LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v KENT T. BLACK, JOEL L. HURST, DAVID E. LYNCH, et al Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 33-8033, Defendant: Kent T. Black, Joel L. Hurst, David E. Lynch, Larry E. Muller, and Robert L. McCook Release No.: 34-45052, Plaintiff: SEC, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>33-8033, Lynch, Securities, Respondent Lynch, Exchange Act, Broker-dealer, Remedial Sanctions, Transactions, Violations, Cease, Parking, Civil Money Penalty, Parking Scheme, Dealer, Disgorgement, Proceeding, Oip, Firm, Motion, David, Houston Office, Division Requests, Tickets, Bonds, Amount, Imposing, Pursuant, Books, Trades, Inaccurate, Thereunder , ContentID: 120246950

Case Documents
1 2001-11-14 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 117100
6 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 6 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SECURITIES
RESPONDENT LYNCH
EXCHANGE ACT
BROKER-DEALER
REMEDIAL SANCTIONS
TRANSACTIONS
VIOLATIONS
CEASE
PARKING
CIVIL MONEY PENALTY
PARKING SCHEME
DEALER
DISGORGEMENT
PROCEEDING
OIP
FIRM
MOTION
DAVID
HOUSTON OFFICE
DIVISION REQUESTS
TICKETS
BONDS
AMOUNT
IMPOSING
PURSUANT
BOOKS
TRADES
INACCURATE
THEREUNDER
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
Release No. 8033 / November 14, 2001

   SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   Release No. 45052 / November 14, 2001

   ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
   File No. 3-9440
     _________________________________________________________________

   In the Matter of

   KENT T. BLACK,
   JOEL L. HURST,
   DAVID E. LYNCH,
   LARRY E. MULLER,
   and ROBERT L. MCCOOK
     _________________________________________________________________

   ORDER MAKING FINDINGS AND
   IMPOSING SANCTIONS BY DEFAULT
   AGAINST DAVID E. LYNCH

   This proceeding was initiated by the Securities and Exchange
   Commission ("Commission") with an Order Instituting Administrative
   Proceedings ("OIP") Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of
   1933 ("Securities Act") and Sections 15(b), 19(h), and 21C of the
   Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") on September 26,
   1997. A prehearing conference was held on April 23, 1998, five days
   before the scheduled hearing date for Respondents Lynch and McCook. At
   the prehearing conference, counsel for Lynch disclosed Lynch's
   intention to not attend the hearing or defend the proceeding against
   him. Counsel for the Division of Enforcement ("Division") stated that
   the Division would put on a prima facie case against Lynch and move
   for a default. (Transcript of Prehearing Conference of April 23, 1998
   at 98-99.)

   The hearing as to Respondents Lynch and McCook took place on April 28
   through 30, 1998. Neither Lynch nor his counsel appeared at the
   hearing. The Division filed its Motion for an Order Making Findings,
   Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a Cease and Desist Order Against David
   E. Lynch by Default ("Default Motion") on May 14, 1998.

   Pursuant to Rule 155(a) of the Commission's Rules of Practice, 17
SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • ORDER MAKING FINDINGS AND IMPOSING SANCTIONS BY DEFAULT AGAINST DAVID E. LYNCH
  • This proceeding was initiated by the Securities and Exchange Commission with an Order
  • The Division filed its Motion for an Order Making Findings, Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a
  • Pursuant to Rule 155of the Commission's Rules of Practice,
  • The administrative law judge may determine the proceeding against a defaulting party upon
  • The Broker-Dealer's Houston office was opened by (Respondent Lynch and another respondent) in
  • the Houston office had the authority to execute riskless principal transactions.
  • The Broker-Dealer did not allow the Houston office to hold positions in securities unless
  • In order to circumvent the Broker-Dealer's restriction on holding positions, engaged in a
  • From that point forward, whenever wanted to park securities, they entered into an arrangement
  • That dealer would then sell the bonds to firm for a fraction higher than it had purchased
  • Each time executed a parking transaction, they filled out tickets for the sale and the
  • The inaccurate order tickets written in the main office depicted each of the parking
  • As a result of the conduct described above, willfully violated Section 17of the Securities
  • As a result of the conduct described above, willfully aided and abetted violations of
  • The OIP seeks the entry of a cease and desist order pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities
  • In its Default Motion, the Division identifies those remedial sanctions it feels are
  • In its Default Motion, the Division requests that Lynch be ordered to pay a third-tier civil
  •    |