LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-17149, CourtCode: DIS, CourtName: DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, CIVIL ACTION NO. 01 C, Defendant: The Chase Manhattan Bank, Plaintiff: SEC, State: IL Illinois, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-17149, Chase, Commission, Complaint, Securities, Bond, Reports, Transfer Agent, York, Exchange Commission, District, Violations, Amount, Reserve, Cease-and-desist Order, United States, Chase Manhattan Bank, Reconcile, Complaint Alleges, York Banking, Morgan Chase, According, Inaccuracies, Reasons, Liability, Outstanding, Dollar Amount, Bondholders, Master Securityholder Files, Issuer, Control Books , ContentID: 120246594

Case Documents
1 2001-09-24 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 116060
2 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COMMISSION
COMPLAINT
SECURITIES
BOND
REPORTS
TRANSFER AGENT
YORK
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
DISTRICT
VIOLATIONS
AMOUNT
RESERVE
CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER
UNITED STATES
CHASE MANHATTAN BANK
RECONCILE
COMPLAINT ALLEGES
YORK BANKING
MORGAN CHASE
ACCORDING
INACCURACIES
REASONS
LIABILITY
OUTSTANDING
DOLLAR AMOUNT
BONDHOLDERS
MASTER SECURITYHOLDER FILES
ISSUER
CONTROL BOOKS
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Litigation Release No. 17149 / September 24, 2001

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION V. THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, U.S.
District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Civil Action No. 01 C
7364 (N.D. Il. September 24, 2001)

   On September 24, 2001, the Securities and Exchange Commission
   (Commission) filed a complaint seeking a $1 million civil penalty
   against The Chase Manhattan Bank (Chase) in the United States District
   Court for the Northern District of Illinois alleging that Chase
   committed recordkeeping and reporting violations while acting as a
   registered transfer agent for numerous corporate and municipal bond
   issues. Chase consented to the imposition of the penalty without
   admitting or denying the allegations in the Complaint. Chase, a New
   York banking corporation wholly owned by J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., and
   based in New York, New York, is a registered transfer agent. According
   to the Complaint, by March 1998, Chase, and companies with which it
   had merged, had identified but failed to reconcile inaccuracies in its
   computerized bond recordkeeping system totaling more than $46.8
   billion. Chase reasonably and correctly believed that the $46.8
   billion did not reflect a liability of anywhere near this magnitude.
   Chase based its belief upon, among other reasons, the cash management
   systems it had in place, which were generally accurate and did not
   reflect any liability at the time. The Complaint further alleges that
   Chase did not fully reconcile these records until June 2000. During
   this two-year period, according to the Complaint, Chase
     * Filed false TA-2 Reports (annual reports required of transfer
       agents);

     * Discovered that its computerized records of the outstanding dollar
       amount of bonds held by bondholders, which the Commission requires
       a transfer agent to maintain, contained significant errors. These
       records are maintained in its master securityholder files;

     * Discovered that its records, by issuer, of the dollar amount of
       bonds issued and outstanding, which the Commission requires a
       transfer agent to maintain, often were not readily accessible or
       reliable. These records are maintained in control books;

     * Failed to provide the required notice in the prescribed manner to
       the appropriate regulators, or to issuers, that its records showed
       significant differences between its master securityholder files
       and its control books for a large number of bond issues.

   The Complaint alleges that ultimately Chase was able to reconcile the
   vast bulk of the inaccuracies in its bond recordkeeping system. It
SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Civil
  • On September 24, 2001, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a complaint seeking a $1
  • Chase, a New York banking corporation wholly owned by J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., and based in
  • According to the Complaint, by March 1998, Chase, and companies with which it had merged, had
  • Chase based its belief upon, among other reasons, the cash management systems it had in
  • During this two-year period, according to the Complaint, Chase * Filed false TA-2 Reports;
  • * Discovered that its computerized records of the outstanding dollar amount of bonds held by
  • * Discovered that its records, by issuer, of the dollar amount of bonds issued and
  • * Failed to provide the required notice in the prescribed manner to the appropriate
  • The Complaint alleges that ultimately Chase was able to reconcile the vast bulk of the
  • Approximately $28.8 million of that amount resulted from payment errors, including situations
  • These amounts were not material to any financial reports filed by J. P. Morgan Chase or its
  • The Commission also simultaneously entered a cease-and-desist order prohibiting Chase from
  • The Commission thanks the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and the State of New York Banking
  •    |