LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

FTC v JARRELL ANDRE GOOLSBY Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: FVJAG136282, CourtCode: FED, CourtName: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff: FTC, State: GA Georgia, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>FVJAG136282, Act, Telemarketing, Consumers, Ftc Act, Credit, Violations, Telemarketing Sales Rule, Relief, Commission, Credit Card, Practices, Fee, Georgia, District, Federal Trade Commission, Complaint, Equitable Relief, Obtaining, United States, Injunction, Affecting Commerce, Redress, Representations, Numerous Instances, Extensions, Major Credit Card, Payment , ContentID: 120247467

Case Documents
1   COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 117811
5 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 5 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
TELEMARKETING
CONSUMERS
FTC ACT
CREDIT
DEFENDANT
VIOLATIONS
TELEMARKETING SALES RULE
COURT
RELIEF
COMMISSION
CREDIT CARD
PRACTICES
FEE
GEORGIA
DISTRICT
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
PLAINTIFF
COMPLAINT
EQUITABLE RELIEF
OBTAINING
UNITED STATES
INJUNCTION
AFFECTING COMMERCE
REDRESS
REPRESENTATIONS
NUMEROUS INSTANCES
EXTENSIONS
MAJOR CREDIT CARD
PAYMENT
                        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                        NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
                              ATLANTA DIVISION

     FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff,

     v.

     JARRELL ANDRE GOOLSBY, individually and doing business as CONCEPTS
     & IDEAS, Defendant.

                              CIVIL ACTION NO.

                     COMPLAINT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION
                         AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF

   Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC" or "the Commission"),
   for its complaint alleges:

   1. The FTC brings this action under Sections 13(b) and 19 of the
   Federal Trade Commission Act ("FTC Act"), 15 U.S.C. §§ 53(b) and 57b,
   and the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act
   ("Telemarketing Act"), 15 U.S.C. §§ 6101 et seq., to secure permanent
   injunctive relief, rescission or reformation of contracts,
   restitution, disgorgement, and other equitable relief for defendant's
   deceptive acts or practices in violation of Section 5(a) of the FTC
   Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(a), and the FTC's Telemarketing Sales Rule, 16
   C.F.R. Part 310.

                           JURISDICTION AND VENUE

   2. This Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
   §§ 1331, 1337(a), and 1345, and 15 U.S.C. §§ 53(b), 57b, 6102(c), and
   6105(b).

   3. Venue in the United States District Court for the Northern District
   of Georgia is proper under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b) and (c), and 15 U.S.C.
   § 53(b).

                                 PLAINTIFF

   4. Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission, is an independent agency
   of the United States Government created by statute. 15 U.S.C. §§ 41 et
   seq. The Commission is charged, inter alia, with enforcement of
   Section 5(a) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(a), which prohibits unfair
   or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce. The
   Commission also enforces the Telemarketing Sales Rule, 16 C.F.R. Part
   310, which prohibits deceptive and abusive telemarketing acts or
SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
  • FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff,
  • JARRELL ANDRE GOOLSBY, individually and doing business as CONCEPTS & IDEAS, Defendant.
  • COMPLAINT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION
  • AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF
  • Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission, for its complaint alleges:
  • The FTC brings this action under Sections 13and 19 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 t 310.
  • Venue in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia is proper
  • The Commission is charged, inter alia, with enforcement of Section 5of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C.
  • The Commission also enforces the Telemarketing Sales Rule, 16 C.F.R. Part 310, which
  • The Commission is authorized to initiate federal district court proceedings, by its own
  • Since at least May 1996 and continuing until approximately August 1996, the defendant, in
  • Acting as a telemarketer for a company known as SureCheK Systems, Inc. d/b/a Consumer Credit
  • that regardless of the consumers' past credit history, the consumers were offered an
  • that consumers are guaranteed to receive a major credit card or that there is a high
  • In numerous instances, in connection with telemarketing offers to provide credit cards to
  • The Telemarketing Sales Rule prohibits telemarketers and sellers from, inter alia, requesting
  • In numerous instances, in connection with telemarketing offers to obtain extensions of credit
  •    |