LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v CHIQUITA BRANDS INTERNATIONAL, INC Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: LR-17169, CourtCode: FED, CourtName: FEDERAL COURT SEEKING ENTRY OF A CONSENT ORDER REQUIRING CHIQUITA TO, Defendant: Chiquita Brands International, Inc., Plaintiff: SEC, State: WA Washington, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>LR-17169, Chiquita, Commission, Settles, Payment, Banadex, Securities, Exchange Commission, Books, Internal Controls, Provisions, Consent, Colombia, Employees, Accounting, Foreign, Customs Officials, Admitting, Denying, Entry, Audit, Turbo, Colombia Port Facility, Installment Payments, Internal Audit Staff, Audit Review, Internal Investigation, Corrective Action, Terminating, Responsible Banadex Employees, Reinforcing Internal Controls , ContentID: 120246574

Case Documents
1 2001-10-03 SEC LITIGATION RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 116040
1 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 1 page.    CAUTION.    PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A ONE PAGE CASE.
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC LITIGATION RELEASE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COMMISSION
SETTLES
PAYMENT
BANADEX
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
BOOKS
INTERNAL CONTROLS
PROVISIONS
CONSENT
COLOMBIA
EMPLOYEES
ACCOUNTING
FOREIGN
CUSTOMS OFFICIALS
ADMITTING
DENYING
ENTRY
AUDIT
TURBO
COLOMBIA PORT FACILITY
INSTALLMENT PAYMENTS
INTERNAL AUDIT STAFF
AUDIT REVIEW
INTERNAL INVESTIGATION
CORRECTIVE ACTION
TERMINATING
RESPONSIBLE BANADEX EMPLOYEES
REINFORCING INTERNAL CONTROLS
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C.

Litigation Release No. 17169 / October 3, 2001
Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 1464

SEC v. Chiquita Brands International, Inc., Civ. Action No. 1 01CV02079
(D.D.C.)(filed October 3, 2001)

Sec Settles Case against Chiquita Brands International, Inc.

   The Securities and Exchange Commission today issued a settled
   cease-and-desist order against Chiquita Brands International, Inc. in
   which the Commission finds that Chiquita violated the books and
   records -- Section 13(b)(2)(A) -- and internal accounting controls --
   Section 13(b)(2)(B) -- provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of
   1934 in connection with a payment to foreign customs officials by a
   wholly-owned foreign subsidiary of Chiquita. Without admitting or
   denying the Commission's findings, Chiquita consented to the entry of
   an order that requires Chiquita to cease and desist from violating
   those provisions. The Commission also filed a settled complaint in
   federal court seeking entry of a consent order requiring Chiquita to
   pay a $100,000 civil penalty. Chiquita settled the action without
   admitting or denying the Commission's allegations.

   The order finds that Chiquita violated the books and records and
   internal controls provisions as a result of the conduct of its
   Colombian subsidiary, Banadex. According to the order, without the
   knowledge or consent of any Chiquita employees outside Colombia and in
   contravention of Chiquita's policies, employees of Banadex authorized
   the payment of the equivalent of $30,000 to local customs officials to
   secure renewal of a license at Banadex's Turbo, Colombia port
   facility. The subsidiary's books and records incorrectly identified
   the two installment payments, which were made in 1996 and 1997. In
   1997, Chiquita's internal audit staff discovered the payment during an
   audit review and, after an internal investigation, Chiquita took
   corrective action which included terminating the responsible Banadex
   employees and reinforcing internal controls at Banadex.

     _________________________________________________________________

Modified 10/10/2001
SNIPPETS:
  • U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
  • Sec Settles Case against Chiquita Brands International,
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission today issued a settled cease-and-desist order against
  • Without admitting or denying the Commission's findings, Chiquita consented to the entry of an
  • The order finds that Chiquita violated the books and records and internal controls provisions
  • According to the order, without the knowledge or consent of any Chiquita employees outside
  • The subsidiary's books and records incorrectly identified the two installment payments, which
  • In 1997, Chiquita's internal audit staff discovered the payment during an audit review and,
  •    |