SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 17139 / September 19, 2001
ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING ENFORCEMENT RELEASE NO. 1448
SEC SETTLES FRAUD ACTION AGAINST CEC INDUSTRIES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. C.E.C. INDUSTRIES CORPORATION,
GERALD H. LEVINE, and MARIE A. LEVINE, Case No. 1 99CV02568 (D.D.C.)
On September 10, 2001, the United States District Court for the
District of Columbia permanently enjoined C.E.C. Industries
Corporation from violating the anti-fraud and certain record-keeping
and internal controls provisions of the federal securities laws.
C.E.C. was further ordered by the Court to, within 90 days of the
entry of the judgment, file amended quarterly and annual reports with
the Commission restating the financial results for its fiscal years
ended March 31, 1996 and March 31, 1997, and its fiscal quarters ended
June 30, September 30, and December 31, 1997. C.E.C. also was enjoined
from failing to file timely and accurate quarterly and annual reports
in the future and ordered to file all of its delinquent quarterly and
annual reports for its fiscal year ended March 31, 1998 and all
subsequent periods.
The Commission's complaint, filed September 28, 1999, alleged that
C.E.C. fraudulently overstated its assets and revenues in public
filings and other public statements during the company's fiscal years
ended March 31, 1996 and March 31, 1997. According to the complaint,
these material overstatements all resulted from various asset exchange
transactions in which C.E.C. acquired non-cash assets in exchange for
either company stock or other non-cash assets previously acquired with
company stock. The complaint also alleges that C.E.C. has been
chronically delinquent in filing required reports with the Commission
since June 1997, and has not filed any required reports since July
1998. The Commission contends that Gerald and Marie Levine, as
C.E.C.'s controlling officers and directors during the relevant time
period, were directly responsible for C.E.C.'s fraudulent
overstatements of assets and revenues, as well as for C.E.C.'s filing
delinquencies. According to the complaint, the Levines also published
false and misleading information about C.E.C. on the Internet during
the period in question.
Without admitting or denying the charges against it, CEC consented to
the entry of an injunction permanently enjoining it from violating
Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Sections 10(b), 13(a),
13(b)(2)(A), and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and Exchange Act Rules 10b-5, 13a-1, 13a-13 and 12b-20. C.E.C. was
SNIPPETS:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SEC SETTLES FRAUD ACTION AGAINST CEC INDUSTRIES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. C.E.C. INDUSTRIES CORPORATION, GERALD H. LEVINE, and
On September 10, 2001, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia
C.E.C. was further ordered by the Court to, within 90 days of the entry of the judgment, file
C.E.C. also was enjoined from failing to file timely and accurate quarterly and annual
The Commission's complaint, filed September 28, 1999, alleged that C.E.C. fraudulently
According to the complaint, these material overstatements all resulted from various asset
The complaint also alleges that C.E.C. has been chronically delinquent in filing required
The Commission contends that Gerald and Marie Levine, as C.E.C.'s controlling officers and
the Levines also published false and misleading information about C.E.C. on the Internet
Without admitting or denying the charges against it, CEC consented to the entry of an
C.E.C. was further ordered to file amended quarterly and annual filings with restated
The Commission continues to litigate this matter against Gerald and Marie Levine.
|