United States Securities and Exchange Commission
LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 17181 / October 11, 2001
UNITED STATES v. FRANK L. PEITZ, DANIEL B. BENSON, PETER A. LOUTOS,
SR., ROBERT D. PALADINO, RANDALL W. LAW, and MONICA M. ILES, Criminal
Action No. 01CR0852 (N.D. Ill., Eastern Division)
On October 9, 2001, a grand jury in the U.S. District Court for the
Northern District of Illinois (Eastern Division) returned an
indictment against Frank L. Peitz, Daniel B. Benson, Peter A. Loutos,
Sr., Robert D. Paladino, Randall W. Law and Monica M. Iles. The
indictment arises from the offer and sale of a fraudulent prime bank
trading program through Lennox Investment Group, Ltd., an entity owned
and controlled by Law, and the subsequent misappropriation of funds
collected from investors. The indictment charges each defendant with
eight counts of wire fraud and further charges Peitz, Benson, Loutos
and Paladino with seven counts each of money laundering and one count
each of conspiracy to commit money laundering.
The indictment charges that the defendants raised over $11 million
from at least 30 investors through the offer and sale of a purported
"Small Investment High-Yield Program." The defendants obtained
investor funds through material misstatements and omissions, including
the following (1) investor funds would be used in the international
trading of bank instruments; (2) investor funds would be held in an
escrow account or that collateral of equal value would insure the
safety of investor funds; (3) investor principal was guaranteed; (4)
investors would receive returns of 122 per cent per week for forty
weeks during the one year term of their investment; and (5) the
trading program was regulated and approved by governmental entities
such as the Federal Reserve or by the International Monetary Fund. In
fact, the indictment charges, the purported trading program did not
exist and investor funds were not used to trade banking instruments.
Rather, the defendants systematically disbursed investor funds for the
benefit of themselves and their designees.
The indictment is based on the same conduct alleged in a civil action
brought by the Commission's Fort Worth District Office in June 1998.
(, USDC/ND/TX (Fort Worth Division), Civil Action No. 498-CV-536-Y).
The Commission's complaint, filed June 22, 1998, alleged that Peitz,
Benson, Law, and Iles, among others, violated the antifraud and
securities registration provisions of the federal securities laws by
engaging in the scheme described in the October 9, 2001 indictment.
Specifically, the Commission complaint charged these defendants with
violations of Section 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of
1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule
10b-5 thereunder. The Commission's complaint named Paladino, among
SNIPPETS:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Ill., Eastern Division)
The indictment arises from the offer and sale of a fraudulent prime bank trading program
The indictment charges each defendant with eight counts of wire fraud and further charges
The indictment charges that the defendants raised over $11 million from at least 30 investors
The defendants obtained investor funds through material misstatements and omissions,
was regulated and approved by governmental entities such as the Federal Reserve or by the
In fact, the indictment charges, the purported trading program did not exist and investor
The indictment is based on the same conduct alleged in a civil action brought by the
The Commission's complaint, filed June 22, 1998, alleged that Peitz, Benson, Law, and Iles,
Specifically, the Commission complaint charged these defendants with violations of Section 5,
a receiver appointed by the Court is continuing his efforts to marshal and conserve funds and
|