 15 U.S.C. § 53(b) and 57b, and the
   Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud Abuse Prevention Act, 15 U.S.C.
   6101 et. seq., against Mag-Topia, Inc. ("MTI") and Robert Flarida
SNIPPETS:
  • FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
  • MAG-TOPIA, INC. and ROBERT FLARIDA,
  • AND ORDER FOR PERMANENT
  • INJUNCTION AND CONSUMER REDRESS
  • Attorneys for Plaintiff
  • On May 19, 1997, Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission, filed a complaint for permanent
  • Plaintiff alleged in its complaint that Defendants violated Section 5 of the FTC Act, 15
  • The Commission and Defendant Robert Flarida, by and through counsel, have agreed to the entry
  • IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that:
  • The complaint states a claim upon which relief may be granted against Defendant under
  • This Final Judgment does not constitute and shall not be interpreted to constitute either an
  • For purposes of this Order, "Defendant" means Robert Flarida, and his successors, assigns,
  • The term does not include the solicitation of sales through the mailing of a catalog which: catalog and during those calls takes orders only without further solicitation.
  • RELEASE OF ASSETS
  • IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that by signing this Stipulated Final Judgment and Order Defendant
  • IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Robert Flarida, is hereby permanently enjoined from
  • Provide representatives of the Commission, upon reasonable notice and without restraint or

  • 2 . COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    ACT
    PRIZE
    TELEMARKETING
    DEFENDANTS
    PROMOTION
    FTC ACT
    VIOLATION
    TELEMARKETING SALES RULE
    TELEMARKETING SALES
    MTI
    COMMISSION
    PRACTICES
    RELIEF
    CONSUMERS PAY
    MONEY ORDER
    SALESPEOPLE
    AMOUNT
    FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
    AFFECTING COMMERCE
    COURT
    TRANSACTS
    PRIZE WORTH
    REQUEST
    MAGAZINES
    DISCLOSE
    ENFORCEMENT
    DISTRICT
    CONSUMER REDRESS
    TRANSACTED BUSINESS
    
     1 STEPHEN CALKINS
           General Counsel
     2 ANN I. JONES
     3 RUSSELL S. DEITCH
           Federal Trade Commission
     4 11000 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 13209
           Los Angeles, CA 90024
     5 (310) 235-4040
     6 TARA M. FLYNN
           Federal Trade Commission
     7 6th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
           Washington, DC 20580
     8 (202) 326-3710
    
     9 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
           FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
    10                                                 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    11                                      FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
    12
                                                                            )
    13 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,                                              ))
    14                           Plaintiff,                                   )
                                                                              )  CIVIL NO.
    15                                      v.                                )
                                                                              )
    16 MAG-TOPIA, INC. ("MTI") and                                            )   COMPLAINT FOR
           ROBERT FLARIDA,                                                    )   AND OTHER EQUITABLE
    17                                                                        )
                      Defendants.                                             )
    18                                                                       )
    
    19                Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC" or "Commission"), for its
    20                1.         The FTC brings this action under Sections 13(b) and 19 of the Federal
    21 Commission Act ("FTC Act"), 15 U.S.C. §§ 53(b) and 57b, and the Telemarketing and Consumer
    22 Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act ("Telemarketing Act"), 15 U.S.C. § 6101  et seq., to obtain
    23 preliminary and permanent injunctive relief, rescission or reformation of contracts, restitution,
    24 disgorgement, appointment of a receiver, and other equitable relief for defendants' unfair or
    25 acts or practices in violation of Section 5(a) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(a), and the
    26 Commission's Telemarketing Sales Rule, 16 C.F.R. Part 310.
    27
    28                                                                               1
    
    
    
     1                                       JURISDICTION AND VENUE
     2           2.      This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28
    
     3 §§ 1331, 1337(a), and 1345 and 15 U.S.C. §§ 53(b), 57b, 6102(c), and 6105(b).
     4           3.      Venue in the Central District of California is proper under §§ 28 U.S.C. §
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Federal Trade Commission
  • 21 Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 53and 57b, and the Telemarketing and Consumer
  • 24 disgorgement, appointment of a receiver, and other equitable relief for defendants' unfair
  • 26 Commission's Telemarketing Sales Rule,
  • enforcement of Section 5of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45, which prohibits unfair or deceptive
  • 12 federal district court proceedings to enjoin violations of the FTC Act in order to secure
  • 13 relief as is appropriate in each case, and to obtain consumer redress.
  • 16 MTI transacts or has transacted business in this District.
  • promotion scheme in the guise of a prize promotion.
  • The defendants' salespeople telephone
  • consumers, many of them senior citizens, throughout the United States and notify them that
  • The MTI salespeople typically inform these
  • 11 pay a processing fee and send a check or money order to MTI by overnight mail.
  • 12 salespeople request as a processing fee ranges from $250.00 to $900.00.
  • 13 MTI's salespeople instruct consumers to write "magazines" or "magazine package" on the memo
  • 17 requested amount of money.
  • promotions will receive a prize worth more than the amount that consumers pay to the
  • 10 constitute deceptive acts or practices in violation of Section 5of the FTC Act,
  • 21 disclose, in a clear and conspicuous manner and before a customer pays for goods or

  • 3 . COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    CONSUMERS
    ACT
    DEFENDANTS
    PRIZE
    FTC ACT
    TELEMARKETING SALES RULE
    PRIZE PROMOTION
    FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
    VIOLATIONS
    TELEMARKETING SALES
    RELIEF
    MTI
    PRACTICES
    COURT
    MONEY ORDER
    NUMEROUS INSTANCES
    PLAINTIFF
    DISTRICT
    CONSUMERS PAY
    COMPLAINT
    INJUNCTION
    EQUITABLE RELIEF
    MAGAZINE
    SALESPEOPLE
    AWARD
    AMOUNT
    SELLERS
    REQUEST
    PAYMENT
    
                            UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                       FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
    
                             FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
    
                                     Plaintiff,
    
                                     CIVIL NO.
    
                                         v.
    
                    MAG-TOPIA, INC. ("MTI") and ROBERT FLARIDA,
    
                                    Defendants.
    
                              COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTION
                             AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF
    
    
       STEPHEN CALKINS
       General Counsel
    
       ANN I. JONES
       RUSSELL S. DEITCH
    
       Federal Trade Commission
       11000 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 13209
       Los Angeles, CA 90024
       (310) 235-4040
    
       TARA M. FLYNN
    
       Federal Trade Commission
       6th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
       Washington, DC 20580
       (202) 326-3710
    
       ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
       FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
    
       Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC" or "Commission"), for
       its Complaint alleges:
    
       1. The FTC brings this action under Sections 13(b) and 19 of the
       Federal Trade Commission Act ("FTC Act"), 15 U.S.C. §§ 53(b) and 57b,
       and the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act
       ("Telemarketing Act"), 15 U.S.C. § 6101 et seq., to obtain preliminary
       and permanent injunctive relief, rescission or reformation of
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
  • FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
  • FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
  • COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTION
  • AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF
  • ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
  • Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission, for its Complaint alleges:
  • The FTC brings this action under Sections 13and 19 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 nd the Commission's Telemarketing Sales Rule, 16 C.F.R. Part
  • The Commission is charged, inter alia, with enforcement of Section 5of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C.
  • The Commission also enforces the Telemarketing Sales Rule, which prohibits deceptive and
  • The Commission is authorized to initiate federal district court proceedings to enjoin
  • Defendant Robert Flarida is president and sole owner of defendant MTI.
  • At all times relevant to this complaint, the defendants have maintained a substantial course
  • Defendants MTI and Robert Flarida have operated a magazine promotion scheme in the guise of a
  • The defendants' salespeople telephone consumers, many of them senior citizens, throughout the
  • MTI's salespeople instruct consumers that in order to receive their prize, they must pay a
  • The amount MTI's salespeople request as a processing fee ranges from $250.00 to $900.00.
  • In numerous instances, MTI's salespeople instruct consumers to write "magazines" or "magazine
  • As a result of MTI salespeople's oral assurances that consumers have been selected to receive
  • In numerous instances in connection with their telemarketing of prize promotions, the
  • Defendants are "sellers" or "telemarketers" engaged in "telemarketing" of a "prize promotion"
  • The Telemarketing Sales Rule prohibits telemarketers and sellers from failing to disclose, in
  • This Court, in the exercise of its equitable jurisdiction, may award other ancillary relief
  •    |