LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v MILAN CAPITAL GROUP, INC., et al Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-17122, CourtName: ON APPLICATION BY THE COMMISSION, THE COURT APPOINTED A RECEIVER OF, Defendant: Milan Capital Group, Inc., Investment Offices d/b/a AC Financial, Inc., Ira A. Monas, Michael Irwin Lamhut, Jason M. Cope, Rita A. Monas, Jennifer Monas, Sands Point International Corp., Douglas H. Monas, Michaels Capital Consultants, Inc., and HWK Consultants, Inc, Plaintiff: SEC, State: WA Washington, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-17122, Monas, Milan, Cope, Judgement, Commission, Securities, Investors, Broker-dealer, Violation, Antifraud Provisions, Ipo, Lamhut, Fraud, Pay, Disgorgement, Relief Defendants, Broker-dealer Registration Provisions, Assets, Receiver, Securities Laws, York, District, Consultants, Complaint, Enjoining, Charged Monas, Federal Securities Laws, Shares , ContentID: 120246621

Case Documents
1 2001-09-07 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 116087
2 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COURT
MILAN
COPE
JUDGEMENT
COMMISSION
SECURITIES
DEFENDANTS
INVESTORS
BROKER-DEALER
VIOLATION
ANTIFRAUD PROVISIONS
IPO
LAMHUT
FRAUD
PAY
DISGORGEMENT
RELIEF DEFENDANTS
BROKER-DEALER REGISTRATION PROVISIONS
ASSETS
RECEIVER
SECURITIES LAWS
YORK
DISTRICT
CONSULTANTS
COMPLAINT
ENJOINING
CHARGED MONAS
FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS
SHARES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.

Litigation Release No. 17122 / September 7, 2001

   ., 00 Civ. 108 (DLC) (S.D.N.Y.)

   SEC OBTAINS $19 MILLION JUDGMENT IN IPO STOCK FRAUD CASE

   On August 14, 2001, the Commission obtained a final judgment requiring
   four defendants to pay a total of $19,395,066 in disgorgement,
   interest, and civil penalties in its securities fraud case involving
   Milan Capital Group, Inc., a company formerly based in Melville, New
   York, and Investment Offices d/b/a AC Financial, Inc., a former
   broker-dealer. The final judgment, by the United States District Court
   for the Southern District of New York, was entered against defendants
   Milan, AC Financial, Ira A. Monas, Jason M. Cope, and relief
   defendants Rita A. Monas, Jennifer Monas, Sands Point International
   Corp., Douglas H. Monas, Michael's Capital Consultants, Inc., and HWK
   Consultants, Inc. The opinion is reported at 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
   11804 (S.D.N.Y. August 14, 2001).

   The Commission filed its original complaint in this matter on January
   7, 2000, charging Milan with unlawfully offering for sale, and
   purportedly selling, IPO securities while failing to be registered
   with the Commission as a broker-dealer. On that same day, the Court
   granted the Commission's request for a temporary restraining order
   freezing Milan's assets and enjoining Milan from acting as an
   unregistered broker-dealer. (January 10, 2000). On January 21, 2000,
   on application by the Commission, the Court appointed a receiver of
   Milan to, among other things, identify and secure Milan's assets and
   property, ascertain the disposition of investors' funds, and ensure
   the fair treatment of all investors who dealt with Milan.

   In an amended complaint filed on February 29, 2000, the Commission
   charged Monas, Cope, Michael I. Lamhut, and others with violating the
   antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws, and charged
   Monas, Cope, and Lamhut with aiding and abetting Milan's violation of
   the broker-dealer registration provisions. The Commission also named
   members of Monas' family and three entities as relief defendants.
   (March 1, 2000).

   On November 9, 2000, the Court granted the Commission's motion for
   partial summary judgment, finding that Monas and Milan, through Cope
   and his team of brokers at the AC Financial Pittsburgh office,
   convinced approximately 200 customers to pay almost $9 million for
   shares in several IPOs. The Court found that Milan did not have access
   to IPOs and never provided investors with any IPO shares. The Court
SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • SEC OBTAINS $19 MILLION JUDGMENT IN IPO STOCK FRAUD CASE
  • On August 14, 2001, the Commission obtained a final judgment requiring four defendants to pay
  • The final judgment, by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New
  • The Commission filed its original complaint in this matter on January 7, 2000, charging Milan
  • the Court granted the Commission's request for a temporary restraining order freezing Milan's
  • On January 21, 2000, on application by the Commission, the Court appointed a receiver of
  • In an amended complaint filed on February 29, 2000, the Commission charged Monas, Cope,
  • The Commission also named members of Monas' family and three entities as relief defendants.
  • On November 9, 2000, the Court granted the Commission's motion for partial summary judgment,
  • The Court found that Monas, Cope, and Lamhut violated the antifraud provisions of the federal
  •    |