LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v JOHN A. CHEPAK Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 34-42356, Defendant: John A. Chepak, Plaintiff: SEC, State: DC Washington D.C., UniqueCaseRef: SEC>34-42356, Chepak, Supervisory, Compliance, Supervisory Procedures, Nasd, Securities, Violations, Reasonableness, Thomas James, Commission, Mcmorrow, Failure, Sanctions, Trading, Review, National Association, Disciplinary Action, Regulations, Securities Exchange Act, Enforce Supervisory Procedures, Responsibilities, Recommendations, Singer Frumento, Securities Dealers, Compliance Officer, Principals, Washington, Llp, General Securities, Sales Practices , ContentID: 120247168

Case Documents
1 2000-01-24 SEC COMMISSION OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 117318
13 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 13 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC COMMISSION OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SUPERVISORY
COMPLIANCE
SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES
NASD
SECURITIES
VIOLATIONS
REASONABLENESS
THOMAS JAMES
COMMISSION
MCMORROW
FAILURE
SANCTIONS
TRADING
REVIEW
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
REGULATIONS
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
ENFORCE SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES
RESPONSIBILITIES
RECOMMENDATIONS
SINGER FRUMENTO
SECURITIES DEALERS
COMPLIANCE OFFICER
PRINCIPALS
WASHINGTON
LLP
GENERAL SECURITIES
SALES PRACTICES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington D.C.

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Rel. No. 42356 / January 24, 2000

   Admin. Proc. File No. 3-9684

   In the Matter of the Application of

   John A. Chepak
   c/o Jenice L. Malecki, Esq.
   Singer Frumento, LLP
   40 Exchange Place, 20th Floor
   New York, New York 10005

   For Review of Disciplinary Action taken by the

   National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.

Opinion of the Commission

Registered Securities Association -
Review of Disciplinary Proceedings

Violation of Conduct Rules

   Failure to Establish, Maintain, and Enforce Supervisory Procedures

   Compliance officer failed to establish, maintain, and enforce
   supervisory procedures reasonably designed to achieve compliance with
   applicable NASD Rules. , association's findings of violation and
   assessment of sanctions

Appearances

   Audra A. Acquavella and Bill T. Singer, of Singer Frumento, LLP, for
   John A. Chepak.

   Shirley H. Weiss, for NASD Regulation, Inc.

   Appeal filed

   August 24, 1998

   Last brief filed

   November 19, 1998
SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • Washington D.C.
  • John A. Chepak c/o Jenice L. Malecki,
  • Singer Frumento, LLP
  • Registered Securities Association Review of Disciplinary Proceedings
  • Compliance officer failed to establish, maintain, and enforce supervisory procedures
  • Audra A. Acquavella and Bill T. Singer, of Singer Frumento, LLP, for John A. Chepak.
  • John A. Chepak, a former registered general securities representative, general securities
  • This appeal involves Chepak's actions when he was Director of Compliance at Thomas James.
  • At issue are whether Chepak, who was responsible for establishing and maintaining the firm's
  • In the spring of 1990, before Chepak joined Thomas James, the Commission filed an action
  • The Compliance Department's responsibilities at Thomas James were extensive, including the
  • The Supervisory Manual also failed to establish mechanisms to identify violations of these
  • Thus, NASD Conduct Rule 3010 requires member firms to establish, maintain, and enforce a
  • NASD Rule 3010requires member firms to designate appropriately registered principals to carry
  • Yesawich retained Philip McMorrow as his "oversight consultant" to provide technical
  • Chepak, nonetheless, claims that he reasonably believed that McMorrow instructed him not to
  • Chepak cites two cases that he asserts make clear that recommendations by court-appointed
  • Chepak believes that the sanctions assessed against him are "erroneous, excessive, arbitrary,
  • In accordance with Section 19of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we must determine if the
  • Moreover, despite his praise of Chepak, McMorrow also questioned the reasonableness of
  •    |