LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v JAMES SHERET, JR. and GLENN E. CONLEY Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-17133, CourtCode: DIS, CourtName: DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ENTERED A FINAL, Defendant: James Sheret, Jr. and Glenn E. Conley, Plaintiff: SEC, State: NY New York, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-17133, Conley, Securities, Exchange Commission, Disgorgement, Glenn, District, Permanent, Fraudulent, Pay, Amount, Penalties, Touting, Trading, Stocks, Traded Public Companies, Internet, Admitting, Denying, Allegations, Complaint, Permanently Enjoins, Restrains, Violating, Exchange Act, Thereunder, Engaging, Fraudulent Activity, Connection, Purchase, Sale , ContentID: 120246610

Case Documents
1 2001-09-18 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 116076
1 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 1 page.    CAUTION.    PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A ONE PAGE CASE.
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
DISGORGEMENT
GLENN
DISTRICT
PERMANENT
FRAUDULENT
PAY
AMOUNT
PENALTIES
TOUTING
TRADING
STOCKS
TRADED PUBLIC COMPANIES
INTERNET
ADMITTING
DENYING
ALLEGATIONS
COMPLAINT
PERMANENTLY ENJOINS
RESTRAINS
VIOLATING
EXCHANGE ACT
THEREUNDER
ENGAGING
FRAUDULENT ACTIVITY
CONNECTION
PURCHASE
SALE
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Litigation Release No. 17133 / September 18, 2001

   Securities and Exchange Commission v. James Sheret, Jr. and Glenn E.
   Conley, Civil Action No. 00 Civ. 1411 LTS (D. SDNY)

   The Commission announced that on August 9, 2001, the United States
   District Court for the Southern District of New York entered a Final
   Judgment of Permanent Injunction Against Defendant Glenn E. Conley.
   Conley engaged in multiple fraudulent and deceptive schemes to profit
   from his touting and trading of the stocks of thinly traded public
   companies over the Internet.

   Conley, without admitting or denying the allegations of the complaint,
   consented to the order which permanently enjoins and restrains him
   from violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
   thereunder by engaging in fraudulent activity in connection with the
   purchase or sale of any security. Conley was also ordered to pay
   disgorgement in the amount of $458,965. All but $209,253 of the
   disgorgement was waived and no penalties imposed based on Conley's
   demonstrated inability to pay the full amount of disgorgement or any
   penalty.
     _________________________________________________________________

Modified 09/18/2001
SNIPPETS:
  • Securities and Exchange Commission v. James Sheret,
  • The Commission announced that on August 9, 2001, the United States District Court for the
  • Conley engaged in multiple fraudulent and deceptive schemes to profit from his touting and
  • Conley, without admitting or denying the allegations of the complaint, consented to the order
  • All but $209,253 of the disgorgement was waived and no penalties imposed based on Conley's
  •    |