LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v RICHARD T. SULLIVAN Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 34-40671, Defendant: Richard T. Sullivan, Plaintiff: SEC, State: WA Washington, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>34-40671, Sullivan, Reconsideration, Nasd, Exchange Act, Proceeding, Securities Dealers, Costs, National Association, Revocation, Review, Appeals, Pay, Determination, Basis, Commission, Bankruptcy Judge, Member Firm, Fnw, Settlement, Registered Securities Association, Compliance, Supervisory Capacity, Petrantis, Nasd Staff, Nasd Disciplinary Proceedings, Bankruptcy Court, Explanation, Suspension, National Committee , ContentID: 120247207

Case Documents
1 1998-11-12 SEC COMMISSION OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 117357
12 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 12 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC COMMISSION OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
RECONSIDERATION
NASD
EXCHANGE ACT
PROCEEDING
SECURITIES DEALERS
COSTS
MEMBER
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
REVOCATION
REVIEW
APPEALS
PAY
DETERMINATION
BASIS
COMMISSION
BANKRUPTCY JUDGE
MEMBER FIRM
FNW
SETTLEMENT
REGISTERED SECURITIES ASSOCIATION
COMPLIANCE
SUPERVISORY CAPACITY
PETRANTIS
NASD STAFF
NASD DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
BANKRUPTCY COURT
EXPLANATION
SUSPENSION
NATIONAL COMMITTEE
                          SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                                   Washington, D.C.



          SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
          Rel. No. 40671 / November 12, 1998

          Admin. Proc. File No. 3-9324


                                                           :
                In the Matter of the Application of        :
                                                           :
                       RICHARD T. SULLIVAN                 :
                     307 Clinton B Fiske Avenue            :
                      Staten Island NY 10314               :
                                                           :
          For Review of Action Taken by the                :
                                                           :
          NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECURITIES DEALERS, INC. :
                                                           :

          OPINION OF THE COMMISSION

               REGISTERED SECURITIES ASSOCIATION -- REVIEW OF PROCEEDINGS

                    Practice and Procedure

                    Need for Further Explanation of Basis for Association
                    Action

               Where registered securities association determined not to
               reconsider revocation for failure to pay fine and costs of
               former principal of member firm, held, appropriate for the
               Commission to seek explanation from association of its
               determination, and proceedings remanded to association for
               that purpose.


          APPEARANCES:

               Michael Q. Carey, Carey & Associates, for Richard T.
          Sullivan.

               Alden S. Adkins and Norman Sue, Jr., for the National
          Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.

          Appeal filed:  April 24, 1997
SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • REGISTERED SECURITIES ASSOCIATION -- REVIEW OF PROCEEDINGS
  • Need for Further Explanation of Basis for Association
  • Michael Q. Carey, Carey & Associates, for Richard T. Sullivan.
  • Alden S. Adkins and Norman Sue, Jr., for the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
  • Richard T. Sullivan, a former principal and compliance director of F.N. Wolf & Co., Inc.,
  • Pursuant to its Sanctions Rule 8320, the NASD revoked Sullivan's registration in all
  • We found that FNW, acting through, among others, Sullivan, had engaged in transactions in
  • We further found that Sullivan had failed to establish, enforce, and maintain adequate
  • We will refer to this proceeding as "Treats I." Sullivan appealed Treats I to the United
  • The NASD censured Sullivan, suspended him for one year to run concurrently with the
  • On October 23, 1996, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York
  • counsel for Sullivan contacted certain members of the NASD's staff and asked that the NASD
  • The NASD staff informed counsel that collection of the Treats I fine and costs would continue
  • On January 29, 1997, Sullivan's counsel wrote to the NASD requesting reconsideration of the
  • We have found that we have jurisdiction to review NASD actions that effectively bar the
  • the Bankruptcy Court ruled that the automatic stay provisions of the Bankruptcy Code did not
  • Moreover, in a December 1996 hearing before the Bankruptcy Judge, in response to a motion to
  • :The Division's response before the National Committee
  •    |