LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

FTC v INFODIRECT INC Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: FVII98352, CourtCode: FED, CourtName: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff: FTC, State: MA Massachusetts, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>FVII98352, Defendant Mccomb, Commission, Defendant Fletcher, Consumer, Sale, Ftc Act, Complaint, Federal Trade Commission, Telemarketing, Consent Judgment, Entry, Pursuant, Violation, Information Guides, Representatives, Franchise, Plaintiff Commission, Permanent Injunction, Imall, Act, Financial Statement, Provisions, Materials, Los Angeles, Consumer Fraud, Abuse Prevention Act, Internet, Permanent, Paragraph, Employees, Purchase Information Guides, Bank Account, Franchise Rule, Consultant, Relief , ContentID: 120247456

Case Documents
1   CONSENT JUDGMENT - MCCOMB
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 117782
24 pages
PDF
2   CONSENT JUDGMENT - FLETCHER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 117781
21 pages
PDF
3   COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 117780
8 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 3 documents , 53 pages
Price: $ 29.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . CONSENT JUDGMENT - MCCOMB

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COMMISSION
CONSUMER
SALE
CONSENT JUDGMENT
TELEMARKETING
FTC ACT
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
COMPLAINT
ENTRY
PURSUANT
VIOLATION
BUSINESS
PERMANENT INJUNCTION
REPRESENTATIVES
ATTORNEYS
PLAINTIFF COMMISSION
INFORMATION GUIDES
FINANCIAL STATEMENT
PROVISIONS
PARAGRAPH
BUSINESS ENTITY
EMPLOYEES
MATERIALS
LOS ANGELES
CONSUMER FRAUD
ABUSE PREVENTION ACT
PURCHASE INFORMATION GUIDES
BANK ACCOUNT
COMPLIANCE
 1 DEBRA A. VALENTINE
      General Counsel
 2 JOHN D. JACOBS, CA Bar No. 134154
 3 Federal Trade Commission
      10877 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 700
 4 Los Angeles, CA  90024
      (310) 824-4360 voice
 5 (310) 824-4380 fax

 6 Attorney for Plaintiff
 7

 8                           UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
 9                          CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10                                 WESTERN DIVISION
11 ______________________________
                                        )          CV-98-9274 ABC (CTx)
12 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,     )
                                        )          CONSENT JUDGMENT AND ORDER FOR
13                       Plaintiff,     )          PERMANENT INJUNCTION AS TO
                                        )          DEFENDANT JASON C. McCOMB
14                  v.                  ))
15 INFODIRECT, INC., et al.,            ))
16                       Defendants.    )
      ______________________________)
17

18         Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission ("Commission") filed a
19 Complaint for a permanent injunction and other equitable relief

20 pursuant to Sections 13(b) and 19 of the Federal Trade Commission
21 Act ("FTC Act"), 15 U.S.C. §§ 53(b) and 57b, and the Telemarketing

22 and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act, 15 U.S.C. § 6101 et
23 seq.  The Complaint charged Defendant Jason C. McComb ("McComb")

24 with violations of Section 5(a) of the FTC Act, as amended, 15
25 U.S.C. § 45(a), and Sections 310.3(a)(4), 310.3(a)(2)(iii),

26 310.3(a)(3), and 310.3(a)(2)(iv) of the Commission's Telemarketing
27 Sales Rule, 16 C.F.R. Part 310.

28

                                              1



SNIPPETS:
  • 19 Complaint for a permanent injunction and other equitable relief
  • 20 pursuant to Sections 13and 19 of the Federal Trade Commission
  • 21 Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 53and 57b, and the Telemarketing
  • 24 with violations of Section 5of the FTC Act, as amended, 15
  • entry of this Consent Judgment and Order for Permanent Injunction
  • matters in dispute as to Defendant McComb in this action.
  • Defendant McComb has consented to entry of this Order
  • 12 Plaintiff Commission and Defendant McComb having requested the
  • 19 Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act, 15 U.S.C. § 6101 et seq.
  • 21 McComb in connection with the advertising, sale, and offering for
  • PERMANENT BAN ON SALE OF INFORMATION GUIDES AND TELEMARKETING
  • directly, in concert with others, or through any business entity
  • it shall not be a violation of this Paragraph on the
  • 21 through any business entity or other device,
  • and with the provisions of this Order.
  • 10 B. The performance bond required pursuant to this Section
  • 13 servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons or entities
  • 20 consumers who purchase information guides relating to seized cars
  • 17 F. Using a consumer's credit card or bank account number,
  • 27 and his representatives, agents, servants and employees, and all
  • 25 November 24, 1998 financial statement, which contains material
  • E. Copies of all sales scripts, training materials,
  • 19 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in order that compliance with the
  • Los Angeles, California 90024

  • 2 . CONSENT JUDGMENT - FLETCHER

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    COMMISSION
    CONSUMER
    SALE
    COMPLAINT
    FTC ACT
    TELEMARKETING
    ENTRY
    FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
    BUSINESS
    INFORMATION GUIDES
    PERMANENT
    PURSUANT
    CONSENT JUDGMENT
    REPRESENTATIVES
    PLAINTIFF COMMISSION
    VIOLATION
    FINANCIAL STATEMENT
    MATERIALS
    LOS ANGELES
    CONSUMER FRAUD
    ABUSE PREVENTION ACT
    PURCHASE INFORMATION GUIDES
    BANK ACCOUNT
    EMPLOYEES
    PROVISIONS
    UNITED STATES
    PARAGRAPH
    PERMANENT INJUNCTION
    COMPLAINT CHARGED DEFENDANT
    
     1 DEBRA A. VALENTINE
          General Counsel
     2 JOHN D. JACOBS, CA Bar No. 134154
     3 Federal Trade Commission
          10877 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 700
     4 Los Angeles, CA  90024
          (310) 824-4360 voice
     5 (310) 824-4380 fax
    
     6 Attorney for Plaintiff
     7
    
     8                           UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
     9                          CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
    
    10                                 WESTERN DIVISION
    11 ______________________________
                                            )          CV-98-9274 ABC (CTx)
    12 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,     )
                                            )
    13                       Plaintiff,     )          CONSENT JUDGMENT AND ORDER FOR
                                            )          PERMANENT INJUNCTION AS TO
    14                  v.                  )          DEFENDANT THOMAS R. FLETCHER
                                            )
    15 INFODIRECT, INC., et al.,            ))
    16                       Defendants.    )
          ______________________________)
    17
    
    18         Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission ("Commission") filed a
    19 Complaint for a permanent injunction and other equitable relief
    
    20 pursuant to Sections 13(b) and 19 of the Federal Trade Commission
    21 Act ("FTC Act"), 15 U.S.C. §§ 53(b) and 57b, and the Telemarketing
    
    22 and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act, 15 U.S.C. § 6101 et
    23 seq.  The Complaint charged Defendant Thomas R. Fletcher
    
    24 ("Fletcher" or "defendant") with violations of Section 5(a) of the
    25 FTC Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 45(a), and Sections 310.3(a)(4),
    
    26 310.3(a)(2)(iii), 310.3(a)(3), and 310.3(a)(2)(iv) of the
    27 Commission's Telemarketing Sales Rule, 16 C.F.R. Part 310.
    
    28
    
                                                  1
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • 20 pursuant to Sections 13and 19 of the Federal Trade Commission
  • The Complaint charged Defendant Thomas R. Fletcher
  • 25 FTC Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 45, and Sections 310.3,
  • 27 Commission's Telemarketing Sales Rule,
  • entry of this Consent Judgment and Order for Permanent Injunction
  • matters in dispute as to Defendant Fletcher in this action.
  • Defendant Fletcher has consented to entry of this Order
  • 12 Plaintiff Commission and Defendant Fletcher having requested the
  • 18 Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act, 15 U.S.C. § 6101 et seq.
  • 20 Fletcher in connection with the advertising, sale, and offering
  • 24 PERMANENT BAN ON SALE OF INFORMATION GUIDES AND TELEMARKETING
  • 28 through any business entity or other device,
  • 14 consumers who purchase information guides relating to seized cars
  • 11 F. Using a consumer's credit card or bank account number,
  • 12 in violation of Section 310.3of the Telemarketing
  • 24 and his representatives, agents, servants and employees, and all
  • in Paragraph VII of this Order.
  • 23 December 2, 1998 financial statement, which contains material
  • E. Copies of all sales scripts, training materials,
  • provisions of Paragraphs I through IV of this Order;
  • Los Angeles, California 90024
  • 22 (United States District Court, Central District of California, CV-23 98-9274 ABC (CTx)).

  • 3 . COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    IMALL
    ACT
    DEFENDANTS
    FTC ACT
    BUSINESS
    INTERNET
    FRANCHISE RULE
    CONSULTANT
    FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
    RELIEF
    VIOLATIONS
    COURT
    INTERNET YELLOW
    PRACTICES
    EARNINGS
    CONSUMERS
    CENTRAL DISTRICT
    PLAINTIFF
    CALIFORNIA
    COMPLAINT
    DISCLOSURE
    COMMERCE
    PROSPECTIVE FRANCHISEES
    INJUNCTION
    EQUITABLE RELIEF
    CONSULTANT BUSINESS VENTURES
    SELL
    ADVERTISEMENTS
    WEBSITES
    
       DEBRA VALENTINE
       General Counsel
    
       DANIEL P. BARRY (MA BBO Reg. No. 564037)
       SARA V. GREENBERG (MA BBO Reg. No. 547993)
       Federal Trade Commission
       205 Portland Street
       Boston, Massachusetts 02114
       (617) 424-5960 (telephone number)
       (617) 424-5998 (facsimile number)
    
       LINDA M. STOCK (CA Bar No. 143774)
       Federal Trade Commission
       10877 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 700
       Los Angeles, CA 90024
       (310) 824-4316 (telephone number)
       (310) 824-4380 (facsimile number)
    
       ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
       FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
    
                            UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                           CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
                                  WESTERN DIVISION
    
                             FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
    
                                     Plaintiff,
    
                                         v.
    
         IMALL, Inc., a corporation, CRAIG R. PICKERING, an individual, and
                     MARK R. COMER, an individual, Defendants.
    
                                  CIVIL ACTION NO.
    
                              COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTION
                             AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF
    
       Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC" or "the Commission"),
       for its Complaint alleges:
    
       1. The FTC brings this action under Sections 13(b) and 19 of the
       Federal Trade Commission Act ("FTC Act"), 15 U.S.C. §§ 53(b) and 57b,
       to obtain preliminary and permanent injunctive relief, rescission or
       reformation of contracts, restitution, disgorgement, and other
       equitable relief for defendants' deceptive acts or practices in
       violation of Section 5(a) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(a), and the
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Federal Trade Commission
  • ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
  • MARK R. COMER, an individual, Defendants.
  • COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTION
  • AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF
  • Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission, for its Complaint alleges:
  • The FTC brings this action under Sections 13and 19 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 ity Ventures", 16 C.F.R. § 436.
  • Venue in the United States District Court for the Central District of California is proper
  • The Commission is charged, inter alia, with enforcement of Section 5of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C.
  • The Commission also enforces the Franchise Rule.
  • The Commission is authorized to initiate federal district court proceedings to enjoin
  • Defendant iMall, Inc., a Nevada corporation with its principal executive offices located at
  • Since at least July 1995, the defendants have been engaged in a common course of conduct to
  • Both the direct mail pieces and the promotional cassette feature unqualified testimonials
  • The speaker notes that, in return for a $2,995 fee, iMall Consultants obtain the right to
  • The typical speaker gives several examples, including those set forth above, of the specific
  • The Internet Yellow Pages Opportunity
  • The Franchise Rule requires a franchisor to provide prospective franchisees with a complete
  •    |