LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

FTC v INTERSTATE RESOURCE CORP Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: FVIRC159546, CourtCode: FED, CourtName: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff: FTC, State: NY New York, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>FVIRC159546, Federal Trade Commission, Act, Tila, York, Southern District, Pursuant, Ftc, Regulation, James Ludlow, Complaint, Interstate Resource, John, Hoepa, General Counsel, United States, Stipulate, Lending Act, Violations, Consumers, Credit, Hoepa Mortgage Loan, Ftc Act, Loan, York Corporation, Mortgage, Interstate, Permanent, Practices, Transaction, Relief, Compliance, Valentine, Injunction, Equitable Relief Pursuant, Home Ownership, Equity Protection Act, Disclose, Commission, District, Requiring , ContentID: 120247462

Case Documents
1   STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 117797
15 pages
HTML
2   COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 117796
7 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 2 documents , 22 pages
Price: $ 24.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
ACT
TILA
YORK
COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT
PURSUANT
FTC
PLAINTIFF
JAMES LUDLOW
ATTORNEY
INTERSTATE RESOURCE
COMPLAINT
JOHN
BUSINESS
GENERAL COUNSEL
UNITED STATES
STIPULATE
REGULATION
HOEPA MORTGAGE LOAN
YORK CORPORATION
LENDING ACT
PERMANENT
COMPLIANCE
VALENTINE
INJUNCTION
EQUITABLE RELIEF PURSUANT
HOME OWNERSHIP
EQUITY PROTECTION ACT
   DEBRA A. VALENTINE
   General Counsel

   MICHAEL J. BLOOM (MB 7732)
   RHONDA J. MCLEAN (RM 9140)
   DONALD G. D'AMATO (DD 3008)

   Federal Trade Commission
   One Bowling Green, Suite 318
   New York, New York 10004
   (212) 607-2829

   Attorneys for Plaintiff

                        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                       SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

                         FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
                                 Plaintiff,

                                     v.

    INTERSTATE RESOURCE CORP., a New York Corporation, JAMES LUDLOW, and
                               JOHN O'BRIEN,
                                Defendants.


                                 Civil No.

                    STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER

   Plaintiff, Federal Trade Commission ("Commission"), has filed a
   Complaint for a permanent injunction and other equitable relief
   pursuant to Sections 5(a) and 13(b) of the Federal Trade Commission
   Act ("FTC Act"), 15 U.S.C. §§ 45(a) and 53(b), and Section 108(c) of
   the Truth in Lending Act ("TILA"), 15 U.S.C. § 1607(c), alleging that
   defendants Interstate Resource Corp., James Ludlow, and John O'Brien
   ("defendants") have violated TILA, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601-1666j, as
   amended, including, but not limited to, the Home Ownership and Equity
   Protection Act of 1994 ("HOEPA"), as amended, TILA's implementing
   Regulation Z, 12 C.F.R. 226, as amended, and/or Section 5(a) of the
   FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(a), as amended.

   Plaintiff and defendants, by and through their respective counsel,
   have agreed to entry of this Stipulated Final Judgment and Order
   ("Order") by this Court, without trial or adjudication of any issue of
   fact or law. The said parties having requested the Court to enter this
   Order, it is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as follows:
SNIPPETS:
  • DEBRA A. VALENTINE
  • General Counsel
  • Federal Trade Commission One Bowling Green,
  • New York, New York 10004
  • Attorneys for Plaintiff
  • INTERSTATE RESOURCE CORP., a New York Corporation, JAMES LUDLOW, and
  • Plaintiff, Federal Trade Commission, has filed a Complaint for a permanent injunction and on Act of 1994, as amended, TILA's implementing Regulation Z, 12 C.F.R. 226, as amended, and/or
  • Plaintiff and defendants, by and through their respective counsel, have agreed to entry of
  • Venue in the Southern District of New York is proper.
  • Defendants, while neither admitting nor denying any of the allegations of wrongdoing set
  • The terms "annual percentage rate," "consumer," "consumer credit," "consummation," "credit,"
  • The term "HOEPA" means the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act of 1994 which, inter
  • E. The term "TILA" means the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601-1666j, as amended.
  • Injunction Against HOEPA and Related FTC Act Violations
  • IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendants, and each of them, their successors, assigns, :
  • IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants, and each of them, their successors, assigns, officers, ce" is defined in Section 4 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 44, are permanently restrained and enjoined
  • If the Commission determines, in its sole discretion, that redress to consumers is wholly or
  • Commission's Authority To Monitor Compliance
  • JUDGMENT IS THEREFORE ENTERED under the terms and conditions recited above, each party to
  • JOHN O'BRIEN

  • 2 . COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    HOEPA
    REGULATION
    VIOLATIONS
    CONSUMERS
    CREDIT
    TILA
    FTC ACT
    LOAN
    MORTGAGE
    INTERSTATE
    PRACTICES
    TRANSACTION
    RELIEF
    DISCLOSE
    COMMISSION
    COURT
    FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
    PLAINTIFF
    DISTRICT
    REQUIRING
    YORK
    PAYMENT
    COMPLAINT
    EQUITABLE RELIEF
    BUSINESS
    LENDING ACT
    FEES
    ASSIGNEE
    
       DEBRA A. VALENTINE
       General Counsel
    
       MICHAEL J. BLOOM (MB 7732)
       RHONDA J. MCLEAN (RM 9140)
       DONALD G. D'AMATO (DD 3008)
    
       Federal Trade Commission
       One Bowling Green, Suite 318
       New York, New York 10004
       (212) 607-2829
    
       Attorneys for Plaintiff
    
                            UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                           SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
    
                        FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff,
    
                                         v.
    
        INTERSTATE RESOURCE CORP., a New York Corporation, JAMES LUDLOW, and
                             JOHN O'BRIEN, Defendants.
    
                                     Civil No.
    
           COMPLAINT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF
    
       Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission ("Commission"), by its
       undersigned attorneys, alleges as follows:
    
                               Jurisdiction and Venue
    
       1. This is an action under Sections 5(a) and 13(b) of the Federal
       Trade Commission Act ("FTC Act"), 15 U.S.C. §§ 45(a) and 53(b), and
       Section 108(c) of the Truth in Lending Act ("TILA"), 15 U.S.C.
       § 1607(c), to obtain preliminary and permanent injunctive relief,
       rescission, restitution, reformation, disgorgement, and other
       equitable relief against defendants for engaging in acts or practices
       in violation of TILA, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601-1666j, as amended, including,
       but not limited to, the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act of
       1994 ("HOEPA"), as amended, and TILA's implementing Regulation Z, 12
       C.F.R. 226, as amended, and for unfair or deceptive acts or practices
       in violation of Section 5(a) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(a), as
       amended.
    
       2. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this matter
       pursuant to 15 U.S.C. §§ 45(a), 53(b), and 1607(c), and 28 U.S.C.
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • New York, New York 10004
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
  • SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
  • FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff,
  • JOHN O'BRIEN, Defendants.
  • COMPLAINT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF
  • This is an action under Sections 5and 13of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ as amended, and TILA's implementing Regulation Z, 12 C.F.R. 226, as amended, and for unfair or
  • The terms "annual percentage rate," "consumer," "consumer credit," "consummation," "credit,"
  • HOEPA, which took effect on October 1, 1995, provides special protections for consumers who
  • The term "TILA" means the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601-1666j, as amended.
  • TILA, which took effect on July 1, 1969, is intended to promote the informed use of consumer
  • Plaintiff, the Commission, is an independent agency of the United States Government created
  • Defendant Interstate Resource Corp., is a for-profit corporation organized, existing, and
  • Approximately 25% of defendants' HOEPA mortgage loans with terms of fifteen years contain a
  • Violations of HOEPA and FTC Act
  • In the course and conduct of offering and making HOEPA mortgage loans, defendant Interstate
  •    |