 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
TEMP RESTRAINING ORDER
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
RECEIVERSHIP DEFENDANT COURT FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION BUSINESS ACT RECEIVER OFFICERS INJUNCTION ASSETS UNITED STATES TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER EQUITABLE RELIEF ITA MATTER PURSUANT ONLINE CONSULTING GROUP COMPLAINT SUBSIDIARIES ACCOUNTS SUCCESSORS AFFILIATES INTERNATIONAL TELEMEDIA ARJUNA DIAZ DAVID PETERSON POSSESSION EMPLOYEES UNITED STATES DISTRICT REQUESTS AUDIOTEXT SERVICES |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
v.
INTERNATIONAL TELEMEDIA ASSOCIATES, INC., also doing business as ITA;
ARJUNA DIAZ, a/k/a RONALD P. DIAZ, individually and as an officer of
International Telemedia Associates, Inc.; GERARD ROBERT ENGLE,
individually and as an officer of International Telemedia Associates,
Inc.; ONLINE CONSULTING GROUP, INC.; and DAVID PETERSON, JR.,
individually and as an officer of Online Consulting Group, Inc.,
Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION NO.
1:98-CV-1935
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
WITH OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF
Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission ("Commission"), having filed
its complaint for a permanent injunction and other relief in this
matter, pursuant to Sections 13(b) and 19(a) of the Federal Trade
Commission Act ("FTC Act"), 15 U.S.C. §§ 53(b) and 57b(a), and the
Telephone Disclosure and Dispute Resolution Act of 1992 ("TDDRA"), 15
U.S.C. § 5701 et. seq., having moved for an ex parte Temporary
Restraining Order pursuant to Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 65), and for other equitable relief,
including appointment of a receiver, an asset freeze, expedited
discovery and an order to show cause why a preliminary injunction
should not issue, and the Court having considered the complaint,
declarations, exhibits, and memorandum of law filed in support
thereof, and now being advised in the premises finds that:
1. This Court has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this case and
there is good cause to believe it has jurisdiction of all parties
hereto;
2. There is good cause to believe that the Commission will ultimately
succeed in establishing that defendants have engaged and are likely to
engage in acts and practices that violate Section 5(a) of the FTC Act,
15 U.S.C. § 45(a), and the Federal Trade Commission Trade Regulation
Rule entitled "Trade Regulation Rule Pursuant to the Telephone
Disclosure and Dispute Resolution Act of 1992" (the "900-Number
SNIPPETS:
|
|
2
.
STIP FINAL JUDGMENT - DEFS ONLINE CONSULTING
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DAVID PETERSON FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ONLINE CONSULTING GROUP COURT FTC ACT JUDGEMENT ENTRY COMPLAINT PERMANENT INJUNCTION BUSINESS PLAINTIFF FEDERAL TRADE DISPUTE RESOLUTION TELEPHONE-BILLED TRANSACTION ARJUNA DIAZ COUNSEL RECEIVERSHIP DEFENDANT AUDIOTEXT SERVICE VIOLATING MISREPRESENTATION COMPLIANCE PARAGRAPH UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVES EMPLOYEES SUBSCRIBER PROVISION A/K/A RONALD TELEPHONE DISCLOSURE PROMOTING |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
)
Plaintiff,
v.
INTERNATIONAL TELEMEDIA ASSOCIATES, INC.,
also doing business as ITA;
ARJUNA DIAZ, a/k/a RONALD P. DIAZ, individually and )
as an officer of International Telemedia Associates, Inc.;
GERARD ROBERT ENGLE, individually and )
as an officer of International Telemedia Associates, Inc.;
ONLINE CONSULTING GROUP, INC.; and
DAVID PETERSON, JR., individually and
as an officer of Online Consulting Group, Inc., )
Defendants.
)
STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT AND
ORDER FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION AS TO
DEFENDANTS ONLINE CONSULTING GROUP, INC.
AND DAVID PETERSON, JR.
Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC" or "Commission"), has filed its
permanent injunction and other relief pursuant to Sections 13(b) and 19 of the Federal Trade
Act ("FTC Act"), 15 U.S.C. §§ 53(b) and 57b, and the Telephone Disclosure and Dispute Resolution Act
of 1992 ("TDDRA"), 15 U.S.C. § 5701 et seq., charging, inter alia, defendants Online Consulting
D:\3Online Order.wpd 1
Inc. and David Peterson, Jr. with violating Section 5 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45 and the FTC's
900-Number Rule, 16 C.F.R. Part 308.
SNIPPETS:
|
|
3
.
STIP FINAL JUDGMENT - DEF ENGLE
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COMMISSION EMPLOYEES BUSINESS FTC COMPLAINT COURT COMPLIANCE TELEPHONE-BILLED TRANSACTION DIRECTS FEDERAL TRADE FTC ACT ENTRY CONSUMER HEREBY PROVIDER PURPOSES REPRESENTATIVES UNITED STATES SUBSCRIBER PERMANENT INJUNCTION JUDGEMENT PERSONNEL AUDIOTEXT SERVICE PROVISION PARTIES NORTHERN DISTRICT OFFICER REFUND REQUEST RESPONSE |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, )
)
Plaintiff,
v.
INTERNATIONAL TELEMEDIA ASSOCIATES, INC.,
also doing business as ITA;
ARJUNA DIAZ, a/k/a RONALD P. DIAZ, individually and )
as an officer of International Telemedia Associates, Inc.;
GERARD ROBERT ENGLE, individually and
as an officer of International Telemedia Associates, Inc.;
ONLINE CONSULTING GROUP, INC.; and
DAVID PETERSON, JR., individually and
as an officer of Online Consulting Group, Inc., )
Defendants.
)
STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT AND
ORDER FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION AS TO
DEFENDANT GERARD ROBERT ENGLE
Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC" or "Commission"), filed its Complaint
permanent injunction and other relief pursuant to Sections 13(b) and 19 of the Federal Trade
Commission Act ("FTC Act"), 15 U.S.C. §§ 53(b) and 57b, charging, inter alia, defendant Gerard
Robert Engle ("Defendant") with violating Section 5 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45. The FTC and
Defendant, by and through counsel, have agreed to the entry of this Stipulated Final Judgment and
FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER 1
Order for Permanent Injunction ("Order") by this Court to resolve all disputed matters between them
this action.
SNIPPETS:
|
|
4
.
COMPLAINT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
ITA DEFENDANTS ACT COMPLAINT FTC AUDIOTEXT SERVICES BUSINESS PRACTICES RELIEF SUBSCRIBER COURT CHARGES CONSUMERS FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION TOLL-FREE TELEPHONE BILLS INTERNATIONAL TELEMEDIA DECEPTIVE ACTS GERARD ROBERT ENGLE PLAINTIFF NUMEROUS INSTANCES ADVERTISEMENTS ITA REPRESENTATIVES UNITED STATES ONLINE CONSULTING GROUP DAVID PETERSON EQUITABLE RELIEF INJUNCTIVE RELIEF VENDOR CLIENTS |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
v.
INTERNATIONAL TELEMEDIA ASSOCIATES, INC., also doing business as ITA;
ARJUNA DIAZ, a/k/a RONALD P. DIAZ, individually and as an officer of
International Telemedia Associates, Inc.; GERARD ROBERT ENGLE,
individually and as an officer of International Telemedia Associates,
Inc.; ONLINE CONSULTING GROUP, INC.; and DAVID PETERSON, JR.,
individually and as an officer of Online Consulting Group, Inc.,
Defendants.
CIVIL NO. 1:98-CV-1935
COMPLAINT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION
AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF
Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC" or "Commission"), for
its Complaint alleges:
1. The FTC brings this action under Sections 13(b) and 19 of the
Federal Trade Commission Act ("FTC Act"), 15 U.S.C. §§ 53(b) and 57b,
and the Telephone Disclosure and Dispute Resolution Act of 1992
("TDDRA"), 15 U.S.C. § 5701 et seq., to obtain preliminary and
permanent injunctive relief, restitution, disgorgement, and other
equitable relief for defendants' unfair or deceptive acts or practices
in violation of Section 5(a) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(a), and
the FTC's 900-Number Rule, 16 C.F.R. Part 308.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
2. Subject matter jurisdiction is conferred upon this Court by 15
U.S.C. §§ 45(a), 53(b), 57b, 5711, and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1337(a), and
1345.
3. Venue in this district is proper under 15 U.S.C. § 53(b) and 28
U.S.C. §§ 1391(b) and (c).
THE PARTIES
4. Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission, is an independent agency
of the United States Government created by statute. 15 U.S.C. § 41 et
SNIPPETS:
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
