LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v MICHAEL A. FURR RELEASE NO.: 34-45085 Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 33-8037, Defendant: Michael A. Furr Release No.: 34-45085, Plaintiff: SEC, State: CA California, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>33-8037, Furr, Securities, Act, Penny Stock, Exchange Act, Oip, Commission, Reports, Respondent, Electronic Mail, Recommendations, District Court, Participating, Offering, Proceeding, Michael, Findings, Imposing, Allegations, Opposition, Motion, Failing, Practice, California, Wall Street, Misrepresentations, Issuers, Trading, Disclosing , ContentID: 120246939

Case Documents
1 2001-11-20 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 117089
2 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SECURITIES
ACT
PENNY STOCK
EXCHANGE ACT
OIP
COMMISSION
REPORTS
RESPONDENT
ELECTRONIC MAIL
BUSINESS
RECOMMENDATIONS
DISTRICT COURT
PARTICIPATING
OFFERING
PROCEEDING
MICHAEL
FINDINGS
IMPOSING
ALLEGATIONS
OPPOSITION
MOTION
FAILING
PRACTICE
CALIFORNIA
WALL STREET
MISREPRESENTATIONS
ISSUERS
TRADING
DISCLOSING
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
Release No. 8037 / Nov. 20, 2001

   SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   Release No. 45085 / Nov. 20, 2001

   ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
   File No. 3-10581
     _________________________________________________________________

   In the Matter of

   MICHAEL A. FURR
     _________________________________________________________________

   ORDER ENTERING DEFAULT,
   MAKING FINDINGS, AND
   IMPOSING REMEDIAL
   SANCTION

   The Securities and Exchange Commission (Commission or SEC) issued its
   Order Instituting Proceedings (OIP) on September 20, 2001. On October
   17, 2001, the Division of Enforcement (Division) filed a status
   report, stating that Respondent received the OIP at his home address
   on September 29, 2001. As proof of service, the Division attached a
   signed and dated certified mail receipt. Respondent's answer to the
   OIP was due on October 19, 2001, and no answer has been received.

   On October 24, 2001, the Division moved for an order finding
   Respondent in default, deeming the allegations in the OIP to be true,
   and imposing a penny stock bar. The time for filing an opposition to
   that motion has expired, and no opposition has been received.

   Accordingly, Respondent is in default for failing to answer the OIP
   and for failing to respond to a dispositive motion. See Rule 155(a)(2)
   of the Commission's Rules of Practice, 17 C.F.R. § 201.155(a)(2). The
   following allegations in the OIP are deemed to be true

   Michael A. Furr (Furr) resides in California. From at least January
   1999 to January 2000, Furr engaged in the public and investor
   relations business through a variety of entities that he created,
   owned, and controlled, including Wall Street Research Group, Inc., and
   Wall Street Financial Group, Inc.

SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  • ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
  • ORDER ENTERING DEFAULT, MAKING FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTION
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission issued its Order Instituting Proceedings on September
  • On October 17, 2001, the Division of Enforcement filed a status report, stating that
  • On October 24, 2001, the Division moved for an order finding Respondent in default, deeming
  • The time for filing an opposition to that motion has expired, and no opposition has been
  • Respondent is in default for failing to answer the OIP and for failing to respond to a
  • See Rule 155of the Commission's Rules of Practice,
  • Michael A. Furr resides in California.
  • From at least January 1999 to January 2000, Furr engaged in the public and investor relations
  • From January 1999 through January 2000, Furr touted at least twenty-six penny stocks on his
  • Furr included false financial projections and made misrepresentations about the issuers'
  • Furr also engaged in a fraudulent pattern of trading in some of the stocks.
  • The same day as, or within a few days of, issuing reports and electronic mail with buy
  • On September 5, 2000, the Commission filed a civil complaint against Furr in the U.S.
  • Section 10of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder.
  • At the time of the misconduct described above, Furr was participating in an offering of penny
  •    |