LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v JAMES A. GOETZ Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 34-39796, Defendant: James A. Goetz, Plaintiff: SEC, State: WA Washington, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>34-39796, Goetz, Tuition, Securities, School, Funds, Nasd, Matching Gifts, Donation, Violation, Applications, Commission, Donate, Account, High School, Amount, Trinity, Committee, Securities Exchange Act, Matter, Sustain, Sanctions, Disciplinary Action, National Association, Colleague, Respondent, Payment, Credit, Scholarship , ContentID: 120247237

Case Documents
1 1998-03-25 SEC COMMISSION OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 117387
9 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 9 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC COMMISSION OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
TUITION
SECURITIES
SCHOOL
FUNDS
NASD
MATCHING GIFTS
DONATION
VIOLATION
APPLICATIONS
COMMISSION
DONATE
ACCOUNT
HIGH SCHOOL
AMOUNT
TRINITY
COMMITTEE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
MATTER
MEMBER
SUSTAIN
SANCTIONS
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
COLLEAGUE
RESPONDENT
PAYMENT
CREDIT
BUSINESS
SCHOLARSHIP


                          SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                                   Washington, D.C.


          SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
          Rel. No. 39796 / March 25, 1998

          Admin. Proc. File No. 3-9206
          _________________________________________________
                                                           :
                 In the Matter of the Application of       :
                                                           :
                         JAMES A. GOETZ                    :
                         983 12th Avenue                   :
                       Dickinson, ND  58601                :
                                                           :
          For Review of Disciplinary Action Taken by the   :
                                                           :
          NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECURITIES DEALERS, INC. :
          _________________________________________________:

          OPINION OF THE COMMISSION

REGISTERED SECURITIES ASSOCIATION -- REVIEW OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

          Violations of Rules of Fair Practice

          Conduct Inconsistent with Just and Equitable
          Principles of Trade

Associated person of member firms obtained $1,600, as a donation for his
daughter's private high school, through his member firm's matching gifts
program, by misrepresenting that he had contributed, as required, personal
funds in that same amount.  Representative also knowingly received a
tuition offset in return for the matching gift, in further violation of the
terms of the firm's program.  Held, association's finding of violations
sustained, but sanctions imposed modified.


          APPEARANCES:

          Daniel J. Chapman, of Chapman & Chapman, P.C.,
          for James A. Goetz.

          Norman Sue, Jr. and Vickie R. Olafson, for NASD Regulation, Inc.

SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  • Associated person of member firms obtained $1,600, as a donation for his daughter's private
  • Representative also knowingly received a tuition offset in return for the matching gift, in
  • Held, association's finding of violations sustained, but sanctions imposed modified.
  • James A. Goetz, formerly an investment company and variable contract products representative
  • Corporation, members of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. ("NASD"),
  • The NASD also found that Goetz knew or should have known that the funds contributed by the
  • Goetz stated that he first learned about the Program through another Prudential employee,
  • Goetz submitted four separate applications to the Program.
  • This gift, is made from my personal funds or property, fully qualifies as a charitable
  • Moreover, the record supports the NASD's additional finding that Goetz benefited personally
  • While Goetz admits that he did not donate personal funds or property, he nonetheless insists
  • When questioned initially about the matter by a Prudential investigator, Goetz did not advise
  • Moreover, the application form specifies that a donation made other than by cash, check, or
  • Goetz acknowledges that he was aware that his daughter's tuition was being paid out of a
  • Goetz's misconduct here -- disregarding his employer's foundation's fundamental rules for
  • However, we view the bar imposed by the National Business Conduct Committee, to which Goetz
  • We sustain the additional sanctions imposed as neither excessive nor oppressive.
  • The District Committee found that, "ven if had characterized the Program as alleged by
  •    |