LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v MICHAEL J. MARKOWSKI and JOSEPH F. RICCIO Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 34-43259, Defendant: Michael J. Markowski and Joseph F. Riccio, Plaintiff: SEC, State: WA Washington, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>34-43259, Markowski, Securities, Nasd, Firm, Non-bona Fide Bid, Disciplinary Action, Restriction Agreement, Manipulation, Market, Securities Dealers, Violation, Mountaintop, Commission, Exchange Act, National Association, Investigative Interview, Findings, Fide Bid Quotations, Responsibility, Sanctions, Applicants, Underwriting, Published Non-bona Fide, Common Stock, Accordingly Sustain, Palm Harbor, Registered Securities, Cooperate, President , ContentID: 120247161

Case Documents
1 2000-09-07 SEC COMMISSION OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 117311
10 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 10 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC COMMISSION OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SECURITIES
NASD
FIRM
NON-BONA FIDE BID
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
RESTRICTION AGREEMENT
MANIPULATION
MARKET
SECURITIES DEALERS
VIOLATION
MOUNTAINTOP
COMMISSION
MEMBER
EXCHANGE ACT
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
INVESTIGATIVE INTERVIEW
FINDINGS
FIDE BID QUOTATIONS
RESPONSIBILITY
SANCTIONS
APPLICANTS
UNDERWRITING
PUBLISHED NON-BONA FIDE
COMMON STOCK
ACCORDINGLY SUSTAIN
PALM HARBOR
REGISTERED SECURITIES
COOPERATE
PRESIDENT
>SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.

   SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   Rel. No. 43259 / September 7, 2000

   Adm. Proc. File No. 3-9671

                    In the Matter of the Application of

                            MICHAEL J. MARKOWSKI
                            1521 Alton Road #233
                         Miami Beach, Florida 33139

                                    and

                              JOSEPH F. RICCIO
                            2654 Oleander Court
                         Palm Harbor, Florida 34684

               For Review of Disciplinary Action Taken by the

              NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECURITIES DEALERS, INC.

OPINION OF THE COMMISSION

       REGISTERED SECURITIES ASSOCIATION -- REVIEW OF DISCIPLINARY ACTION

   Violations of Exchange Act and Conduct Rules

   Manipulation
       Non-bona fide Bid Quotations
       Violation of Restriction Agreement
       Failure to Cooperate

   President of NASD member firm and its trader manipulated the market
   for securities underwritten by firm, and published non-bona fide bids
   for those securities. In addition, president was responsible for
   firm's violation of its restriction agreement with the NASD, and
   refused to submit to an NASD investigative interview. Held,
   association's findings of violation and the sanctions it imposed
   sustained.

   APPEARANCES
   William VanDercreek and W. Scott Newbern, for Michael J. Markowski and
       Joseph F. Riccio.
       Alden S. Adkins, Susan L. Beesley, and Deborah F. McIlroy, for
       NASD Regulation, Inc.
SNIPPETS:
  • >SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • Palm Harbor, Florida 34684
  • OPINION OF THE COMMISSION
  • REGISTERED SECURITIES ASSOCIATION -- REVIEW OF DISCIPLINARY ACTION
  • Violations of Exchange Act and Conduct Rules
  • Manipulation Non-bona fide Bid Quotations Violation of Restriction Agreement Failure to
  • President of NASD member firm and its trader manipulated the market for securities
  • In addition, president was responsible for firm's violation of its restriction agreement with
  • association's findings of violation and the sanctions it imposed sustained.
  • William VanDercreek and W. Scott Newbern, for Michael J. Markowski and Joseph F. Riccio.
  • Michael J. Markowski, who was chairman, chief executive officer, and majority shareholder of
  • The NASD found that applicants violated Section 10of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
  • Each Class A warrant entitled the holder to purchase one share of common stock and one Class
  • The brochure touts Global as "a full-service investment banker" with a program for the
  • We accordingly sustain the NASD's findings of violation.
  • Assuming that "monitoring responsibility" was delegated to Shanley, Markowski was clearly on
  • Applicants argue that, if the charges against them are not dismissed, their sanctions should
  • We further note that this is the second time that Markowski has been disciplined for refusing
  • ORDER SUSTAINING DISCIPLINARY ACTION TAKEN BY REGISTERED SECURITIES ASSOCIATION
  •    |