LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SIEBEL v HA-LO INDUSTRIES Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 18,953, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: SIEBEL, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00018953, Ha-lo, Earn-out, Merger Agreement, Payment, Common Stock, Mannix, Entitlement, Complaint, Cash, Siebel, Paragraph, Shares, Price, Allegations, Trust, Denies, Amount, Payments, Stock, Ha-lo Admits, Motion, Refuses, Obligations, Pay, Alter, Gretchen Siebel, Amend, Calculation, Faith, Pursuant, Despite, Nyse, Trading, Plaintiff Siebel, Requests, Satisfy, Accordance, Exhibit, Language, Ha-lo Industries, Contravention, First Sentence, Judgement, Breach, Writing, Contravenlion, Paid, Requiring Ha-lo , ContentID: 120246316

Case Documents
1 2001-07-27 INC. OPPOSITION TO HA-LO INDUSTRIES INC.S MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 127233
6 pages
PDF
2 2001-07-27 INC. AMENDED COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 126984
8 pages
PDF
3 2001-07-05 ANSWER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 126985
6 pages
PDF
4 2001-06-08 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 114977
8 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 4 documents , 28 pages
Price: $ 34.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . INC. OPPOSITION TO HA-LO INDUSTRIES INC.S MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PLAINTIFFS
STOCK
EARN-OUT
PRICE
MOTION
MANNIX
COURT
ALTER
AMEND
MERGER AGREEMENT
GRETCHEN SIEBEL
PAYMENT
TRUST
EXHIBIT
LANGUAGE
JUDGEMENT
ENTITLEMENT
FAITH
BREACH
DENY
HERETO
LAW
DEL
REMEDY
MANIPULATION
PERMITTING
ISSUANCE
PAY
HA-LO ALLEGES
              IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

                             IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY


GRETCHEN SIEBEL, individually, GRETCHEN  )
MANNIX, individually, and GRETCHEN SIEBEL )
and GRETCHEN MANNIX  as co-trustees of the          )
Frederick Siebel 1991 Revocable Trust dated
October 16, 199 1 or their successors in trust,      i

                               Plaintiffs,          i        C.A. No. 18953-NC
                       V.
                                                     i
HA-LO Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation,     )

                               Defendant.                                                 ./

                       OPPOSITION TO HA-LO INDUSTRIES,  INC.3
                       MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT

                Plaintiffs Gretchen Siebel ("Siebel"), individually, Gretchen  Mannix ("Mannix"),

individually, and Gretchen Siebel and Gretchen  Mannix as co-trustees of the Frederick Siebel

1991 Revocable Trust dated October 16, 1991 or their successors in trust (the "Trust")

(collectively, "Plaintiffs"), for their opposition to Defendant HA-LO Industries,  Inc.`s ("HA-

LO") Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment, state as follows:

        A.      Background

                1.     HA-LO has had one objective in this matter -- endless delay. There is no

dispute that Plaintiffs are entitled to receive an earn-out payment (the "Earn-Out") in the form of

cash and stock pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger and Plan of Reorganization dated

December 18, 1998 (the "Merger Agreement").               Indeed, HA-LO confirmed Plaintiffs'

entitlement to the Earn-Out on February 14, 2001 when it gave Plaintiffs formal written

notification required by the Merger Agreement of the amounts they were owed for the year 2000.



According to that notice, the Gretchen Siebel Trust and  Mannix  are entitled to Earn-Out

SNIPPETS:
  • GRETCHEN SIEBEL, individually, GRETCHEN) MANNIX, individually, and GRETCHEN SIEBEL)
  • Frederick Siebel 1991 Revocable Trust dated October 16, 199 1 or their successors in trust, i
  • OPPOSITION TO HA-LO INDUSTRIES, INC.3
  • Plaintiffs Gretchen Siebel, individually, Gretchen Mannix,
  • Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment,
  • dispute that Plaintiffs are entitled to receive an earn-out payment in the form of
  • notification required by the Merger Agreement of the amounts they were owed for the year 2000.
  • prior refusal to pay the Earn-Out and was forced to admit that "there is no legal or factual
  • concerning Mannix's entitlement to the Earn-Out for the calendar year 2000..
  • Plaintiff Mannix's motion and the Court entered the Order attached to such motion.
  • HA-LO alleges that it inadvertently failed to notice the language of the Order
  • The fact that HA-LO consistently refused to pay the Eam-Out, thus forcing Plaintiffs to file
  • HA-LO's eleventh hour effort to deny Plaintiff Mannix her full Earn-Out payment is but yet
  • of law or to prevent manifest injustice.
  • See Nash v. Schock, Del.
  • Exhibit B hereto).
  • the calculation of stock price.
  • HA-LO has been in knowing breach of the Merger Agreement for months.
  • HA-LO's bad faith and willful breach of the Merger Agreement is to base the price of the stock
  • The Order Entered By The Court Is The Most Appropriate Remedy
  • would have been free to select any issuance date within the 25-day period.
  • would be grossly unfair to allow HA-LO to profit by this delay by permitting it to select an
  • any manipulation of the stock price by HA-LO.

  • 2 . INC. AMENDED COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PLAINTIFFS
    EARN-OUT
    MERGER AGREEMENT
    PAYMENT
    COMMON STOCK
    ENTITLEMENT
    SIEBEL
    TRUST
    SHARES
    MANNIX
    CASH
    AMOUNT
    REFUSES
    CONTRAVENTION
    OBLIGATIONS
    PRICE
    HA-LO INDUSTRIES
    PURSUANT
    BUSINESS
    CALCULATION
    DESPITE
    SATISFY
    NYSE
    TRADING
    PAY
    REQUIRING HA-LO
    REQUESTS
    ACCORDANCE
    WRITING
    
                  IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAW
    
                                 IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
                                      -
                                                         )
    GRETCHEN SIEBEL, individually, GRETCHEN  )
    MANNIX, individually, and GRETCHEN  SIEBEL )
    and GRETCHEN MANNIX  as co-trustees of the           )
    Frederick Siebel 199 1 Revocable Trust dated         1
    October 16, 1991 or their successors in trust,
                                                         1
                                  Plaintiffs,                      C.A. No. 18953-NC         '
                           V.                            ;
                                                         >
    HA-LO Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation,      )
    
                                  Defendant.             i                                   _
    
    
                                       AMENDED COMPLAINT
    
                    Plaintiffs Gretchen Siebel ("Siebel"), individually, Gretchen  Mannix  ("Mannix"),
    
    individually, and Gretchen Siebel and Gretchen  Mannix  as co-trustees of the Frederick Siebel
    
    1991 Revocable Trust dated October 16, 1991 or their successors in trust (the "Trust")
    
    (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), by their undersigned attorneys, for their Amended Complaint against
    
    Defendant HA-LO Industries, Inc. ("HA-LO") allege as follows:
    
                                           Nature of the Action
    
            1.      Plaintiffs bring this action to, among other things, specifically enforce their
    
    contractual rights pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger and Plan of Reorganization By
    
    and Among HA-LO Industries, Inc., Upshot (New York), Inc., Studio Acquisition Corp., Siebel
    
    Marketing Group, Inc., Studio 800 Ltd, Siebel Production Group LLC, Gretchen Siebel,
    
    Gretchen  Mannix, and Frederick Siebel 1991 Revocable Trust, dated as of December 18, 1998
    
    
    
    (the "Merger Agreement"). Defendant HA-LO has engaged in a pattern of conduct whereby it
    
    has willfully breached its obligations under the Merger Agreement.
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • GRETCHEN SIEBEL, individually, GRETCHEN) MANNIX, individually, and GRETCHEN SIEBEL)
  • 1991 Revocable Trust dated October 16, 1991 or their successors in trust
  • Defendant HA-LO Industries,
  • Plaintiffs bring this action to, among other things, specifically enforce their
  • contractual rights pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger and Plan of Reorganization By
  • has willfully breached its obligations under the Merger Agreement.
  • Under the Merger Agreement, Plaintiffs are entitled to an earn-out payment (the
  • "Earn-Out") each year, for the three consecutive twelve month periods immediately
  • entitled to 19.8% of the net revenues of the business of the surviving company of the merger.
  • Payments under the Earn-Out are to be made fifty percent in cash and fifty percent
  • in common stock of HA-LO, determined pursuant to a formula set forth in the Merger
  • Although HA-LO readily acknowledges Plaintiffs' entitlement to the Earn-Out
  • Despite representing orally and in writing that Plaintiffs are entitled to the 2000
  • HA-LO has refused to satisfy its contractual obligation under the Merger
  • Numerous requests for payment by Plaintiffs have been met with a refusal even to
  • by issuing the shares owed Plaintiffs and satisfying the
  • hereunder in accordance with generally accepted accounting
  • writing of said amount..
  • quotient by the average closing price of Acquirer Common Stock
  • In Contravention Of Its Contractual Obligations
  • Pursuant to that calculation, Mr. Kelley informed Plaintiffs that Siebel by way of the Trust
  • issued to Plaintiffs pursuant to the Earn-Out shall be based on "the average closing price of
  • HA-LO has offered no excuse for failing to pay the Earn-Out.
  • HA-LO refuses to issue shares of common stock to Plaintiffs or make the cash
  • requiring HA-LO to issue shares of HA-LO Common Stock to the Trust and Mannix valuing

  • 3 . ANSWER

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    COMPLAINT
    PARAGRAPH
    ALLEGATIONS
    DENIES
    PLAINTIFF
    EARN-OUT
    PAYMENTS
    HA-LO ADMITS
    PLAINTIFF SIEBEL
    MERGER AGREEMENT
    MANNIX
    FIRST SENTENCE
    PAID
    SECOND SENTENCE
    COMMON STOCK
    DISCLOSURE SCHEDULES
    ALLOCATION
    COURT
    CALCULATION
    CASH
    RELIEF
    COUNSEL
    GRETCHEN SIEBEL
    DEFENDANT
    HA-LO INDUSTRIES
    MANNER
    AMOUNTS
    PAYMENTS RELATING
    RECITE
    
                 IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                    IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    GRETCHEN SIEBEL and
    GRETCHEN  MANNIX,                            ?
    
                     Plaintiffs,                 ;>
           V.                                            Case No. 18953-NC
                                                 1
    HA-LO INDUSTRIES, INC., a Delaware           )
    Corporation,
                                                 I
                     Defendant.                  >1
    
                                                ANSWER
    
           Defendant, HA-LO Industries, Inc. ("HA-LO"), by its attorneys, for its answer to the
    
    Complaint, states as follows:
    
           1.        HA-LO admits the allegations of the first sentence and denies the allegations of
    
    the second sentence of paragraph 1 of the Complaint.
    
           2.        HA-LO admits that pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, Plaintiff
    
    Mannix is entitled to receive certain additional consideration, referred to as "earn-out" payments,
    
    but denies that the allegations of paragraph 2 of the Complaint fully and accurately allege the
    
    terms under which such payments are to be made or the manner in which the amounts of such
    
    payments are to be calculated. HA-LO denies that Plaintiff Siebel is entitled to receive any earn-
    
    out payments.
    
           3.        HA-LO admits that Plaintiff  Mannix is entitled to receive certain earn-out
    
    payments relating to the year 2000 and that in a letter dated February 14, 2001, it notified
    
    Plaintiffs of HA-LO's calculation of the sums to be paid in cash and in HA-LO common stock,
    
    
    
    as determined by the terms of the Merger Agreement. HA-LO denies that Plaintiff Siebel is
    
    entitled to any earn-out payment and denies the remaining allegations of paragraph 3 of the
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • Defendant, HA-LO Industries, Inc., by its attorneys, for its answer to the
  • the second sentence of paragraph 1 of the Complaint.
  • Mannix is entitled to receive certain additional consideration, referred to as "earn-out"
  • but denies that the allegations of paragraph 2 of the Complaint fully and accurately allege
  • terms under which such payments are to be made or the manner in which the amounts of such
  • HA-LO denies that Plaintiff Siebel is entitled to receive any earnout payments.
  • payments relating to the year 2000 and that in a letter dated February 14, 2001, it notified
  • Plaintiffs of HA-LO's calculation of the sums to be paid in cash and in HA-LO common stock,
  • Plaintiffs' knowledge or beliefs at the time they entered into the Merger Agreement.
  • HA-LO admits the allegations of paragraph 5 of the Complaint.
  • HA-LO admits the allegations of the first sentence of paragraph 7 of the
  • but denies that those allegations fully and accurately recite those terms.
  • forth in Section 2.4of the Company Disclosure Schedules (the `Shareholder Earn-Out
  • Allocation Percentages')," and that as set Forth in the related Section 2.04Schedule, entitled
  • Plaintiffs on or about February 14, 2001, regarding the amounts of earn-out to be paid for the
  • HA-LO admits the allegations of the second sentence of paragraph 14 of the
  • The complaint fails to state a claim for which relief can be granted as to plaintiff
  • Gretchen Siebel.
  • Of Counsel:

  • 4 . COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    EARN-OUT
    HA-LO
    PAYMENT
    MERGER AGREEMENT
    COMMON STOCK
    ENTITLEMENT
    CASH
    SHARES
    SIEBEL
    MANNIX
    AMOUNT
    REFUSES
    OBLIGATIONS
    CONTRAVENLION
    PRICE
    PURSUANT
    BUSINESS
    DESPITE
    REQUESTS
    NYSE
    TRADING
    PAY
    ACCORDANCE
    STUDIO
    DETERMINATION
    CALCULATION
    WRITING
    SATISFY
    FAITH
    
               IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                     IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    
    GRETCHEN SIEBEL and
    GRETCHEN  MANNIX,
    
                                      Plaintiffs, C.A. No. /- x'fa;
                                                                             N s     C :  :
                               V.                                                        _  _
                                                                              :          ,~
    HA-LO Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation,                                    I >- ;
                                      Defendant.
                          -                                >                             I -.f/? ._
                                                    COMPLAINT
    
                   Plaintiffs Gretchen Siebel and Gretchen  Marmix  ("Plaintiffs"), by their
    
    undersigned attorneys, for their Complaint against Defendant HA-LO Industries, Inc. ("HA-LO")
    
    allege as follows:
    
                                             Nature off the Action
                                                                 -
    
            1. Plaintiffs bring this action to, among other things, specifically enforce their
    
    contractual rights pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger and Plan of Reorganization By
    
    and Among HA-LO Industries, Inc., Upshot (New York), Inc., Studio Acquisition Corp., Siebel
    
    Marketing Group, Inc., Studio  800 Ltd, Siebel Production Group  LLC, Gretchen Siebel,
    
    Gretchen  Mannix, and Frederick Siebel 1991 Revocable Trust, dated as of December  `18, 1998
    
    (the "Merger Agreement"). Defendant HA-LO has engaged in a pattern of conduct whereby it
    
    has willfully breached its obligations under the Merger Agreement.
    
           2. Under the Merger Agreement, Plaintiffs are  entitle'd to an earn-out payment (the
    
    "Earn-Out") each year, for the three (3)  cc'nsecutive  twelve (12) month periods immediately
    
    
    
    following the effective time of the Merger Agreement. `The Earn-Out provide,s  that Plaintiffs are
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Plaintiffs Gretchen Siebel and Gretchen Marmix,
  • undersigned attorneys, for their Complaint against Defendant HA-LO Industries, Inc.
  • Plaintiffs bring this action to, among other things, specifically enforce their
  • contractual rights pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger and Plan of Reorganization By
  • Marketing Group, Inc., Studio 800 Ltd, Siebel Production Group LLC, Gretchen Siebel,
  • Gretchen Mannix, and Frederick Siebel 1991 Revocable Trust, dated as of December `18, 1998
  • has willfully breached its obligations under the Merger Agreement.
  • Under the Merger Agreement, Plaintiffs are entitle'd to an earn-out payment (the
  • "Earn-Out") each year, for the three cc'nsecutive twelve month periods immediately
  • Payments under the Earn-Out are to be made fifty percent in cash and fifty percent
  • in common stock of HA-LO, determined pursuant to a formula set forth in the Merger
  • Although HA-LO readily acknowledges Plaintiffs" entitlement to the Earn-Out
  • it refuses to honor its obligations in direct contravenlion of the terms of
  • Despite representing orally and in writing that Plaintiffs are entitled to the 2000
  • HA-LO has refused to satisfy its contractual1 obligation under the Merger
  • Plaintiffs believed that HA-LO was acting in good faith.
  • by issuing the shares owed Plaintiffs and satisf$ng the
  • Studio 800 Ltd., business units of HA-LO.
  • hereunder in accordance with generally accepted accounting
  • writing of said amount..
  • is made by the with respect to the determination of
  • quotient by the average closing price of Acquirer lCommon Stock
  • Pursuant to that calculation, Mr. Kelley informed Plaintiffs that Ms.
  • issued to Plaintiffs pursuant to the Earn-Out shall be based on "the average closing price:
  • HA-LO has offered no excuse for failing to pay the Earn-Out.
  • given, despite repeated requests, for the failure to issue the Earn-Out stock.
  • Nevertheless, HA-L,0 refuses to issue shares of common stock lo Plaintiffs or make the cash
  •    |