LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

CAMPBELL v BACOU USA INC Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 18,932, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: CAMPBELL, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00018932, Bacou, Transaction, Bau, Stock, Common Stock, Philippe Bacou, Christophe Bacou, Shares, Fair Dealing, Shareholders, Sales, Dalloz, Barr, Protect, Damages, International Sales, Price, Unfair, Consummation, Owner, Control, Directors, Fiduciary Duties, Majority, Proper , ContentID: 120246327

Case Documents
1 2001-05-30 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 114990
8 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 8 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANTS
PLAINTIFF
TRANSACTION
BAU
MEMBERS
STOCK
COMMON STOCK
PHILIPPE BACOU
CHRISTOPHE BACOU
SHARES
FAIR DEALING
SHAREHOLDERS
SALES
DALLOZ
BARR
PROTECT
DAMAGES
INTERNATIONAL SALES
PRICE
UNFAIR
BUSINESS
CONSUMMATION
OWNER
LAW
CONTROL
DIRECTORS
FIDUCIARY DUTIES
MAJORITY
PROPER
 b' c;;o                                                                                           
QC' q&L& q&l
  I                        IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE                       
                                          IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY


       CLAIRE CAMPBELL,

                                            Plaintiff,

                   - against -

       BACOU USA INC., BACOU S.A., CHRISTIAN
       DALLOZ  S.A, PHILIPPE BACOU, WALTER
       STEPAN, CHRISTOPHE BACOU, HOWARD S.
       LEIGHT, GILBERT VANDEPUTTE, PHILIP
       BARR, ALFRED J. VERRECCHIA, KARL F.
       ERICSSON.


                                            Defendants.

                                                          COMPLAINT

                            Plaintiff alleges on information and belief, except for those

       pertain to plaintiff which are alleged upon personal knowledge, as follows:

                                                          THE PARTIES

                            1.       Plaintiff is and has been at all relevant times the owner of

       USA, Inc. ("BAU" or the "Company") common stock.

                            2.       BAU is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of

       and is headquartered at 10 Thurber Boulevard, Smithfield, RI 02917. BAU designs,

       manufactures and sells safety products that protect the sight, hearing, hands and respiratory

       systems of work:ers against occupational hazards, as well as related instrumentation

       gas monitors and test equipment for self-contained breathing apparatus.

                            2_I .    Philippe Bacou and Christopher Bacou and other members of the

       family control about 71.5% of BAU's outstanding stock through their control of defendant


SNIPPETS:
  • - against -BACOU USA INC., BACOU S.A., CHRISTIAN DALLOZ S.A, PHILIPPE BACOU, WALTER STEPAN,
  • pertain to plaintiff which are alleged upon personal knowledge,
  • Plaintiff is and has been at all relevant times the owner of shares of Bacou
  • Inc. common stock.
  • BAU is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Delaware
  • manufactures and sells safety products that protect the sight, hearing, hands and respiratory
  • Philippe Bacou and Christopher Bacou and other members of the Bacou
  • family control about 71.5% of BAU's outstanding stock through their control of defendant
  • Defendants Philippe Bacou, Walter Stepan, Christophe Bacou, Howard S.
  • Leight and Gilbert Vandeputte serve as directors of BAU and Bacou.
  • Defendants Philip Barr,
  • Defendant Bacou, as majority shareholder of Bacou, owes the highest fiduciary
  • duties of good faith, loyalty, fair dealing, due care, and candor to plaintiff and the other
  • There are questions of law and fact which are common to the Class and
  • Christian Dalloz S.A..
  • In connection with the transaction,
  • The Transaction is inadequate and unfair to BAU's minority shareholders
  • Sales of our hearing protection, hand protection and gas monitoring product
  • international business has continued to make significant contributions to our results.
  • The price proposed in the Transaction is particularly unfair in light of the
  • its international sales for the quarter increased 14.3% to $11.8 million
  • Defendants will continue to breach their fiduciary duties
  • Granting preliminary and permanent injunctive relief against the consummation of the
  • Ordering defendants to pay to plaintiff and to other members of the Class all damages
  • F. Granting such other and further relief as may be just and proper.
  •    |