LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v REVCON, INCORPORATED Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 34-39298, Defendant: Revcon, Incorporated, Plaintiff: SEC, State: WA Washington, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>34-39298, Revcon, Occ, Clearing, Membership, Review, Exchange Act, Margin, Clearing Agency, Membership Standards, Securities Exchange Act, Clearing Member, Committee, Commission, Papadopoulos, Margin Deposit, Registered Clearing Agency, Occ Staff, Recommendation, Compliance, Clearing Fund, Clearing Fund Contribution, Review Proceeding, Options Clearing Corporation, Responsibilities, Risk Management, On-site Examination, Disapprove, Appearances, Margin System, Written Recommendation , ContentID: 120247249

Case Documents
1 1997-11-05 SEC COMMISSION OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 117399
24 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 24 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC COMMISSION OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
OCC
CLEARING
MEMBERSHIP
REVIEW
EXCHANGE ACT
MARGIN
CLEARING AGENCY
MEMBERSHIP STANDARDS
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
CLEARING MEMBER
COMMITTEE
COMMISSION
PAPADOPOULOS
MARGIN DEPOSIT
REGISTERED CLEARING AGENCY
OCC STAFF
RECOMMENDATION
COMPLIANCE
CLEARING FUND
CLEARING FUND CONTRIBUTION
REVIEW PROCEEDING
OPTIONS CLEARING CORPORATION
RESPONSIBILITIES
RISK MANAGEMENT
ON-SITE EXAMINATION
DISAPPROVE
APPEARANCES
MARGIN SYSTEM
WRITTEN RECOMMENDATION





                          SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                                   Washington, D.C.

     SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
     Rel. No. 39298 / November 5, 1997

     Admin. Proc. File No. 3-9076
     ____________________________________________________
                                                         :
          In the Matter of the Application of            :
                                                         :
                   REVCON, INCORPORATED                  :
                    111 El Brillo Way                    :
                   Palm Beach, FL  33480                 :
                                                         :
             For Review of Action Taken by               :
                                                         :
            THE OPTIONS CLEARING CORPORATION             :
     ____________________________________________________:

     OPINION OF THE COMMISSION

          REGISTERED CLEARING AGENCY -- REVIEW OF DENIAL OF MEMBERSHIP

               Membership Standards

                    Failure to Meet Conditions to Membership

          Registered clearing agency denied broker-dealer's application
for
          membership because broker-dealer failed to comply with
conditions
          imposed for membership.  Held, review proceeding is dismissed.

     APPEARANCES:

          Howard M. Rudolph, of Weiss & Handler, P.A., for Revcon,
Incorporated.

          Paul E. Dengel and Janet Angstadt, of Schiff Hardin & Waite, for
The
     Options Clearing Corporation.

SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • REGISTERED CLEARING AGENCY -- REVIEW OF DENIAL OF MEMBERSHIP
  • Registered clearing agency denied broker-dealer's application for membership because
  • Held, review proceeding is dismissed.
  • APPEARANCES:
  • Revcon Incorporated,
  • appeals from the decision of The Options Clearing Corporation denying its application for
  • The OCC found that Revcon was not in compliance with certain requirements imposed as a
  • Papadopoulos was responsible for oversight of all trading decisions, position balancing, and
  • On June 6, 1995, in order to become a self-clearing firm, Revcon filed an application for
  • For the next year, in connection with its authority and responsibilities as a registered
  • the OCC sought information from Revcon demonstrating that the Firm could discharge its
  • During this period, the OCC attempted to obtain from Revcon, among other things, financial
  • Revcon pressed the OCC staff to present the Firm's application for membership to the Me
  • the Committee stated that it did not have the benefit of an on-site examination and therefore
  • funding requirements on days when the margin
  • provide financial reports reflecting compliance with all membership standards for the three
  • The Committee lastly recommended that, if Revcon did not comply with the specified conditions
  • On receipt of the Committee's recommendation, the Chairman advised that, if Revcon became a
  • Revcon asserts, without basis, that it complied with all of the OCC's conditions to
  • Revcon asserts that the Firm should have been required to make an initial clearing fund
  • "a clearing agency's margin system.
  • This Commission, as part of its regulatory oversight responsibilities, has reviewed and
  • If the Committee proposes to recommend to the Board that an application for clearing
  •    |