LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

FTC v KEVIN DRAKE Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: FVKD82067, CourtCode: FED, CourtName: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff: FTC, State: TX Texas, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>FVKD82067, Credit, Act, Consumers, Credit Repair, Credit Repair Organizations, Credit File, Ftc Act, Relief, Commission, Violations, Practices, Sale, Federal Trade Commission, District, Injunction, Credit Purposes, Complaint, Affecting Commerce, Credit Histories, Texas, Deceptive Acts, Offering, Credit Records, Credit Ratings, Tin, Concealing Adverse , ContentID: 120247478

Case Documents
1   COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 117838
6 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 6 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
ACT
CONSUMERS
CREDIT REPAIR
CREDIT REPAIR ORGANIZATIONS
CREDIT FILE
FTC ACT
RELIEF
COMMISSION
VIOLATIONS
DEFENDANT
PRACTICES
COURT
SALE
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
PLAINTIFF
DISTRICT
INJUNCTION
CREDIT PURPOSES
BUSINESS
COMPLAINT
AFFECTING COMMERCE
CREDIT HISTORIES
TEXAS
DECEPTIVE ACTS
OFFERING
CREDIT RECORDS
CREDIT RATINGS
TIN
CONCEALING ADVERSE
                        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                     FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
                              DALLAS DIVISION

                  THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff,

                                     v.

       KEVIN DRAKE, an individual, doing business as NEW CREDIT '98,
                                 Defendant.

                              CIVIL ACTION NO.

                 COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER RELIEF

   Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC" or "Commission") for
   its Complaint alleges:

   1. The Commission brings this action under Sections 13(b) and 19 of
   the Federal Trade Commission Act ("FTC Act"), 15 U.S.C. §§ 53(b) and
   57b, and Section 410(b) of the Credit Repair Organizations Act, 15
   U.S.C. § 1679h(b), to obtain preliminary and permanent injunctive
   relief, restitution, rescission, disgorgement and other equitable
   relief for Defendant's deceptive acts or practices in connection with
   the sale and offering for sale of credit repair products in violation
   of Section 5(a) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(a), and Section
   404(a)(2) of the Credit Repair Organizations Act, 15 U.S.C.
   1679b(a)(2).

                           JURISDICTION AND VENUE

   2. This Court has jurisdiction of this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
   1331, 1337(a), 1345, and 15 U.S.C. §§ 53(b), 57b, and 1679h(b).

   3. Venue in this District is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1391 and 15
   U.S.C. § 53(b).

                                THE PARTIES

   4. Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission, is an independent agency
   of the United States Government created by statute. 15 U.S.C. §§ 41 et
   seq. The Commission is charged, inter alia, with enforcement of
   Section 5(a) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(a), which prohibits unfair
   or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce. The
   Commission also enforces the Credit Repair Organizations Act. 15
   U.S.C. §§ 1679h(a). The Commission is authorized to initiate federal
   district court proceedings, by its own attorneys, to enjoin violations
   of the FTC Act and the Credit Repair Organizations Act in order to
SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
  • FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
  • THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff,
  • KEVIN DRAKE, an individual, doing business as NEW CREDIT '98,
  • COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER RELIEF
  • the Federal Trade Commission for its Complaint alleges:
  • The Commission brings this action under Sections 13and 19 of the Federal Trade Commission Section 404of the Credit Repair Organizations Act, 15 U.S.C.
  • The Commission is charged, inter alia, with enforcement of Section 5of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C.
  • The Commission is authorized to initiate federal district court proceedings, by its own
  • Defendant Kevin Drake is an individual doing business as New Credit '98, with his office and
  • At all times relevant to this complaint, defendant has maintained a substantial course of
  • Since at least 1998, defendant has advertised, promoted, offered for sale, and sold credit
  • Defendant has claimed that he can improve consumers' credit histories, credit records, or
  • Defendant has further claimed that use of the TIN in this manner is legal.
  • Section 404of the Credit Repair Organizations Act prohibits all persons from making any t to the consumer or to whom the consumer has applied or is applying for an extension of credit.
  • Sections 13and 19 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 53and 57b, and Section 410of the Credit Repair remedial measures.
  •    |