LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

PREMIERE TECHNOLOGIES Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: PT114265, CourtName: CLASS ACTION II, State: CA California, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>PT114265, Premiere, Voice-tel, Acquisition, Premiere Technologies, Common Stock, Financials, Exchange Act, Securities, Consolidation, Class Action, Class Period, Exchange, Integration, Sales Force, Management, Jones, Communications Services, Technologies, Individual Defendants, Defendant Jones, Internal Controls, Complaint, Orchestrate, Revenues, Shares, Management Structure, Voice-tel Franchises, Local Access, Allegations, Voice-tel Enterprises, Personal Communications Services , ContentID: 120246848

Case Documents
1 2000-08-25 DOCKET
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 116645
6 pages
PDF
2 1998-06-25 COMPLAINT 1
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 116643
23 pages
PDF
3 1997-02-11 COMPLAINT 2
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 116644
61 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 3 documents , 90 pages
Price: $ 29.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . DOCKET

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
EEX
ENTRY
POWERWAVE TECH
CONSOL
WILLIAM
TANNER
TRANSF
EDWARDS
DISCOVERY
GLT
TAYLOR
DOCKET
SOUTHERN DIVISION
ALFONSO
CORDERO
NAM
DAVID
GEORGE
KEVIN
MICHAELS
RICHARD SHAPERO
EUGENE
GODA
GREGORY
AVIS
BRUCE
JGM
STIP
SPECIFICS


Case docket was last updated on: 08/25/00.


Docket as of August 25, 2000 7:21 pm                          Page 1

Proceedings include all events.                                                   TERMED
CONSOL
8:98cv712 William B Tanner v. Powerwave Tech Inc, et al
(EEx)
                                                                                  TRANSF
                                                                        TERMED
CONSOL
                                                                        (EEx)
TRANSF
                              U.S. District Court
              Central District of California (Southern Div)

                      CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 98-CV-712

William B Tanner v. Powerwave Tech Inc, et al                           Filed:
08/21/98
Assigned to: Judge Gary L. Taylor                    Jury demand: Plaintiff
                 Referred to: Discovery Elgin Edwards
Demand: $0,000                                       Nature of Suit: 850
Lead Docket: 98-CV-605                               Jurisdiction: Federal
Question
Dkt # : is 2:98-cv-06114

Cause: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act


WILLIAM B TANNER, on behalf of           William S Lerach
himself & all others similarly           FAX 619-231-7423
situated                                 [COR LD NTC]
         plaintiff                       Edward P Dietrich
                                         [COR LD NTC]
                                         Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes &
                                         Lerach
                                         600 W Broadway, Ste 1800
                                         San Diego, CA 92101-3356
                                         619-231-1058

                                         Kathleen Ann Herkenhoff
                                         FAX 213-617-9185
                                         [COR LD NTC]
                                         Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes &
SNIPPETS:
  • Case docket was last updated on:
  • CONSOL
  • 8:98cv712 William B Tanner v. Powerwave Tech Inc, et al (EEx)
  • TRANSF
  • Referred to: Discovery Elgin Edwards
  • KEVIN T MICHAELS
  • EUGENE L GODA
  • GREGORY M AVIS
  • BRUCE C EDWARDS
  • POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES INC; ALFONSO G CORDERO; KI Y NAM; DAVID L GEORGE; KEVIN T MICHAELS;
  • Ann I. Jones [Entry date 07/31/98]
  • SACV98-605 GLT
  • transferring case to the SOUTHERN Division.
  • Taylor for all further proceedings.
  • meaning set forth in the stip,
  • w/out effecting the finality of this jgm in any way,
  • interest earned thereon; (see doc for fur specifics); (Ent

  • 2 . COMPLAINT 1

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    COMMON STOCK
    PLAINTIFF
    DEFENDANTS
    EXCHANGE ACT
    ACQUISITION
    CLASS ACTION
    CLASS PERIOD
    DEFENDANT JONES
    SECURITIES
    VOICE-TEL
    COMPLAINT
    INTEGRATION
    REVENUES
    MEMBERS
    SHARES
    MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE
    SALES FORCE
    PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES
    MISREPRESENTATIONS
    INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
    MATERIAL FACTS
    NET INCOME
    MATERIALLY FALSE
    INTEGRATION PROBLEMS
    ENHANCED COMMUNICATIONS
    POOLING EFFECTS
    REPRESENTATIVES
    ACTION PURSUANT
    PROMULGATED THEREUNDER
    
    
    
    
    
                                         UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                    NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
                                              ATLANTA DIVISION
    
    ------------------------------------------------------- x
                                                                  )  Civil Action No. 1 98-CV-1804
    MICHAEL CARISTO. On Behalf of                                 )  [filed Jun. 25, 1998]
    Himself and All Others Similarly Situated,                    )  CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
                          Plaintiff,                              ) )  FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE
               v.                                                 )  FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS
                                                                  )
    PREMIERE TECHNOLOGIES, INC;                                   )
    BOLAND T. JONES; D. GREGORY                                   )
    SMITH; JEFFREY A. ALLRED                                      )
    and PATRICK G. JONES,                                         ) )
                          Defendants.                             )
    ------------------------------------------------------- ) ) x
                                               INTRODUCTION
    Plaintiff, for his class action complaint (the "Complaint") alleges upon information and
    belief(said information and belief being based, in part upon the investigation conducted
    by and through his undersigned attorneys), except as to those paragraphs relating to the
    plaintiff, his purchases of Premiere Technologies, Inc. ("Premiere Technologies" or the
    "Company") common stock, and his suitability to serve as a class representative, which
    are alleged upon personal knowledge, the following:
    
                                          JURISDICTION AND VENUE
    1. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to Section 27
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") 15 U.S.C. § 78aa.
    
    2. The claims asserted herein arise under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act,
    15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b) and 78t(a); and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the Securities
    and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), 17 CFR § 240.10b-5.
    
    3. Venue is proper in this district pursuant to Section 27 of the Exchange Act because
    defendant Premiere Technologies transacts substantial business in this district, and many
    of the alleged acts, transactions and conduct constituting violations of law, including the
    preparation, issuance and dissemination to the investing public of materially false and
    misleading information, occurred, at least in part, in this district.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Plaintiff, for his class action complaint alleges upon information and belief, except as to
  • This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to Section 27 of
  • 15 U.S.C. §§ 78jand 78t; and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the Securities and Exchange
  • This action is brought as a class action on behalf of all persons or entities who purchased
  • During the Class Period, defendants engaged in a course of conduct that was designed to, and Period; allow certain defendants to avail of their knowledge of the Company's inflated stock price
  • plaintiff and each member of the Class purchased shares of Premiere Technologies common stock
  • Plaintiff and each member of the Class directly or indirectly relied upon the individual
  • Premiere Technologies provides enhanced communications services including 800 number based
  • Premiere Technologies and the Individual Defendants engaged in a common course of conduct, bility to smoothly integrate Voice-Tel into its operation, to conceal the latter information in
  • because of their positions as officers and directors of Premiere Technologies had access to
  • The statements made by the defendants as outlined below, either were materially false and
  • Excluded from the Class are the defendants, members of the immediate family of each of the
  • Period omitted to state or misrepresented material facts about the Company's ongoing problems
  • defendants made public misrepresentations during the Class Period,
  • As the Company would subsequently reveal, defendants had neither the systems nor the
  • Defendants' primary currency for their aggressive acquisition program was the Company's own
  • Premiere Technologies today announced that it has signed definitive agreements to acquire
  • With the acquisition of Voce-Tel's network, Premiere believes it will be the first computer
  • Defendant Jones was quoted as saying that:
  • Net income per share for the first quarter was up 220%, to $0.16, versus the $0.05 reported
  • We have a highly automated business in place, new products coming to market, established
  • These percentage increases exclude both one-time charges and related tax effects primarily

  • 3 . COMPLAINT 2

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    VOICE-TEL
    ACQUISITION
    FINANCIALS
    PLAINTIFFS
    DEFENDANTS
    CONSOLIDATION
    EXCHANGE
    COMMON STOCK
    EXCHANGE ACT
    SECURITIES
    MANAGEMENT
    JONES
    COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES
    CLASS ACTION
    INTEGRATION
    SALES FORCE
    TECHNOLOGIES
    CLASS PERIOD
    INTERNAL CONTROLS
    ORCHESTRATE
    INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
    VOICE-TEL FRANCHISES
    LOCAL ACCESS
    ALLEGATIONS
    VOICE-TEL ENTERPRISES
    ENHANCED PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS
    REPRESENTING
    ACCOUNTING CONTROLS SUFFICIENT
    SECURITIES LITIGATION
    
    
    
                                 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                           FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
                                        ATLANTA DIVISION
    IN RE PREMIERE TECHNOLOGIES, ) CIVIL ACTION NO.
    
    INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION ) 1:98-CV-1804-JOF
    
    ) Jury Trial Demanded
                SECOND AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
                       FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
                          AND THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                                          INTRODUCTION
    Plaintiffs and all others similarly situated, by and through their attorneys, allege the
    following upon personal knowledge as to themselves, several allegations identified herein
    and various allegations concerning the acquisition of Voice-Tel Enterprises, Inc., and
    upon the investigation made by and through Plaintiffs' attorneys, which included, without
    limitation, a review and analysis of the public filings by Premiere Technologies, Inc.
    ("Premiere" or "the Company"), with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"),
    interviews with former officers and directors of the Company, articles in the financial
    news media, press releases, and other publicly available information concerning the
    Company. Plaintiffs believe further evidentiary support exists for the allegations set forth
    herein after a reasonable opportunity for discovery.
                                        NATURE OF ACTION
    1. Plaintiffs bring this class action on behalf of all persons or entities (the "Class") who
    purchased or otherwise acquired Premiere's common stock from February 11, 1997
    through June 10, 1998, inclusive (the "Class Period"), including two subclasses. The
    "Voice-Tel Subclass" consists of all persons who acquired their Premiere common stock
    in connection with the purchase of their independent Voice-Tel Enterprises, Inc. ("Voice-
    Tel") franchises by Premiere between April 1997 and June 1997 (represented by
    Plaintiffs Paul Sandler and Elinor Ziv). The "Xpedite Subclass" consists of all of persons
    who acquired their Premiere common stock in exchange for previously held shares of
    Xpedite Systems, Inc. ("Xpedite") pursuant to a Registration Statement and a Joint Proxy
    Statement/Prospectus attached thereto (the "Registration Statement") filed with the SEC
    on or around January 28, 1998 (represented by Plaintiff Farley Katz). Plaintiffs seek, on
    behalf of themselves and the Class and two Subclasses, to recover damages that
    Defendants' violations of the federal securities laws caused them to suffer.
    
    2. Defendants engaged in a common course of conduct to create and prolong the illusion
    that the Company had adequate internal controls, organizational support, financial
    stability and depth of management experience to manage and grow the business
    relationships it had developed and to integrate new companies smoothly and quickly with
    minimal impact on Premiere's existing business, while Defendants knew or recklessly
    disregarded that the Company did not possess these things.
    
    3. While Defendants touted the purported synergies and economies arising from the many
    acquisitions of new companies by Premiere during the Class Period, they failed to reveal
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN RE PREMIERE TECHNOLOGIES,) CIVIL ACTION NO.
  • INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION) 1:98-CV-1804-JOF
  • AND THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  • Plaintiffs and all others similarly situated, by and through their attorneys, allege the rviews with former officers and directors of the Company, articles in the financial news media,
  • Plaintiffs bring this class action on behalf of all persons or entities who purchased or
  • The "Voice-Tel Subclass" consists of all persons who acquired their Premiere common stock in
  • Plaintiffs seek, on behalf of themselves and the Class and two Subclasses, to recover damages
  • Defendants engaged in a common course of conduct to create and prolong the illusion that the
  • During the Class Period, Defendants failed to disclose that the Company had inadequate
  • Premiere common stock in connection with the acquisition by Premiere of a "first wave" of
  • Both Plaintiffs Sandler and Ziv were named as plaintiffs representing the Voice-Tel Subclass
  • Plaintiffs Lewis, Sandler, Ziv, and Katz's signed certifications required by the Private
  • Premiere provides enhanced communications services including 800 number based services, voice
  • Jones") is, and has been, since the inception of the Company, Chairman of the Board and Chief
  • membership on the Company's Board of Directors, their ability to make public statements in
  • Premiere was followed by various analysts employed by brokerage firms who wrote reports that
  • issuer that has securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act, such as
  • Scheduled to be rolled out in the first quarter of 1997, Orchestrate coordinates a variety of
  • Premiere should soon be in a position to begin developing a local access flatrate service
  • The acquired businesses will benefit from the increased financial flexibility, regional
  • Premiere now has the opportunity to achieve greater worldwide market penetration, not only
  • Publishing Premiere's financials for the third quarter of 1997 ending September 30, 1997, the
  •    |