LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

WALLACE v DURWOOD Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 12,855, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: COURT OF CHANCERY, Plaintiff: WALLACE, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00012855, Amc, Motion, Discovery, Dismiss, Stanley, Durwood, Pamela, Esquire, Allege, Tikellis, Franklin Balotti, Wallace, Directors, Employment, Transactions, Enterprises, Theaters, Son, Committee, Suits, Bird, Complaints, Self-dealing, Dispositive Motion, Film, Del , ContentID: 120246292

Case Documents
1 1993-11-01 LETTER OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 114946
8 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 8 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . LETTER OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
MOTION
PLAINTIFFS
DISCOVERY
DEFENDANTS
DISMISS
STANLEY
DURWOOD
COURT
PAMELA
ESQUIRE
ALLEGE
TIKELLIS
FRANKLIN BALOTTI
WALLACE
DIRECTORS
EMPLOYMENT
TRANSACTIONS
ENTERPRISES
THEATERS
SON
MEMBERS
COMMITTEE
SUITS
BIRD
COMPLAINTS
SELF-DEALING
DISPOSITIVE MOTION
FILM
DEL
                                            COURT   OF   CHANCERY
                                                         O F   T H E
                                             STATE   OF   DELAWARE


WILLIAM  T.  ALLEN
    Crrncr`ror                                   November 1, 1993


  Pamela S. Tikellis, Esquire
  Chimicles, Burt & Jau>bsen
  P. 0. Box 1035
  Wilmington, Delaware 19899

  R. Franklin Balotti, Esquire
  Richards, Layton & Finger
  P. 0. Box 551                                                                                 
  Wilmington, Delaware 19899

                      R.E:    Scott C. Wallace v. Stanley H. Durwood,
                              et al. and AMC Entertainment, Inc.,
                              CA. No. 12855; James M. Bird v. Stanley
                              EL Durwood, et al. and AMC Entertainment,
                              LIC.. C A.& 12939

   Dear Counsel:

            Presented for decision is a motion to stay discovery pending resolution of a pending but

   not yet submitted motion to dismiss two cases brought derivatively against directors of AMC,

   Inc. ("AMC"). An Aug;ust 17,1993 Order of Coordination of Pretrial Proceedings, consolidated

   these cases for pretrial proceeding purposes.

            Plaintiffs are &mreholders' of AMC, which is a Delaware corporation based in Kansas

   City, Missouri. AMC operates and manages motion picture theaters nationally. Individual

   defendants are Stanley H. Dunvood, AMC's founder, chief executive officer and chairman of

   its board of directors; Stanley Dunvood'~  son, Edward D. Durwood, currently president and

   vice chairman of the board; and Char1e.s J. Egan and Paul E. Vardeman, directors and members


        `Plaintiff Scott C. Wallace is also  a former senior employee of a subsidiary of AMC.


SNIPPETS:
  • Pamela S. Tikellis, Esquire
  • R. Franklin Balotti, Esquire
  • Scott C. Wallace v. Stanley H. Durwood,
  • not yet submitted motion to dismiss two cases brought derivatively against directors of AMC,
  • Plaintiffs are &mreholders' of AMC, which is a Delaware corporation based in Kansas
  • AMC operates and manages motion picture theaters nationally.
  • `Plaintiff Scott C. Wallace is also a former senior employee of a subsidiary of AMC.
  • Additionally, in one of these suits, (Bird Action)
  • Cohen was chairman (of the AMC ~Finance Committee.
  • Plaintiffs genemlly complain that the defendants have engaged in or approved self-dealing
  • transactions of and gross mismanagement of AMC.
  • to dismiss and to stay discovery.
  • and should be interrupted in the face of their arguably dispositive motion
  • According to the allegations of the complaints, AMC operates 245 theaters with 1,585
  • partners of American Associated Enterprises,
  • According to plaintiffs' allegations, Stanley Durwood, his son Edward and certain other
  • execute film exhibition contracts, with the result that Enterprises received .5% of all film
  • Durwood as part of their employment responsibilities at AMC.
  • that as members of the Auditing Committee,
  • Plaintiffs allege that Stanley Dunvocd's
  • A motion to stay discovery' is within the discretion of the trial court in its supervision
  • Fish v. Hukhinson, Del.
  •    |