SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Litigation Release No.17188 / October 15, 2001
SEC v. Jamie P. Piromalli, et al., Civil Action No. C2-00 622, (S.D.
OH)
On June 13, 2001, the Honorable Terence P. Kemp, Magistrate Judge of
the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, entered
Final Judgments against defendants Steven Brewer, A. Michael Jaillett
and Richard Mann, by default, for their participation in a nationwide
Ponzi scheme, involving the offer and sale of unregistered nine-month
promissory notes issued by World Vision Entertainment, Inc. ("World
Vision"), a company located in Altamonte Springs, Florida.
The Commission's Complaint, filed on June 1, 2000, alleged that from
June 1996 to August 1999, Jamie P. Piromalli, Brewer, Jaillett, Mann
and Seth Miller (collectively, "the Defendants"), through World
Vision, raised at least $64 million from approximately 1,200 investors
in 33 states from the sale of promissory notes. The Defendants offered
and sold securities in the form of nine-month promissory notes without
registering them with the Commission. In furtherance of the scheme,
the Defendants, directly and indirectly, through a nationwide sales
network, made numerous false and misleading statements to investors
about the World Vision notes. For example, the Defendants
misrepresented that the notes were unconditionally guaranteed and
insured and that all of the proceeds of the offering would be used to
develop World Vision's products. In reality, the notes were not
guaranteed and the Defendants used the proceeds of the note offering
to pay for the personal and business expenses of company officers and
directors, to cover interest and principal payments to investors and
to pay large, undisclosed commissions to the sales network.
Brewer, Jaillett and Mann were permanently enjoined from future
violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of
1933, Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") and
Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The Commission seeks disgorgement of their
ill-gotten gains, including prejudgment interest, in the amount of
$689,560 from Brewer, $332,148 from Jaillett and $2,012,988 from Mann.
In addition, the Commission seeks civil penalties of $110,000 each
against Brewer, Jaillett and Mann.
For additional information, see (June 1, 2000).
_________________________________________________________________
Modified 10/15/2001
SNIPPETS:
On June 13, 2001, the Honorable Terence P. Kemp, Magistrate Judge of the U.S. District Court
The Commission's Complaint, filed on June 1, 2000, alleged that from June 1996 to August
The Defendants offered and sold securities in the form of nine-month promissory notes without
In furtherance of the scheme, the Defendants, directly and indirectly, through a nationwide
the Defendants misrepresented that the notes were unconditionally guaranteed and insured and
In reality, the notes were not guaranteed and the Defendants used the proceeds of the note
Brewer, Jaillett and Mann were permanently enjoined from future violations of Sections 5,
The Commission seeks disgorgement of their ill-gotten gains, including prejudgment interest,
In addition, the Commission seeks civil penalties of $110,000 each against Brewer, Jaillett
|