LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

FTC v EQUINOX INTERNATIONAL CORP Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: FVEIC170710, CourtCode: FED, CourtName: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff: FTC, State: FL Florida, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>FVEIC170710, Act, Assets, Maryland Securities, South Carolina, Practices, Violation, Receivership, Gouldd, Nevada, Equinox, Pennsylvania, Trade, Relief, Unfair, Maryland Securities Commissioner, Equinox Program, Equitable Relief, Hawaii, Commission, Ftc Act, Federal Trade Commission, Receiver, United States, Advanced Marketing Seminars, Distributors, Marketing Program, Marketing, Provisions, Commonwealth, Temporary Receiver, Receivership Entities, Bill Gouldd, Permanent Injunction, Permanent , ContentID: 120247415

Case Documents
1   TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 117701
22 pages
PDF
3   LETTER AGREEMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 117698
2 pages
PDF
4   COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 117697
28 pages
PDF
5 1999-08-03 ORDER PRELIM APPROVING STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 117699
32 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 5 documents , 86 pages
Price: $ 39.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
ASSETS
COMMISSION
COURT
UNITED STATES
TEMPORARY RECEIVER
PLAINTIFF
MARKETING PROGRAM
EQUINOX
BUSINESS
MARKETING PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS
TRADE COMMISSION
WILLIAM GOULDD
ACCOUNT
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
SEMINARS
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
CONTROL
POSSESSION
PENNSYLVANIA
ADVANCED MIALRKETLNG SEMINARS
REQUESTS
FEDERAL TRADE
CONSUMER
TRANSFERS
MATERIALS
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION HEARING
PREMISES
REPRESENTATIVES
NORTH CAROLINA
I  .


                                                                                                   
..*         s  I             ,  -
                                                                      !  t,
                                      _       ,I!..                                                
.  .  .              :       .1;
         ,.        8.1                                        .        I  -
                             .-;,             I         j                                     
                                                                                 `99
                                                              ,*  ,`.                              
                                           hut  5  IQ 30  iiti

                                                   1 A!::$  ,.t,. o,,!!E'::i
                                                                                 .,
                                ..,.,.
                                                                    r  +:`i:  r  t
                                                            L.L:  !I,
                                                                                                   
  . _                      ,I  C.,  I
                                            . .  .
                .._..  -.
                                                        ___..  ~-~ ..-.. _..,-. .--  I*-.
                                                                                                   
                                           IY-             #I.

                                                           a-
                           l%DERAL  TRADE  COMMISSION,                                             
                           STATE  OF  HAWAII,                                                      
                           MARYLAND                                   SECUFUTIES  COh&MISSIONER,   
                           STATE  OF  NEVADA,
                           STATE  OF  NORTH  CAROLINA,                                             
9-JBR-RLH
                           COMMONWEALTH                                                 OF 
                           STATE  GF  SOUTH  CAROLINA,

                                              PlaintifFs,  .                                       
                                                                                        V.         
                                                                                                   
                      EQUINGX  INTERNATIONAL                                                     
                      ADVANCED  MIAlRKETlNG  SEMINARS,  INC.,  )
                      BG  EN?ERPTUSES,  INC.,  and                                                 
                      WILLIAM  GOULDD,                                                             

                                            Defendants,
                                                              Lr-
                                                              I? @=XWHWj  TEMPORARY  RESTRAINING 
                                                                                FREEZING  ASSETS, 
SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES DlSTRICT COURT
  • a-l%DERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
  • STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,
  • OF PENNSYLVANIA,
  • ADVANCED MIAlRKETlNG SEMINARS, INC.,)
  • FREEZING ASSETS, APPOINTING
  • the Federal Trade Commission having filed its complaint for a
  • a temporary restraining order and for an order to show cause why a preliminary injunction
  • 2, There is good cause to believe that the defendants, Equinox International Corp.,
  • Advnnced Marketing Seminars, Inc., BG Management, Inc., and William Gouldd, have engaged
  • and that the plaintiff is therefore likely to prevail on the merits of this action;
  • There is good cause for the Court to appoint a temporary receiver;
  • "Defendants" means Equinox International Corp., Advanced Marketing Seminars, Inc.,
  • "Marketing Program" includes, but is not limited to, any multi-level marketing, sales,
  • enjoined from failing to disclose, clearly and conspicuously, before any consumer pays to
  • The number and percentage of current Marketing Program Participants who have
  • receiver, for Equinox and of all the funds, prop&es, premises, accounts and other assets
  • Assume full control of Equinox by removing Defendant William Gouldd and any other
  • Collect, marshal, and take custody, control and possession of all the funds, property,
  • assets, in order to preveot any irreparable loss, damage and injury to business venture
  • prior to the Preliminary Injunction Hearing.
  • deponent and expedited interrogatories, requests for admission, or requests for production
  • records of wire transfers, and check registers) appointment books, copies of federal, state
  • plaintiffs representatives, agents, and assistants immediate access to the defendants'
  • Commission shall rctum materials so removed within three business days of completing said
  • Defendants, or has held, controlled or maintained custody of any such account or asset at any

  • 3 . LETTER AGREEMENT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    TRUST
    CASH
    COSTS
    EXPENSES
    TAXES
    FEES
    NATURE WHATSOEVER
    RECEIVER
    TRUST YIELDS
    AMOUNT
    PROCEEDS
    AGREEMENT
    PLAINTIFFS
    BILL GOULDD
    ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING
    CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
    SETTING FAIRNESS HEARING
    HOMES
    MANAGEMENT
    PARTIES
    REDUCING
    EMPLOYEES
    HEREAFTER
    OWNERSHIP
    CONTROL
    MAXIMUM AMOUNT
    RECEIVERSHIP ESTATE
    EXCESS
    REQUEST
    
                                                                                             .
    
                                                     LETTER  AGREEMENT
    
       Re:           FTC,  et al, v. Equinox  International  Corporadon,  et all,                      
                     CV-S-99-0969~JBR-RLH                                                              
                                                                                                   0"  
                                                                                                  
                     This  Agreement  sets forth  the  understanding  between  the Plaintiffs  and the 
       the one  hand,  and Defendant  Bill  Gouldd  on the  other  hand, with  respect to  the  agreed 
       return  of  capital to  Gouldd  pursuant  to  the  terms set forth  in the  Order  Preliminarily
       Stipulated  Final  Judgment  and  Class Action  Settlement  and  Setting  Fairness Hearing  in 
       referenced  matter.  Government  plaintiffs  have  authorized  David  C. Fix to  sign  this
      behalf
    
                     It  is agreed  that  in  addition  to  the two  Florida  homes, reasonable 
      such homes (no  single  furnishing  to  exceed  $5,000  in value),  one  1997  Range  Rover, 
      in  Sand Hill  Capital,  one  wristwatch  not to  exceed  approximately  $11,000  in  value, 
      clothing  and other  personal  effects  not  to  exceed  $50,000  in  value,  Gouldd  will 
      hundred  percent  of  any interest  attributable  to  Bill  Gouldd  in the  IRC  $419A(f)(6) 
      Benefit  Trust  established  by and  for  the  benefit  of  the  employees  of  BG  Management, 
      (hereafter  "5  419  Trust")  up  to  a limit  of  $8000,000  cash net of  all costs, expenses,
      fees of  every  type  and  nature  whatsoever.  It  is understood  by the  parties  to  this
      immediately  after  the  Receiver  takes ownership  and  control  of  BG  Management,  Inc. the 
      Trust  will  be reduced  to  cash, and.that  Gouldd  is entitled  to  receive  when  that  event 
      of  $8,000,000  cash net of  all  costs, expenses, taxes and fees of  every  type  and  nature 
      that are  incurred  as a result  of  reducing  the  $419  Trust  to  cash.  The  Receiver  and
      that the  Receiver  shall  take  all reasonable  steps necessary to  insure  that the  4 419 
    ~-;- maximum  amount  of  cash.  In  the  event  that  the  $419  Trust  yields  less than 
      Gouldd  net of  all costs, expenses, taxes, and  fees of  every  type  and `nature  whatsoever, 
      agree  that the Receiver  shall return  additional  capital  to  Gouldd,  as soon  as
      Gouldd  receives  $8,000,000  cash net of  all costs, expenses, taxes and fees of  every  type 
      nature  whatsoever.  If  reducing  the  5 419  Trust  to  cash yields more  than  $8,000,000 
      Gouldd  net of  all costs, expenses, taxes and fees of  every  type  and  nature  whatsoever,  the
      Receivership  estate will  receive  any such amount  in  excess of  $8,000,000.
    
                     At  Gouldd's  request,  the  Receiver  shall advance  to  Gouldd  against the 
      4 419  Trust  $200,000  within  seventy-two  (72)  hours  of  Gouldd's  compliance  with 
      VII1.A  of  the  Order  Preliminarily  Approving  Stipulated  Final  Judgement  and  Class Action
      Settlement  and  Setting  Fairness  Hearing,  and an additional  $200,000  per  month  until 
      receives  the proceeds  from  the  cashing  out  of  the  5 4 19 Trust.  The  amount  of  any
      be deducted  from  the  $8,000,000  payment  net of  all costs, expenses, taxes, and  fees of 
      and nature  whatsoever  that  Gouldd  is to  receive  as set forth  above.
    
               -        -          .-                                             -,  ,.
    
    
    
               Job  `e B. Rawlinson
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • This Agreement sets forth the understanding between the Plaintiffs and the Intervenors, on
  • It is agreed that in addition to the two Florida homes, reasonable household fi.unishings in Inc. (hereafter "5 419 Trust") up to a limit of $8000,000 cash net of all costs, expenses, taxes,
  • It is understood by the parties to this agreement that immediately after the Receiver takes
  • The Receiver and Gouldd agree that the Receiver shall take all reasonable steps necessary to
  • If reducing the 5 419 Trust to cash yields more than $8,000,000 cash to Gouldd net of all
  • At Gouldd's request, the Receiver shall advance to Gouldd against the proceeds from the 4 419

  • 4 . COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    MARYLAND SECURITIES
    PLAINTIFF
    SOUTH CAROLINA
    PRACTICES
    VIOLATION
    NEVADA
    TRADE
    RELIEF
    UNFAIR
    MARYLAND SECURITIES COMMISSIONER
    EQUINOX PROGRAM
    HAWAII
    PENNSYLVANIA
    FTC ACT
    EQUITABLE RELIEF
    DISTRIBUTORS
    ADVANCED MARKETING SEMINARS
    COMMONWEALTH
    PERMANENT INJUNCTION
    FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
    PRELIMINARY RELIEF
    HAWAII UNIFORM
    CONSUMER PROTECTION LAW
    CHAIN SCHEMES ACT
    MATERIAL FACTS
    NORTH CAROLINA PYRAMID
    PARAGRAPHS
    STATE LAW CLAIMS
    
         DEBRA A. VALENTINE, General Counsel         KATHRYN E. LANDRETH
         David C. Fix                                U.S. Attorney, District of Nevada
         Frank M. Gorman                             BLAINE T. WELSH
         Gary L. Ivens                               Assistant United States Attorney
         FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION                    701 E. Bridger Ave., Ste. 800
         600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Rm. 238          Las Vegas, NV 89101
         Washington, DC  20580                       (702) 388-6336
         202-326-3298, 202-326-3282, 202-326-2330
         202-326-3395 facsimile
    
                                   UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                       DISTRICT OF NEVADA
    
    
                                                     )
    FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,                        )
    STATE OF HAWAII,                                 )
    MARYLAND SECURITIES COMMISSIONER, )
    STATE OF NEVADA,                                 )   CIVIL ACTION NO:
    STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,                         )
    COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,                    )
    STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,                         ))
              Plaintiffs,                            ))
                             v.                      ))
    EQUINOX INTERNATIONAL CORP.,                     )
    ADVANCED MARKETING SEMINARS, INC., )
    BG MANAGEMENT, INC., and                         )
    WILLIAM GOULDD,                                  ))
             Defendants.                             ))
    
         COMPLAINT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF
    
    
    
    MELANIE SENTER LUBIN                       BENJAMIN CAYETANO, Governor
    Maryland Securities Commissioner           State of Hawaii
    Dale E. Cantone                            Ryan S. Ushijima
    Lucy Cardwell                              Commissioner of Securities
    Assistant Attorneys General                Dean A. Soma, Attorney
    Office of the Attorney General             Securities Enforcement Unit
    200 Saint Paul Place                       250 South King Street, Suite 400
    Baltimore, MD 21202-2020                   Honolulu, HI  96813
    (410) 576-6368                             (808) 586-2740
                                               (808) 586-3977 facsimile
    FRANKIE SUE DEL PAPA
    Attorney General of Nevada                 MICHAEL F. EASLEY
    Tracey Brierly                             Attorney General of North Carolina
    Deputy Attorney General                    Christine Lanning
    Nevada Attorney General's Office           Assistant Attorney General
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • MARYLAND SECURITIES COMMISSIONER,)
  • COMPLAINT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF
  • the Securities Commissioner of the State of Maryland, the State of Nevada, the State of North
  • Carolina, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and the State of South Carolina, by their
  • The FTC brings this action under Section 13of the Federal Trade Commission Act
  • equitable relief against defendants for their unfair or deceptive acts or practices in
  • Section 5of the FTC Act,
  • The State of Hawaii brings this action under the Hawaii Uniform Securities Act,
  • Chapter 485, to secure injunctive relief, equitable relief, and civil penalties against
  • The Maryland Securities Commissioner, Office of the Attorney General, brings this
  • injunction, preliminary relief, other equitable relief, and statutory monetary penalties
  • practices, securities law violations, and false advertising in violation of NRS §§ 598.0915,
  • North Carolina Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act,
  • acts or practices in violation of the Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law,
  • The State of South Carolina, Office of the Secretary of State, brings this action, under
  • Plaintiff State of Hawaii is one of the fifty sovereign states of the United States.
  • Trade Practices Act and under the North Carolina Pyramid and Chain Schemes Act.
  • Defendant Advanced Marketing Seminars, Inc. is a Nevada corporation
  • seminars for distributors and prospective recruits.
  • that they can begin recruiting other people to join the Equinox program.
  • As alleged in paragraphs 1 through 38, the Equinox program is an inherently unlawful
  • Defendants made untrue statements of material facts or omitted to state material facts
  • plaintiff, the State of Hawaii, to enforce its state law claims under the Hawaii Uniform

  • 5 . ORDER PRELIM APPROVING STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    COURT
    RECEIVERSHIP
    ASSETS
    GOULDD
    PLAINTIFFS
    EQUINOX
    RECEIVER
    MARKETING
    PROVISIONS
    RECEIVERSHIP ENTITIES
    FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
    PERMANENT
    BILL GOULDD
    FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
    FTC
    EMPLOYEES
    CORPORATE DEFENDANTS
    NORTH CAROLINA
    EQUITABLE RELIEF
    PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
    MANAGEMENT
    MARKETING PROGRAM
    DISTRIBUTION
    PENNSYLVANIA
    GOVERNMENT
    ADVANCED MARKETING SEMINARS
    CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
    SUBSECTION
    ATTORNEYS
    
                                    IN  THE  UNITED  STATES  DISTRJCT  COURT
                                         FOR  THE  DISTRICT  OF NEVADA
    
                                                                        >
    FEDERAL  TRADE  COMMISSION,  @ al.,                                 >
                                                                        >
                                        PlaiIltifKS,                    >
                             V.                                         )
    
                                                                        >
    EQUlNOX  INTERNATIONAL                CORPORATION,  &al.,           )
                                                                        )
                                        Defendants.                     >                              
                                                                        1  CV-S-99-0969-JBR-RLH
                                                                        >
    GLENN  LOWRANCE,  ANNETTE  REAGQR,                                  1  ORDERPREUMINUULY
    ANNEKEHLER,MARTINKl3LERand                                          >  APPROVING  STIPULATED
    LISA  FUOG,                                                         >  FINALJ-UDGMENTAND
                                                                        >  CLASS  ACTION
                                        Intexvenors,                    >  SEl-TLEMENTANDSEmG
                             V.                                         1     FAIRNESSHEARING
                                                                        >
    BXLL  GOULDD,  & aJ.,                                               >
                                                                        >
                                        Defendants.                     >
                                                                        >
    
    
                     PlaintifTs  Federal  Trade  Commission  ("FTC"  or  "Commission")  and the  States
    
    Hawaii,  Maryland,  Nevada,  North  Carolina,  Pennsylvania  and  South  Carolina  commenced  this
    
    action  on  August  3,  1999, with  the  sling  of  a Complaint  for  Permanent  Injunction  and 
    
    Equitable  Relief  and  an Ex Pmte  Application  for  a Temporary  Restraining  Order  ("TRO")  and
    
    Other  Equitable  Relief.  The  Court  entered  a TRO  with  asset freeze  and receivership 
    
    on  August  5,  1999.  On  September  14, 1999  following  a three-day  he-           the  Court 
    
    order  partially  granting  the Plaintiffs'  Motion  for  a Preliminary  Injunction.  South 
    
    withdrew  from  the  action  in November  1999.  On  November  19, 1999,  the FTC  and the
    
    
    
    remaining  , state plainti&  joined  by the  states of  Michigan  Tennessee  and  Viiginia 
    
    "Government  Plaintif&"),  fled  their  First  Amended  Complaint  for  Permanent  Injunction  and
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Hawaii, Maryland, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and South Carolina commenced this
  • action on August 3, 1999, with the sling of a Complaint for Permanent Injunction and Other
  • Other Equitable Relief.
  • The Court entered a TRO with asset freeze and receivership provisions
  • order partially granting the Plaintiffs' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction.
  • On November 19, 1999, the FTC and the
  • The First Amended Complaint charges Defendants Equinox International
  • Corporation, Advanced Marketing Seminars, Inc., BG Management, Inc.
  • 1999), and the Maryland Multilevel Distribution Companies Law, Md.
  • Martin Kehler and Lisa Fuog filed a class action against Bill Gouldd, Equinox, AMS, and Marc
  • Accetta in the district court of Lubbock County, Texas, alleging claims under
  • Government PlainWs and Interveners,
  • Judgment and Class Action Settlement, to schedule a fairness hearing on the Stipulated Final
  • Defendants further acknowledge that they have read the provisions of this Order and are
  • Receiver and their afZiliates, aBiliated companies, subsidiaries, employees, servants,
  • afliliated companies, subsidiaries, employees, servants, officers, directors, agents,
  • Federal Trade Commission, et al., vs. Equinox International Corporation, et al., Case No,
  • "Corporate Defendants" means Equinox International
  • "Multi-level marketing program" means any marketing program in which
  • right or claim to, including all assets held by any Related Entities as defined in Subsection
  • Except as set forth in Subsection VIIIB below,
  • sums of money now or hereafter due or owing to the Receivership Entities,
  •    |