LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

DAVIDSON v GORMAN Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 18,972, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: DAVIDSON, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00018972, Consent Solicitation, Individual Defendants, Second Consent Solicitation, First Consent Solicitation, Pec, Davidson, Blasberg, Eggs, Facts, Directors, Consent Solicitation Letter, Written Consent, Stockholders, Motion, Shareholders, Dismiss, John Davidson, Paragraph, Pasteurization, Disclosure, Allegations, Supplemental Complaint, Deny, Marketing Plan, Deficiencies, Inconsistent, Delaware, Proceeding, Pec Stockholders, Arthur Blasberg, Misleading, Inter, Speaks, Fiduciary Duties , ContentID: 120246307

Case Documents
1 2001-08-10 PLAINTIFFS ANSWERING BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 127062
37 pages
PDF
2 2001-07-16 ANSWER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 126977
7 pages
PDF
3 2001-06-22 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 114968
11 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 3 documents , 55 pages
Price: $ 29.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . PLAINTIFFS ANSWERING BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
SECOND CONSENT SOLICITATION
PLAINTIFFS
FIRST CONSENT SOLICITATION
DAVIDSON
COURT
FACTS
BLASBERG
EGGS
PEC
STOCKHOLDERS
WRITTEN CONSENT
MOTION
DISMISS
DIRECTORS
SHAREHOLDERS
JOHN DAVIDSON
DISCLOSURE
SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT
CONSENT SOLICITATION LETTER
DEFICIENCIES
PROCEEDING
MARKETING PLAN
FIDUCIARY DUTIES
INCORPORATION
PASTEURIZED EGGS
MISLEADING
NOMINAL DEFENDANT
FIDUCIARY DUTY
          IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

                            IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY


L. JOHN DAVIDSON and ARTHUR.
BLASBERG, JR.,

       Plaintiffs,

               V.

WILLIAM  L. GORMAN,  ARMAND
NOREHAD, and DANIEL BEST,                           CA. No. 18972 NC

       Defendants,

               - and -

PASTEURIZED EGGS CORPORATION,
a Delaware corporation,

       Nominal Defendant.



                     PLAINTIFFS' ANSWERING BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO
                           DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS





                                             Henry E. Gallagher, Jr. (#495)
                                             Arthur G. Connolly, 111 (#2667)
                                             Samuel D. Brickley II (#3276)
                                             Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz LLP
                                             1220 Market Street, P.O. Box 2207
                                             Wilmington, DE 19899
                                             Telephone: (302) 658-9141

Dated: August 10,  2001                      Attomeysfor Plaintijjis



                                            UBLE OF CONTENTS

                                                                                                   

SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • L. JOHN DAVIDSON and ARTHUR.
  • - and -PASTEURIZED EGGS CORPORATION,
  • Nominal Defendant.
  • PLAINTIFFS' ANSWERING BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO
  • DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS
  • STATEMENT OF FACTS.
  • The Individual Defendants' First Consent Solicitation 6
  • The Individual Defendants' Second Consent Solicitation 7
  • The Alleged Deficiencies Of Defendants' Consent Solicitations 8
  • THE SECOND WRITTEN CONSENT IS INVALID ON ITS FACE .20
  • VIABLE DISCLOSURE CLAIMS WITH RESPECT
  • TO THE SECOND CONSENT SOLICITATION.
  • ostensibly removed two directors of the corporation,
  • fiduciaries communicate with or seek action from stockholders.
  • The defendants have moved to dismiss the Supplemental Complaint.
  • founder of Pasteurized Eggs Corporation and its predecessor entity, Pasteurized Eggs,
  • Plaintiff Arthur Blasberg, Jr.
  • He has not served as an officer or as part of management of PEC
  • misleading and it omitted or misstated material facts.
  • Moreover, the First Consent Solicitation Letter supplied no facts to support any of these
  • This concealment from directors Rand and Beinecke, although not disclosed to PEC's
  • The First Consent Solicitation Letter recommended that PEC shareholders remove the plaintiffs
  • claims for breach of the fiduciary duty of disclosure need not plead with particularity;
  • Defendants breached their fiduciary duties of disclosure when they solicited the Second
  • The plaintiffs believe that the statements are false, misleading, and without factual basis,

  • 2 . ANSWER

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PARAGRAPH
    ALLEGATIONS
    CONSENT SOLICITATION LETTER
    DENY
    SPEAKS
    INCONSISTENT
    DEFENDANTS ADMIT
    PEC
    RESPONSIVE PLEADING
    SHAREHOLDERS
    PLAINTIFFS
    COMPLAINT
    DAVIDSON
    LACK KNOWLEDGE
    FIRST SENTENCE
    AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
    DELAWARE CORPORATION
    PURSUANT
    INFORMATION SUFFICIENT
    TRUTH
    DAVIDSON EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT
    COUNSEL
    RELIEF
    JOHN DAVIDSON
    ARTHUR
    EGGS
    NOMINAL DEFENDANT
    ATTORNEYS
    BUSINESS
    
                                                                                                       
                   IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE                                   
    
                                     IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    L. JOHN DAVIDSON,
    and ARTHUR BLASBERG, JR.
    
                      Plaintiffs,
    
             V.
    
    WILLIAM L. GORMAN, ARMAND                             i      C . A .   N o .   18972-NC  :  .=
    NOREHAD, and DANIEL BEST,                                                           P         -
                                                                                              c.. :' :
                                                          1                                       .-
                      Defendants,                                                                   ~.
                                                                                                   3.r
                                                          ;
             -and-
    
    PASTEURIZED EGGS CORPORATION,
    a Delaware corporation,
    
                      Nominal Defendant.
    
                                                 ANSWER
    
                      Defendants William  L. Gorman,  Armand Norehad and Daniel Best
    
    (collectively, the "Individual Defendants"), and Nominal Defendant Pasteurized Eggs
    
    Corporation ("PEC" and, jointly with the Director Defendants, the "Defendants"), by and
    
    through their undersigned attorneys, for their Answer to the Complaint of plaintiffs L.
    
    John Davidson and Arthur BIasberg, Jr. (jointly, the "Plaintiffs"), state, upon knowledge
    
    as to their own acts and upon information and belief as to all other matters, as follows:
    
                      1.       Defendants admit that Plaintiffs purport to bring this action pursuant
    
    to 8 Del. C. 5 225 to seek, inter alia, a status quo order and a determination as to whether
    
    Plaintiffs were lawfully and validly removed as directors of PEC.
    
    
    u'1'3 658130 1
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Defendants William L. Gorman,
  • , and Nominal Defendant Pasteurized Eggs
  • through their undersigned attorneys, for their Answer to the Complaint of plaintiffs L.
  • John Davidson and Arthur BIasberg,
  • Plaintiffs were lawfully and validly removed as directors of PEC.
  • Defendants generally admit the allegations of this Paragraph 2,
  • except that Defendants lack knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
  • truth of the statistical information recited in this Paragraph 2,
  • deny that the events described in this Paragraph 2 were "accomplished under Davidson's
  • Defendants admit the allegations of Paragraph 4.
  • Defendants admit that PEC is a Delaware corporation,
  • capacity as shareholders of PEC, sent a letter to those shareholders of PEC who were
  • either family members, friends, or close business associates of the Individual Defendants,
  • the extent they are inconsistent with the terms ofthe Consent Solicitation Letter.
  • Defendants admit that, pursuant to 8 Del.
  • Paragraph 12 state a conclusion of law as to which no responsive pleading is required.
  • Defendants state that the Consent Solicitation Letter speaks
  • and deny the allegations of the first sentence of Paragraph 12to the extent
  • Fiscal Year 2000, further state that the audited financial statements speak for themselves,
  • Davidson Employment Contract speak for themselves,
  • I caused two copies of the foregoing document to be served upon the following counsel
  • other and further relief as the Court may deem appropriate.

  • 3 . COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
    DIRECTORS
    EGGS
    BLASBERG
    PLAINTIFFS
    CONSENT SOLICITATION LETTER
    PASTEURIZATION
    DAVIDSON
    DELAWARE
    PEC STOCKHOLDERS
    ARTHUR BLASBERG
    COURT
    INTER
    WRITTEN CONSENT
    LAWFUL COMPOSITION
    CONTROL
    MARKETING PLAN
    SHAREHOLDERS
    PRESERVING
    SUMMARY PROCEEDING
    PERMANENTLY ENJOINING
    INCONSISTENT
    DETERMINATION
    ACCOUNTING
    APPROXIMATING
    STRATEGIC PARTNERS
    UNITED STATES
    POTENTIAL CUSTOMERS
    MISLEADING
    
                 IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE                                     /
    
                                   IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    L. JOHN DAVIDSON,                                     >
    and ARTHUR BLASBERG, JR.
                                                          i
                    Plaintiffs,
                                                          i
           V.                                             11
    WILLIAM L. GORMAN,  ARMAND NOREHAD,  ) CA. No.  ].-
                                                                             I  g7  `722  -n/c/
    and DANIEL BEST,
    
                    Defendants,
    
           -and-
    
    PASTEURIZED EGGS CORPORATION,
    a Delaware corporation,
    
                    Nominal Defendant.
    
    
                                       VERIFIED COMPLAINT
    
                                               Introduction
    
           1. Plaintiffs bring this action pursuant to 8 Del. C. § 225 seeking, inter ah, (a) an order
    
    preserving the status quo during the pendency  of this summary proceeding., (b) a declaration of the
    
    lawful composition of, and the continuing membership of the plaintiffs on, .rhe board of directors
    
    Pasteurized Eges Corporation ("PEC")> and (c) an order temporarily and/or permanently enjoining
    
    the individual defendants from taking any actions that would promote or compound the effects of
    
    their unlawful seizure of control of PEC, or that are otherwise inconsistent with the Court's
    
    determination as to the lawful composition of PEC's board of directors, at least until further order
    
    of the Court after a full accounting to the Court of the actions taken since May 25, 200 1.
    
    
    
                                                  The Parties
    
            2.      Plaintiff L. John Davidson ("Davidson") is a resident of New Hampshire, and is a
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • -and-PASTEURIZED EGGS CORPORATION,
  • Plaintiffs bring this action pursuant to 8 Del.
  • preserving the status quo during the pendency of this summary proceeding.,
  • Pasteurized Eges Corporation > and an order temporarily and/or permanently enjoining
  • their unlawful seizure of control of PEC, or that are otherwise inconsistent with the Court's
  • determination as to the lawful composition of PEC's board of directors,
  • of the Court after a full accounting to the Court of the actions taken since May 25,
  • founder of PEC and its predecessor entity, Pasteurized Eggs, L.P. Davidson has served
  • Pasteurization eliminates the risk of egg-related illnesses such as
  • cases per year in the United States,
  • cost approximating $2 billion.
  • Plaintiff Arthur Blasberg, Jr.
  • "Individual Defendants") are residents of the State of Illinois, and have served as three Iof
  • PEC is a Delaware corporation.
  • Letter stated, inter alia, that it was "critical" that the consent solicitation be kept
  • The Consent Solicitation Letter solicited certain stockhol.ders of PEC to consent in
  • Consent of the R.equired Majority of Shareholders of Pasteurized Eggs Corporation,
  • unexecuted copies of the Written Consent to PEC stockholders with the Consent Solicitation
  • vendors and strategic partners"; and "e do not need to tolerate their involvement with the
  • misleading impression that the Consent Solicitation Letter had been approved by a majority of
  • the plaintiffs in order to allow the Individual Defendants to implement "a marketing plan to
  • Blasberg and Davidson "have lost all credibility with the Company's potential customers,
  • enter an order preserving the status quo during the pendency of this proceeding;
  • inconsistent with the Court's determination as to the lawful composition o-fPEC's board of
  •    |